Bob Jensen's Additions to Bookmarks for Quarter 4 of 2006

You've got to be taught to hate and fear
You've got to be taught from year to year
It's got to be drummed in your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught
You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made
And people whose skin is a different shade
You've got to be carefully taught
You've got to be taught before it's too late
Before you are six or seven or eight
To hate all the people your relatives hate
You've got to be carefully taught You've got to be carefully taught
Rogers and Rodgers and Hammerstein in South Pacific

Parents have forced a school trip to a mosque to be abandoned because they objected to their children learning about Islam. Atwood Primary in Croydon was forced to call off a Year 5 class visit to a mosque after nearly a third of parents refused to give consent.
"Class trip to mosque blocked by parents," Canada's Daily Mail, November 22, 2006 --- Click Here

Episcopalians tend to be better-educated and tend to reproduce at lower rates than some other denominations
(e.g., Roman Catholic and Mormon churches that tend to encourage large families)
Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, the first woman to head the US Episcopal Church (ECUSA) --- http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/nov/06112106.html
Jensen Comment
I can't believe Bishop Schori made such a statement! She does confirm why Episcopalians, being more educated, are more unfit for military service than prolific and uneducated Roman Catholics who support Senator Kerry and Representative Rangel..

MUSLIM terrorists are no more likely to come from places with large Islamic populations than anywhere else, according to Manchester academics. Dr Ludi Simpson and Dr Nissa Finney studied media reports to map the location of suspects charged under anti-terror laws. The Manchester university researchers found that the proportion of people who have been charged is no greater in areas with large Muslim populations.
Seb Ramsay, "Large Muslim areas 'not breeding grounds for terror'," The U.K Manchester Evening News, November 22, 2006 --- Click Here

With Baghdad shaken by daily outbreaks of sectarian violence, in Iraq's western al-Anbar province, groups of former Iraqi Baathists are battling armed Islamist groups for control of this largely desert region near the Syrian border . . . The former Baathist fighters are believed to be relatively secular while their opponents share al-Qaeda's dream of establishing an Islamic caliphate in Iraq which will then be a launchpad for carrying out attacks around the Middle East.
Maher al-Jasem, "Sunni face new conflict in Iraq war," Al Jazeera, November 24, 2006 --- Click Here

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi Sunday accused the West of trying to grab Sudan's oil wealth with its plan to send U.N. troops to Darfur and urged Khartoum to reject them. "Western countries and America are not busying themselves out of sympathy for the Sudanese people or for Africa but for oil and for the return of colonialism to the African continent," he said.
"Gadhafi: U.N. Darfur force is ruse to grab Sudan's oil," CNN News, November 19, 2006 --- Click Here
Jensen Comment
Yeah Right! George Clooney and Oprah secretly conspired with Bush and Cheney to grab the oil wells. See the video for yourself at http://www.theirc.org/resources/george-clooney-visit-chad-sudan.html

The news is that two years after we've said "genocide" that it's still going on and it's increasing — and that somewhere in there we can all talk about this and make speeches and say this is horrible and we have to do something. But every day we don't do something, and every day this goes on, thousands of people are dying and dying horrific deaths . . . Here's the thing: We always see this now. We have tragedy fatigue on television. Every day, 20 kids [are] killed in Iraq or, you know, there's always disaster. Pakistan, Afghanistan, there's always horrible disaster in Nepal now. But this is genocide, and if everybody just got up right now out of their chair and picked up a phone and called their congressman, or called the number that registered with the president, it makes a difference. It always has.
Oscar Winning George Clooney, ABC News, April 30, 2006 --- Click Here
Clooney On Darfur | September 15, 2006 (Video)

We all condemn terrorism, because its victims are the innocent. But, can terrorism be contained and eradicated through war, destruction and the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocents? If that were possible, then why has the problem not been resolved?
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "Letter to the American People," President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, November 29, 2006 --- http://www.blogsofwar.com/2006/11/29/mahmoud-ahmadinejads-letter-the-american-people/

“Americans are going to be very puzzled by it (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's, "Letter to the American People,") ,” said William Beeman, a linguistic anthropologist at Brown University who specializes in Persian. “People are simply not used to being talked to this way.” He added, “It is almost a sermon, which is very much in keeping with his religious background. But I should also point out it is also a lecture.” The letter reminded Americans that “many victims of Katrina continue to suffer, and countless Americans continue to live in poverty and homelessness.” It also lamented: “Civil liberties are increasingly being curtailed. Even the privacy of the individuals is fast losing its meaning.” The president made no reference to the level of poverty, political freedom or judicial independence in his own country.
Michael Slackman, "Iran’s President Criticizes Bush in Letter to American People," The New York Times, November 30, 2006 --- http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad --- http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/mahmoud_ahmadinejad/

