| Home | hhaines@trinity.edu | Office Hours | Courses | Elvis! | About Me |
![]() |
Associate
Professor e-mail: hhaines@trinity.edu |
|
|
The Viet Nam War Portfolio |
|
Inside: |
|
|
Project Requirements: |
|
|
This is a small group assignment that will require work throughout the semester. Each class member will work as a member of a three or four person team that will be responsible for producing a Viet Nam War Portfolio scheduled for submission at the beginning of our class meeting on Monday, December 3. This assignment constitutes 40% of the final grade. The instructor expects each team to meet very high standards of excellence on this assignment and is prepared to consult with each team throughout the semester. Groups that avoid such consultation will be regarded as marginal. |
The Portfolio will be organized into three parts. Part One: Critical Understanding of a Film The assignment is intended to provide a framework for the development of study groups and to encourage an in-depth group investigation of three important areas directly related to the course content: film representations of the war, bibliographic and cinematic citations, primary research based on interviews. The assignment will allow for continued small group discussion of our course readings and for the demonstration of original critical analysis, bibliographic work, and primary research efforts. Your team is expected to view the film or documentary together and to develop a critical response to it. You will receive a list of feature films and documentaries that will be held on reserve for you at the library's Instructional Media Services (IMS) desk. Keep in mind that this section of your Portfolio is expected to demonstrate your critical understanding of media representations of the Viet Nam War. In this section, your team is expected to apply the course's theoretical framework to a careful and convincing critical analysis of the media text you select. Remember that one of the objectives of this assignment is encourage small group discussion of the course content and collegial application of key concepts to a specific example. Teams that merely describe the plot of a film, without actually linking the film to the course content, will miss the target entirely. This section of the Portfolio will require a bibliography and internal citations, similar to the essays that appear in our anchor text, Dittmar & Michaud. Part Two: Critical Understanding of Written and Visual Documents The second part of the Portfolio will consist of an annotated bibliography & filmography. In the annotated bibliography, your team will list twenty (20) written texts that, in your informed opinion, are most crucial to a good understanding of the American experience in the Viet Nam War. These written texts may be historical or critical analyses, novels, memoirs, short stories, speeches, performance art pieces, policy documents, poems, the lyrics of popular songs, plays, etc. In each citation, you must provide a brief explanation of why the item is on your list of the top twenty written texts that any person should read in order to understand the American experience of the Viet Nam War. The bibliographic citations will be listed in alphabetical order, according to author. In addition to the top twenty written texts, your team is also required to provide a filmography that lists the top ten (10) Viet Nam War films and television programs. Here, the film and television citations should be listed according to your group's perception of their importance. The number one film or television program on your filmography should be the most important one, and the others are listed in descending order. Each film or television citation must include a brief explanation of why your group recommends it for viewing. What makes it a significant representation of the American experience in the Viet Nam War? Unlike Part One of the Portfolio, Part Two may draw upon the literature and media representations that are assigned in our class, as well as other sources as your group sees fit. The instructor seeks no preconceived list that magically explains the complexities of the war and how our culture represents it. The instructor has no ideal list in mind! The purpose of this part of the assignment is to give your team the opportunity to grapple with what you regard as important documents and media texts related to the war, and it is very doubtful that your team will produce the definitive list of sources that explains the war. Given the enormous range of war literature and media texts, it is very doubtful that anyone could produce a definitive list that would be limited to the small number of citations required in this section. But here's a key point: Your brief explanation of why you have selected a particular item for you bibliography or for your filmography should be convincing. Keep these explanations brief, but link them to our reading and discussions. Demonstrate your informed opinion, not just your opinion. Make copies of Part Two for distribution to all class members at our Final Examination Period. Part Three: Primary Research The third part of the Portfolio will consist of your group's primary research in the form of an interview you conduct and report. Here, you are required to locate a person who experienced the Viet Nam War or its aftermath in some crucial way. This person might have been a combat soldier, a medic, a nurse, a radio operator, etc., in the war zone. This person might have been a soldier assigned to some other part of the world, including the U.S., during the war. This person might have been an anti-war activist, or perhaps he or she worked in support of the war effort in some way. This person might have been a loved one of a soldier or of a draft resister. This person might have been a college student who worried about his draft deferment throughout the war. This person might have been a member of the South Vietnamese government or army, or this person might be the child of a Vietnamese-American refugee. Groups are especially encouraged to talk with persons about how people at Trinity University or in San Antonio experienced the war. Remember that San Antonio is a military town and that many retired Viet Nam era service personnel live here. Your own family members are potentially excellent interviewees, if they choose to participate. You are expected to demonstrate initiative in tracking down a suitable interviewee and sensitivity in the formulation of questions. In order to avoid duplicate interviews, your group must secure the instructor's approval of a proposed interviewee. This should happen early in the semester. Note that the formulation of questions will be of paramount significance, and you will want to make use of the instructor's professional expertise in this area. |
|
At no time should you be uncertain about the criteria whereby your Portfolio is evaluated. This assignment description attempts to specify the criteria in the above material. The instructor is eager to clarify any confusion that may exist regarding the criteria for evaluation. Each team member will receive an individual grade on the Portfolio. Please submit an individual summary of what you contributed to the Project's success, and provide evaluations of your team members' activities. If, during the semester, your team runs into organizational problems, you are required to alert the instructor so that he can intervene and help keep the work on track. Organizational problems sometimes originate in the inability or unwillingness or a team member to meet deadlines and to contribute to the collective effort. It is your responsibility to alert the instructor about such problems, so he can help the team member overcome the difficulty that is causing the problem. If your team fails to alert the instructor to such organizational problems, you are helping to facilitate the individual's difficulty. At Trinity, most of these problems can be readily and humanely solved, if they are dealt with immediately. Very often, such problems emerge when a group takes too long to develop a sense of membership (what the small group communication research literature calls "cohesion") and too long to develop an equitable distribution of labor, individual and group objectives, and mini-deadlines that are carefully monitored by everyone in the group. The key to success appears to be early organization in the semester and a tactical approach to getting the job done. Hmmm. Perhaps you might wish to conceptualize your group as a squad, a small military unit with a mission and a plan! |
|