|
Spring 2005 |
ECONOMICS 1312
|
J.G. Gonzalez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem Set # 2 |
|
This problem set is due Tuesday, March
29th, at the beginning of the class period. Problem sets done on notebook paper or
unstapled will not be accepted. Late
problem sets are unacceptable also.
1. In 2005
a) Draw a diagram representing the Moroccan economy
during 2005 (Hint: In this diagram,
equilibrium output must occur at a level in which net exports are negative; and
this should be shown in your diagram).
b) Assume that the government wants to reduce the trade deficit without changing the level of national output. Describe the changes in fiscal policy and in the exchange rate that would be necessary to achieve these objectives. Use a diagram to show the effects of your proposed policy changes.
2. You are given the following information about
Linkin’s economy:
Each year consumers spend $1,200 million (or
$1.2 billion) regardless of the level of their disposable income. In addition to those $1,200 million, they
always spend 80% of their yearly disposable income.
Investment is fixed at $700 million.
Government expenditures are $600 million.
Net taxes equal $450 million.
Exports are $900 million.
Imports are always equal to 5% of the level
of disposable income.
a) How much would Linkin’s equilibrium level of
output be?
b) How much would net exports be when this
economy is at equilibrium output?
c)
Linkin’s main exports are comic books. Due
to recent research that proved that reading comic books decreases performance
in economics exams, Linkin’s exports decreased by $300 million to a new level
of $600 million. How much would Linkin’s
new equilibrium level of output be?
d) How much would net exports be when this
economy is at its new equilibrium output?
e) Dr. Chester Bennington,
Linkin’s President, decides that he wants equilibrium output to go back to its
original level. How much would he have
to cut taxes to achieve his objective?
f) How much would net exports be when the
policies of President Bennington bring equilibrium output back to its
original level?
3. You are given the following information about
the
a) In 2005, the unemployment rate is 6%. Calculate the actual, structural, and
cyclical deficits (as percentages of GDP) of the
b) In 2006, the unemployment rate is 8%. Calculate the actual, structural, and
cyclical deficits (as percentages of GDP) of the
c) In 2007, the unemployment rate is 9%. Calculate the actual, structural, and
cyclical deficits (as percentages of GDP) of the
d) In 2008, the U.S. Congress and the President
decide to increase taxes and cut government expenditures to reduce the
government deficit. Now you are told
that when unemployment is 5 percent, government outlays are 15 percent of GDP,
while taxes and other government revenues are equal to 14 percent of GDP. Furthermore, as happened before, for each 1
percentage point increase in the unemployment rate, government outlays increase
by 2 percentage points of GDP and taxes fall by 1 percentage point of GDP. Assuming that the unemployment rate remains
at 9% after these policies are implemented; calculate the actual, structural,
and cyclical deficits (as percentages of GDP) of the
e) In 2009, the unemployment rate is 7%. Calculate the actual, structural, and
cyclical deficits as percentages of GDP) of the
4. You are given the following information about
Canoga’s economy:
·
Each year consumers spend $2,000 million (or
$2.0 billion) regardless of the level of their disposable income. In addition to that $2,000 million, they
always spend 60% of their yearly disposable income.
·
Investment is fixed at $3,400 million.
·
Government expenditures are $4,000
million.
·
Taxes equal 10% of income.
·
Exports are $2,000 million.
·
Imports are always equal to $1,000
million plus 20% of the level of disposable income.
a) How much would Canoga’s equilibrium level of
output be?
b) How much would net exports be when this
economy is at equilibrium output?
c) How much would the net government surplus (or
deficit) be when this economy is at equilibrium output?
d) Due to optimism about the future of the
economy, Canoga’s investors decide to increase their investment level by $800
million to a new level of $4,200 million.
How much would Canoga’s new equilibrium level of output be?
e) How much would the net government surplus (or
deficit) be when this economy is at its new equilibrium output? Was this change in the surplus (or deficit)
due to structural or cyclical reasons?
Explain.
f) Following supply-side ideas, and in order to stimulate the economy Canoga’s President, Dr. Phoebe Halliwell, cuts taxes from 10% of income to a new level of only 7.6% of income. How much would Canoga’s new equilibrium level of output be?
5.
Visit the U.S. Office of Management and Budget web site (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/)
and
use the FY 2006 Federal Budget Publications to
obtain the data necessary to answer the following questions (use the “Browse the FY06 budget”
link).
a) How much was the total budget surplus or deficit of the Federal Government for each year from 1980 until 2004? (Note: You should look for the Historical Tables section, “Table 1.1-Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits: 1789-2010” to get these numbers)
b) Was the change in the actual deficit from
1980 to 1983 mainly due to cyclical or structural reasons? Explain.
c) Was the change in the actual deficit from
1984 to 1986 mainly due to cyclical or structural reasons? Explain.
d) Was the change in the actual deficit from
1990 to 1992 mainly due to cyclical or structural reasons? Explain.
e) Was the change in the actual deficit (or
surplus) from 1992 to 2000 mainly due to cyclical or structural reasons? Explain.
f) Was the change in the actual deficit (or
surplus) from 2001 to 2004 mainly due to cyclical or structural reasons? Explain.
g) How much was the estimated total budget
surplus or deficit of the Federal Government for each year from 2005
until 2010 according to the Historical Tables (these estimations were prepared
at the beginning of 2005)?
h) Why do you think the government is estimating
a decline in the future deficit? Is this
due to cyclical or structural reasons?
Explain.
6. Assume that you are hired as an economic
advisor to the Chairperson of the Federal Reserve Bank. Your boss is interested in knowing the
different levels of investment that would take place when the interest rate
changes. She gives you the following
information about the projects that investors are contemplating for this year
(Note: Operation costs do not include
financial costs):
|
Project |
Total Investment |
Revenues |
Operation Costs |
|
A |
50 |
25 |
21 |
|
B |
75 |
30 |
20 |
|
C |
15 |
8 |
7 |
|
D |
140 |
50 |
35 |
|
E |
125 |
40 |
29 |
a) How much would the level of investment be
when the interest rate equals 9%?
Explain fully.
b) How much would the level of investment be
when the interest rate equals 7%?
Explain fully.
c) Use the information from parts a) and b) to
draw the investment demand curve for this economy.
d) The Chairperson of the Federal Reserve System
is contemplating a tight monetary policy that would result in an increase in
the interest rates from 7% to 9%.
Assuming that you are a mainstream economist, what would you predict the
result of this policy would be on the level of real GDP and on the price
level? Draw a diagram in support of your
answer and explain fully (Note: You do not have sufficient data to provide
exact numbers for real GDP nor price level, however, you can discuss the direction
of their changes).
7. Visit the Bureau of Economic Analysis web
site (http://www.bea.doc.gov/). Click on “Gross Domestic Product.” Then click on “Interactive NIPA tables” and then
on “Frequently Requested NIPA Tables.” Look
for “Table 1.1.5 Gross Domestic Product
(A) (Q)” and search for the annual data from 2001 until 2004.
a) Write down the Gross Domestic Product,
Personal Consumption Expenditures, and Imports for every year from 2001 until
2004 (use yearly data). Use this
dataset to calculate the implied values for the marginal propensity to consume
and the marginal propensity to import, assuming that taxes do not vary with
income.
b) Calculate the open economy multiplier for 2002,
2003, and 2004 (assume that taxes do not vary with income).
c) What happened to the open economy multiplier
from 2002 to 2004? Why did it increase
(or decrease)? What does this imply for
the effect of a change in taxes on GDP?