Powerful Iran is the best friend of the neighboring states and the best guarantor of regional security
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Our religion prohibits us from having nuclear arms and our religious leader has prohibited it from the point of view of religious law. It's a closed road.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

We believe that atomic energy is a blessing given by God.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iran is ready to transfer nuclear know-how to the Islamic countries due to their need.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

As the Imam (Ayatollah Khomeini) said, Israel must be wiped off the map.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Jensen Comment
There are academic disputes over the translation of this threat --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel
A synopsis of Mr Ahmadinejad's speech on the Iranian Presidential website states:

He further expressed his firm belief that the new wave of confrontations generated in Palestine and the growing turmoil in the Islamic world would in no time wipe Israel away (however interpreted) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel

They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

CNN host Glenn Beck criticizes the rest of the Western media, including by implication his own station CNN, for drastically failing to properly report on Islamic extremism. This documentary, screened on the American (but not so far on the international) version of CNN --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PWIK8YTZS8

Researchers have been scouring rivers in Europe and the US for traces of cocaine consumption. The result: Cocaine use is probably much greater than previously assumed -- and New Yorkers are the biggest coke-heads of all.
Markus Becker, "New York Blows Away the Competition," Spiegel (Germany), November 23, 2006 --- http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,450078,00.html

The radioactive poison used to kill the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko is being offered for sale over the internet for less than £40. A company in the US claims to supply polonium-210 to anyone for just $69 plus postage and packing. A three-pack set of “alpha, beta, gamma” radioactive isotopes also includes polonium-210. United Nuclear, based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, tells purchasers: “If you’re looking for clean, accurate, certified radiation sources, here they are. . . All isotopes are produced fresh in a nuclear reactor and shipped directly to you.”
Tony Halpin in Moscow, "Polonium-210? it's yours for $69, no questions asked," London Times, November 30, 2006 --- http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2478908.html
Jensen Comment
This makes little sense since coming near this radiation is dangerous to postal workers and other innocent people who get near the package.

Be unselfish: respect the selfishness of others.
Stanislaw Jerzy Lec (1909-1966) --- Click Here

A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Edward Abbey

This world is a comedy for those who think but a tragedy for those who feel.
Horace Walpole

Be nice to people on your way up because you'll meet them on your way down.
Wilson Mizner (1876-1933) --- Click Here

Never mind those promised reforms
The reception thrown by Nancy Pelosi at the Capitol a week after the Democrats prevailed in congressional elections was a party some power players had been waiting more than a decade to attend. The fête was for newly elected freshmen lawmakers, but Pelosi's invited guests included big-name Democratic lobbyists like Jack Quinn, Tony Podesta and Steve Elmendorf. Said a partygoer: "I thought to myself, they're all back, all the same old faces. It was just like old times." . . . Who will win the coming battle between reformers and revanchists? The market is betting against reform. Demand for anyone with access to powerful Democrats on the Hill is soaring. Lobbyists who couldn't get a meeting (before the election) are suddenly a hot commodity. "I've gotten a lot of calls from headhunters in the last two months," says Florence Prioleau, a lobbyist who has maintained close ties with her former boss, New York's Charles Rangel, incoming chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. Pelosi's former chief of staff, George Crawford, has just been hired by Amgen, a biotech company, to represent its interests with the new Congress.
Massimo Calabresi, "When the Democrats Take Back K Street: Democratic lobbyists are enjoying a comeback after 12 years of exile. Never mind those promised reforms," Time Magazine, November 26, 2006 --- Click Here

