Trinity University
Faculty and Contract Staff Handbook

Toc button.jpg (2802 bytes)    Indx button.jpg (2396 bytes)    Home button.jpg (2770 bytes)


(4)    Faculty Development

(4A)    STATEMENT ON FACULTY DEVELOPMENT

(4B)    FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

(4C)    DISCRETIONARY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS

(4D)    FACULTY FELLOWSHIPS


(4B)    FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

For a summary of recent changes to this chapter, see Chapter 9A: Summary of Recent Revisions to this Handbook.

Contents of this page: 

  1. Overview

  2. Proposal Submission and Announcement Procedures

  3. Application Procedures for New Proposals

  4. Preparation and Distribution of Proposals

  5. Proposal Review Procedures (Panel Procedures and Recommendations; Executive Committee Recommendations; Final Recommendations and Announcements; Filing of Evaluation, Proposal, and Award Records; Confidentiality)

  6. Procedures for NEH Application Review

  7. Amendments

The Standard Operating Procedures of the Faculty Development Committee (FDC) contain information regarding submission and review of grant proposals and award announcements and the responsibilities of the FDC to the University at large.

I.    OVERVIEW

In a manner consistent with the Statement on Faculty Development (Chapter 4A), the Faculty Development Committee shall announce, review, and recommend for award proposals in the following areas: academic leave, summer stipend, course development, and independent special projects grants. The FDC shall also be involved in certain oversight responsibilities with regard to the Faculty Development discretionary funds disbursed by the Office of Academic Affairs, and to released-time arrangements.

In May of each academic year, the FDC shall distribute to the Academic Faculty a report of that year’s faculty development activity. This annual report shall include a summary of the current academic year’s activities of the FDC and a listing of all institutional awards. The annual report may include general and specific recommendations for improving the environment for faculty development on the campus.


II.    PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND ANNOUNCEMENT PROCEDURES


III.    APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW PROPOSALS

Applicants for development projects will obtain the guidelines and information forms from the Office of Academic Affairs. Proposal guidelines will include definitions of project purposes, requirements and evaluation criteria, a sample format for proposal preparation, small project expense guidelines, and a cover sheet. In the case of academic leaves, the Chair will provide a memo stating that, unless otherwise indicated, the department will be able to meet its curricular responsibilities to the University if an academic leave is granted. In the case of summer stipends, the Chair will provide a memo, indicating a willingness to have the summer stipend proposal funded. In the case of individual course development proposals, the Chair shall specify the benefits of the project to the relevant department(s) or program(s). The cover sheet for a summer stipend will require the applicant to list any summer grants from Trinity University funds, including FDC summer stipends, Junior Faculty Fellowships, or special salary stipends individually arranged with the administration, whether as a condition of appointment or otherwise. The cover sheet for an academic leave will indicate that the applicant is tenured at the time of application; it will also require that the applicant identify previous  leaves (academic or administrative) funded by Trinity University. Applicants for stipends and leaves must provide a curriculum vitae and a summary highlighting the results of previous awards, as described in the proposal submission instructions.

Proposals for leave and summer stipend projects will be directed to the AVPAA:BR. Proposals for individual course development will be directed to the AVPAA: CFD. Applicants for an academic leave, summer stipend, or individual course development award may apply for a special project grant which covers budget items necessary for that project, such as travel expenses.


IV.    PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF PROPOSALS


V.    PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCEDURES

A.    Panel Procedures and Recommendations

The Office of Academic Affairs shall forward to all panel members a copy of each proposal submitted to that panel. All proposals shall be considered on the basis of quality, relative to the goals of the appropriate area of faculty development. Each panel will decide which proposals meet the guidelines. Panel members are to review and evaluate each proposal according to the evaluative criteria as prescribed in appropriate guidelines as approved in the Statement on Faculty Development (Chapter 4A) (see evaluation guidelines for leaves with pay, summer stipends, individual course development, and special project grants).

The recommendation procedure for summer stipends will take place in three phases. In the first phase, the stipend proposals will be rank ordered by each member of the panel, the Chair, and the AVPAA:BR according to the evaluative guidelines stated in Chapter 4A, and the median rank for each proposal will be calculated. In the second phase, the stipend panel will consider the applicant's previous funding by Trinity University. Rankings from the first phase may be adjusted to the advantage of applicants who are probationary faculty or tenured faculty without recent funding and to the disadvantage of applicants who do not provide evidence of outcomes from prior support. In the third phase, applications will be judged as Recommended or Not Recommended. Panel members will submit their written signed confidential evaluations to the FDC Chair. These comments will not be available to the applicants and will be kept on file for a period of one year in the Office of Academic Affairs. The applicant can request further information via consultation with the FDC Chair.

Applications for academic leaves will be judged as Recommended or Not Recommended. If the panel does not concur with the recommendation of the department, it will notify the applicant and the department, and will explain the reasons for its recommendation. The panel will provide an opportunity for further justification or clarification of the proposal from either of these parties. If the final decision is not to recommend the proposal, each member of the panel must provide a written justification for his/her recommendation. These justifications will not be available to applicants but will be kept on file for a period of one year in the Office of Academic Affairs. The applicant can request further information via consultation with the FDC Chair.

B.    Final Recommendations and Announcements

The Chair of the FDC will submit the final recommendations from each panel to the Vice President for Faculty and Student Affairs. Academic leaves will be listed as Recommended or Not Recommended and will not be rank ordered. Summer stipends will be listed as Recommended or Not Recommended; Recommended summer stipends will be rank ordered. Following administrative approval, the President and the Chair of the FDC will jointly notify recipients of awards by letter.

C.    Filing of Evaluation, Proposal, and Award Records

Records of the FDC shall be retained in the Office of Academic Affairs. A single copy of all proposals and presidential award letters will be filed as permanent institutional records.

D.   Confidentiality

The confidentiality of all Panel and Executive Committee evaluations, discussions, and recommendations shall be strictly maintained by members of the FDC.


VI.    PROCEDURES FOR NEH APPLICATION REVIEW

The FDC will review applications from faculty members who wish to apply for a National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Stipend Award when more proposals are received than are allowed by NEH. Panel II (stipends) of the FDC will evaluate these applications and make recommendations to the administration concerning which applications should be recommended for funding.


VII.    AMENDMENTS

These Standard Operating Procedures may be amended by a majority vote of the membership of the Faculty Development Committee, provided that the proposed amendment has been distributed in writing to all members of the Committee at least four days prior to the meeting at which the proposed amendment is to be considered.


Table of Contents | Index | Trinity University Home

Top of Page

This page was last modified on 05/30/12

For further information, please call (210) 999-8201, or write to

Office of Academic Affairs
Trinity University
One Trinity Place
San Antonio, Texas  78212-7200