Vernon L. Smith, Awarded Nobel Prize in 2002,

Lecture presented April 14, 2004.                                                                                                       Selected Links to Vernon Smith’s Research below

Vernon L. Smith is Professor of Economics and Law at George Mason University, a research scholar in the Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, and a Fellow of the Mercatus Center all in Arlington, VA.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences to Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith. The Nobel Committee recognized Smith "for having established laboratory experiments as a tool in empirical economic analysis, especially in the study of alternative market mechanisms."

 

Quotes from Vernon Smith’s April 2004 lecture at Trinity University:

 

In my early childhood years I will think …. nothing is unknowable, you had only to seek it in a book or some source somewhere. I will know so little and be hungry to know, but I will gradually learn that the action—all the learning and understanding—will be in the pursuit, not in the consummation of knowledge and that the questions always grow faster than the answers. Every answer sprouts multiple questions so that knowledge becomes an unending quest, but therein lays its charming challenge.

 

In the autumn of 1932, at age five, I took my place in the first grade alongside more seasoned farm children for primary education in the classic rural one-room schoolhouse. …. As I later became aware, this classroom implemented the original ‘progressive system’, in which you were part of a single seamless community consisting of all elementary grades. There were of course only three subjects—reading, writing and arithmetic. Reading seemed to be the litmus test; if you were less strong in arithmetic, or writing, the next year you could participate along with those in the row on your left before Mr. Hemberger got to your row. The whole purpose of this management style was to move each person along at her own pace of accomplishment, get her through school and into farm work where she could be useful. I understand that the earliest achievement tests showed high performance in Kansas and Nebraska because of these rural schools.

 

In 1934 my father returned to the Bridgeport Machine Company [iin Wichita] for alternate week half time work, and subsequently full time work. This was fortuitous, as we lost ‘ownership’ of the farm to the mortgage bank. …. We were returning from the farm world of personal exchange through the trading of favors to a world of impersonal exchange through markets. More, but far from all, of our needs would be met from store-bought goods, and that world would gradually be emerging, reinvigorated, from the great depression. …. Wichita and farm life were separated by location, intellectual and economic activity. The city had homegrown a surprising breadth of prominent business life. Beech, Stearman and Cessna Aircraft, Coleman Lantern Company, Dold meatpacking, and the Fred Koch, Jack Vickers and other petroleum companies provided tangible initial evidence of the machinery of markets, specialization and globalization. Bold independent actions by Coleman, Cessna, Beech, Koch, Garvey and many others instilled a mid-western sense of freedom and entrepreneurship.

 

… there is an inherent tension between the individual’s experience in social exchange, and the requirements of freedom in the external order of impersonal exchange through markets. As I have written in my research, you can make the case that the collectivist individual impulse is nourished by the human perceptions and understanding that comes experientially from what the economic historian and Nobelist, Doug North, calls ‘personal exchange.’ Personal exchange is what was prominent on the farm, and takes the form of trading favors, and barter, in close nit communities based on trust, trustworthiness and reputations for being a reliable social exchanger. In this more intimate environment our individual experience is that good comes from reciprocity—doing good and receiving good in return—being cooperative, and a good neighbor. At the level of the family, extended family, and our social groupings our direct experience is that you produce good by intentional acts of doing good.  In impersonal market exchange through prices, we do not see that it involves the same reciprocal benefits for buyer and seller that characterize personal exchange. Neither do we see that specialization—or task subdivision—derives from and is supported by markets. We do not experience the fact that millions of people, with differing cultures, languages, skills and resources, cooperate through long networks of interdependence connected by prices.

 

Caltech was a meat grinder like I could never have imagined. The first thing to which one has to adapt is the fact that no matter how high people might sample in the right tail of the distribution of ‘intelligence,’ or whatever it is that measures college performance, that sample is still normally distributed in performing on the materials in the Caltech curriculum. …. I studied night, day, weekends and survived hundreds of problems, but what a joy it was to take freshman chemistry from the inspiring Linus Pauling; … hear physics lectures by J. Robert Oppenheimer on his frequent visits to Caltech; attend a visiting lecture by Bertrand Russell; and regularly see von Karman, Anderson, Zwicky, Tolman, Millikan and other legendary figures of that time, on campus. I discovered that one kind of great teacher is the kind that simply thinks out loud, in commonsensical terms of basic principles, and you easily can read his thought processes.

 

I relished the unbending rigor of mathematics, physics and engineering, but then, as a senior, I took an economics course and found it very intriguing—you could actually learn something about the economic principles underlying the claims of socialism, capitalism and other such ‘isms?’ Little did I know, but I was intrigued.  Curious about professional economics, I went to the Caltech library, stumbled upon Samuelson’s Foundations of Economic Analysis, and later that year, von Mises’ Human Action. From the former, it was clear that economics could be done like physics, but from the latter there seemed to be much in the way of reasoning that was not like physics. I also subscribed to the Quarterly Journal of Economics, and one of the first issues had a paper by Hollis Chenery on Engineering Production Functions. So, economics was also like engineering! I had not a hint then as to how much those first impressions would be changed in my thinking over the decades to follow.

 

Selected Links to Vernon Smith’s Research:

Vernon Smith home page

What is Experimental Economics?

The "Ingredients" of an Economics Experiment

Experimental Methods in Economics

Methodology and Function of Experiments in Micoeconomics

Smith's Nobel Toast (in pdf)

Smith's Nobel Address (in pdf)

Theodore Bergstrom on Vernon Smith, The Experimentalist (in pdf)

 

Return to Nobel Series