The City Council here voted late Tuesday to ban certain giant retail stores, dealing a blow to Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s potential to expand in the nation's eighth-largest city. The measure, approved on a 5-3 vote, prohibits stores of more than 90,000 square feet that use 10 percent of space to sell groceries and other merchandise that is not subject to sales tax.
Elliot Spagat, "San Diego to Ban Wal-Mart Supercenters," Yahoo News, November 29, 2006 --- http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061129/wal_mart_supercenter_ban.html?.v=4
Jensen Comment
Think of how much better off residents of San Diego will be as a result of this decision supposedly in their best interests. I wonder what would happen if the choice was put to a test in a referendum? The entire state of Vermont banned new Wal-Mart stores of any kind, and now I can't get into my closest New Hampshire Wal-Mart (ten miles away in Littleton) because most of the cars in the overflowing parking lot have green license plates. Claiming that sales tax revenue in San Diego and Vermont will increase without Wal-Mart stores is phony to the point of being fraudulent. The real reason is that local business interests can't compete with Wal-Mart --- which is a much more legitimate argument but it won't sell with voters. I might add that the lowest paying workers are those clerks in small retail stores. These exploited workers would have much better salaries and benefits working for Wal-Mart. But from a selfish standpoint, I hope that my little village never allows any store to have more than 50 square feet. We have only one Sugar Hill store to date (an old fashioned cheese and venison store). One little store's enough for our village as far as I'm concerned. I'd vote against Wal-Mart if it ever came to a vote in Sugar Hill. But then I'd also vote against any new store in Sugar Hill. But I was all in favor of more and more Wal-Mart Supercenters when I lived in San Antonio, because more Wal-Marts beside the many Super K-Marts and other giant stores are not going to affect the ambiance of San Antonio (or San Diego).

The essay — in his collection There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech — ought to be more notorious still. According to Fish, academics will do anything to distinguish themselves from “the realities of the marketplace.” One of whose realities, I am suggesting here, is that bosses do exist in both realms. Perhaps we can’t abide a vocabulary of bosses because the need to distinguish ourselves from the world of business is so crucial. Or, more interestingly, perhaps we already have enough oppression. “In the psychic economy of the academy,” Fish explains, “oppression is the sign of virtue. The more victimized you are, the more subject to various forms of humiliation, the more you can tell yourself that you are in proper relation to the corrupted judgment of merely worldly eyes.”
Terry Caesar, "Who’s the Boss?" Inside Higher Ed, November 21, 2006 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/11/21/caesar

It’s a funny old world. Chinese manufacturers are copying the circuit boards and designs of products from Japan and Korea, and they’re doing it so fast that by the time the originals arrive in the marketplace, they’re seen as the fakes! China is a land of endless factories, with many pumping out the world’s most desirable gadgets, from iPods to portable computers to digital cameras and much more.
Alex Zaharov-Reutt, "Fake chinese electronics selling better than the originals!" ITWire, November 27, 2006 --- http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/7483/52/

A state office that oversaw a series of controversial charities tied to African-American legislators is being scrutinized by the FBI, Gov. Kathleen Blanco’s office confirmed Tuesday in announcing that it had complied with a subpoena for records from the department. “The governor’s office staff has complied with the FBI’s request for information dating back to 1996 regarding certain programs funded by the former Office of Urban Affairs,”
Gordon Russell, Jan Moller and James Varney, New Orleans Times Picayune, November 22, 2006 --- Click Here
Jensen Comment
Government programs are always ripe for the plucking by ex-generals and criminal politicians, most especially Louisiana politicians who've been notoriously corrupt since the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Crime just grows and grows hand-in-hand with government programs and Louisiana seems to steal more than its fair share from Federal programs. For Louisiana criminals, of all races, Katrina was indeed a perfect storm.

Each place has its own advantages - Heaven for the climate and Hell for society.
Mark Twain

A church that wanted to do something special for Hurricane Katrina victims gave a $75,000 house, free and clear, to a couple who said they were left homeless by the storm. But the couple turned around and sold the place without ever moving in, and went back to New Orleans. "Take it up with God," an unrepentant Joshua Thompson told a TV reporter after it was learned that he and the woman he identified as his wife had flipped the home for $88,000. Church members said they feel their generosity was abused by scam artists . . . The church was also shocked by an ungrateful interview the couple gave with WHBQ-TV in Memphis. "I really don`t like this area," said Delores Thompson. "I really didn`t, and I didn`t know anybody, so that`s why I didn`t move in and I sold it."
"2 unrepentant about selling Katrina gift," The Angola Press, November 22, 2006 ---
http://www.angolapress-angop.ao/noticia-e.asp?ID=489462
Also see http://community.myfoxmemphis.com/blogs/category/NEWS

"They came in humble like they really needed a new start, and our hearts went out to them," said Jean Phillips, a real estate agent and member of the Temple of Deliverance Church of God in Christ. "They actually begged for the home." . . . "Do I have any legal problems? What do you mean? The house was given to me," Delores Thompson said. "I have the paperwork and everything." She refused further comment and hung up.
WTOP --- http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&sid=982862
Jensen Comment
We can only hope that God takes it up with scammers like Joshua and Delores Thompson. If we could get a glimpse of them ten years from now my guess is that they will not be so proud and happy that they scammed the Good Samaritans. It would be fantastic if they prospered and became reformed Good Samaritans themselves --- but in the meantime don't hold your breath!

British criminal psychologists are putting together a list of the 100 most dangerous murderers and rapists before they have committed any such crimes, The Times said.
"British police targeting would-be criminals before they offend," PhysOrg, November 27, 2006 ---http://physorg.com/news83838079.html
Jensen Comment
In the U.S., our ACLU would never tolerate such a crime prevention move even against our even our most threatening criminals.

And contrary to the United Nations resolutions, contrary to the official policy of the United States government, contrary to the Quartet so-called road map, all of those things – and contrary to the majority of Israeli people's opinion – this occupation and confiscation and colonization of land in the West Bank is the prime cause of a continuation of violence in the Middle East," he said.
"Carter blames Israel for Mideast conflict: 'Domination' over Palestinians 'atrocious,' ex-prez tells 'Good Morning America'," WorldNetDaily, November 27, 2006 --- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53120

Carter's book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid" is so biased that it inevitably raises the question of what would motivate a decent man like Jimmy Carter to write such an indecent book. Whatever Mr. Carter's motives may be, his authorship of this ahistorical, one-sided, and simplistic brief against Israel forever disqualifies him from playing any positive role in fairly resolving the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. That is a tragedy because the Carter Center, which has done much good in the world, could have been a force for peace if Jimmy Carter were as generous in spirit to the Israelis as he is to the Palestinians.
Alan M. Dershowitz, (Harvard Law School). New York Sun, November 22, 2006 --- http://www.nysun.com/article/43958
A knowledgeable Lebanese-American casts even more doubt on Carter's scholarship
see http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53154
Also see http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/reviews/carter.html

One of the most nefarious elements in the book is Carter’s effort to paint Israel as hostile to Christians. He repeatedly refers to “Christians and Muslims” rather than simply the Palestinians in a transparent effort to suggest that Israeli actions were harming Christians and not just Muslims or Arabs. He claims, for example, that “many priests and pastors” were disturbed by the control of Israeli religious parties over “all forms of worship.” On a visit to Jerusalem in 1990, he said he met with a variety of Christian leaders who he said complained of various abuses. He doesn’t offer a single specific example, but tars Israel with bigotry. He then says that Prime Minister Shamir told him that religious parties had authority over all religious matters because of the needs of the coalition government. Carter says that this conversation made him understand why “there was such a surprising exodus of Christians from the Holy Land.”

These charges are so vile they require a more substantial response. First, while Christians are unwelcome in Islamic states such as Saudi Arabia, and most have been driven out of their longtime homes in Lebanon, Christians continue to be welcome in Israel. Christians have always been a minority in Israel, but it is the only Middle East nation where the Christian population has grown in the last half century (from 34,000 in 1948 to 145,000 today), in large measure because of the freedom to practice their religion.

The "progressive" media grows angry with Democrats who do not endorse Jimmy Carter's rage toward Israel
Instead, Democrats are shoring up their pro-Israel bona fides. They are strikingly anxious because of a courageous new book by President Jimmy Carter that hit American bookstores in mid-November, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.
Michael F. Brown, "Dems Rebut Carter on Israeli 'Apartheid'," The Nation, November 20, 2006 --- http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061204/brown
Jensen Comment
I don't find solutions in Carter's book that have not already been advocated and tried even by Israel. Carter insists on Israel's right to exist. He's a man a peace who does not advocate wiping out Israel. Liberals who like to be called "progressives" advocate cessation of military and economic backing of Israel. Do progressives really want Israel so wounded and dying that Israel seriously considers resorting to its huge nuclear arsenal. As usual, the "progressives" are long on criticism but short on alternatives. So is Jimmy Carter. Finding solutions is not nearly as much fun as finding fault.

Most chilling of all, could the festering differences precipitate a military confrontation involving the use of nuclear weapons? It is known that Israel has a major nuclear arsenal and the capability to launch weapons quickly, and some neighboring states are believed to be attempting to acquire their own atomic bombs. Without progress toward peace, desperation or adventurism on either side could precipitate such a confrontation.
Jimmy Carter, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid

A joint paratrooper and Shin Bet force uncovered an explosive lab in Nablus Friday night. In the lab, the forces found teddy bears with wires hanging from them, apparently slated to be used as explosive devices . . . Captain Assaf Cabra, a company commander at the Haruv battalion, addressed the operation at the time: "We launched a regimental operation in Nablus, which included searches, seizing weapons and arrests. We uncovered the explosive lab in the casba, which contained between 40 to 50 kilograms (88 to 110 pounds) of explosives for preparing explosive devices."
"Nablus: Explosive teddy bears found in lab," YNet News, November 25, 2006 --- http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3332360,00.html
Jensen Comment
When the teddy bears blow up in the faces of children, Jimmy Carter reminds them that their parents really caused the pain and suffering. In fairness, Israel's recklessness has killed and maimed children in Palestine. But it is a particularly vile deed to deliberately plant explosives in toys for children.

Denmark, once the symbol of a welcoming welfare state, is becoming part of an anti-immigrant backlash sweeping across Europe. Sentiments once associated with ultra right-wing parties are becoming mainstream.
Sylvia Poggioli, "Danes' Anti-Immigrant Backlash Marks Radical Shift," NPR, November 20, 2006 --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6505809

French presidential candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen is drawing support again this year for his anti-immigrant stance. The extreme-right politician is pushing for a welfare system that favors indigenous French . . . Immigration -- code for Muslim immigration -- was the convention's hot-button issue.
Sylvia Poggioli, "Anti-Immigrant Policy Boosts France's Le Pen Again," NPR, November 22, 2006 --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6522463

The second element is definitiveness. Our political figures say they have to concentrate on an overall, long-term, comprehensive answer to the immigration problem. So they huff and puff about the long-term implications of this move or that, and in the end they do nothing. They are like people in a burning house who sit around discussing the long-term efficacy of various kinds of water hoses while the house burns down around them.
Peggy Noonan, "What Grandma Would Say: We don't need to solve the immigration problem forever. We need to solve it now," The Wall Street Journal, November 24, 2006 --- http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110009288

With political junkies looking ahead to the 2008 presidential race, two of the names often mentioned as leading contenders for the GOP nomination – John McCain and Rudy Giuliani – are being called "disastrous" for the Republican Party by Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo. Both of those individuals, of course, would be disastrous for us for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is their position on immigration, which is to open the border," Tancredo told WND in an exclusive interview.
Joe Kovacs, "Tancredo: McCain, Giuliani would be disastrous for GOP," WorldNetDaily, November 22, 2006 ---
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53039
Jensen Comment
Senator McCain's "open border stance," like a lot of his stances, is no more solid than flubber. He voted both times to build the border fence despised by Mexico and favored heavily by his Arizona constituency. To see how the U.S. Senate (Republicans and Democrats alike) voted overwhelmingly to build a useless wall between the U.S. and Mexico, go to http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/book06q4.htm#BorderFence
Since being for an open border will be political suicide for the 2008 elections, it's entertaining to watch Congress dance the proverbial sidestep. The great majority of our legislators will proudly point to their votes in favor of building a border wall and then find all sorts of excuses not to fund the actual construction. Even more of a hot potato will be amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants already residing in the U.S. I favor a one-time amnesty coupled with elimination of citizenship of babies born to on U.S. soil to mothers who are not citizens. Bush strongly supports amnesty and citizenship to all babies born in the U.S. in the face of overwhelming opposition among voters. Counterfeiters are now cranking out thousands of phony birth certificates daily in anticipation of bringing in more more parents from Mexico. This will be a booming business until babies are not granted automatic citizenship regardless of citizenship status of the parents.

Half of the 91,516 illegal aliens from terror-sponsoring countries and those of "special interest" apprehended at the border between 2001 and 2005 were released into the U.S. population, according to a report by the inspector general's office of the Department of Homeland Security. The report, "Detention and Removal of Illegal Aliens," released earlier this year with little fanfare or attention, suggests about 85 percent of those aliens – potentially the most dangerous – would abscond and likely never be seen by authorities again. Acknowledging the danger such aliens pose to the national security, the report cites a DHS official testifying that terrorist organizations "believe illegal entry into the U.S. is more advantageous than legal entry for operations reasons."
"45,000 terror-threat illegals released into U.S. population: Half from countries of 'special interest' let go between 2001, 2005, says report," WorldNetDaily, November 29, 2006 ---
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53151

A South African man has been fined $140 for taking a week off work, telling his employers he was pregnant. Charles Sibindana, 27, stole a certificate from a clinic during his pregnant girlfriend's checkup, a court near Johannesburg heard. He then added his own details to the note and submitted it and took seven days off work, seemingly unaware that only women consult gynaecologists (sic) . His employers became suspicious and investigated the matter.
"'Pregnant' man fined in SA court," BBC News, November 28, 2006 --- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6190772.stm?lspan
Jensen Comment
This sort of dashes his hopes for maternity leave, but he might still conjure up a miracle by moving to New Orleans.

The truth is as difficult to deny as it is to hide.
Ernesto Che Guevara (1928-1967) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Che_Guevara
Jensen Comment
The number 2,007 cited above is an accurate-sounding number in Iran but does not have any backing among world scholars. French scholar George Wellers was one of the first to use Nazi data on deportations to estimate the number killed at Auschwitz, arriving at 1.613 million dead, including 1.44 million Jews and 146,000 Poles. A larger study started around the same time by Franciszek Piper used time tables of train arrivals combined with deportation records to calculate 1.1 million Jewish deaths and 140,000-150,000 Polish victims, along with 23,000 Roma & Sinti (Gypsies). This number has met with "significant, though not complete" agreement among scholars. Additionally, untold thousands of homosexuals were also killed at Auschwitz.

Iran's President Ahmadinejad is so damaging to Islamic credibility I sometimes wonder if he was not invented by Israel. However, Iran's nuclear threat to Israel is now so grave that Jewish factions are supporting Saudi Arabia's bid for nuclear technology on the Sunni side in the spreading civil war between Sunni Islam and Iranian Shi'a Islam.

Israeli officials this week made two painfully honest nuclear pronouncements. The first -- Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's indirect admission on Monday that Israel had nuclear weapons -- got the lion's share of attention. Another statement, however, was easily as interesting: On Wednesday Israeli officials publicly applauded Saudi Arabia's announcement that it and its Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) neighbors intended to develop "peaceful nuclear energy." Why Jerusalem's endorsement? Because, as Israeli officials explained, these Arab nations' announcement was "directed against Iran." That is, it threatened to check Iran's bomb activities with a Sunni nuclear-weapons option.
Henry Sololski, "Hair-Raising New World," The Wall Street Journal, December 15, 2006; Page A20 --- Click Here

A Canadian professor says he gladly accepted an invitation from Iran's hardline Islamist government to speak at an international conference (December 13) questioning the Holocaust. But Dr. Shiraz Dossa, a soft-spoken political science professor at Nova Scotia's St. Francis Xavier University, said he doesn't put himself in the same category as some of the "hacks and lunatics'' attending the event. The two-day gathering drew some of the world's most notorious Holocaust deniers, Nazi sympathizers and scholars such as former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke. Dossa, the lone Canadian at the event, told The Globe and Mail he presented a paper about how the Holocaust has been used to justify anti-Islamic policies in the U.S. war on terror. The academic said no one pressured him to change his point of view, which he says has nothing to do with Holocaust denial. Dossa describes himself as an admirer of left-wing American scholar Noam Chomsky. He said the paper he presented was about the war on terrorism, and how the Holocaust plays into it. "Other people have their own points of view, but that (Holocaust denial) is not my point of view," he told The Globe.
"Canadian prof shocked by Holocaust gathering," CTV, December 13, 2006 --- Click Here
Also see "Professor’s Attendance at ‘Conference’ Stuns Canada," Inside Higher Ed, December 15, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/14/holocaust

“My essential point is that the Jewish loss — which is, of course, a reality, and anyone who denies it is a lunatic — the focus here is on how the Holocaust is a political construct, distinct from the Jewish loss at the hands of the Nazis. And that political construct has been used to justify certain policies by people, some of whom are Zionists. And now that whole issue plays into the war on terrorism, which is essentially a war on Islam,” he told the newspaper.
Scott Jaschik quoting Shiraz Dossa (Canadian professor who was an invited speaker at Iran's Holocaust denial conference), Inside Higher Ed, December 15, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/14/holocaust

It's scary when you start making the same noises as your coffee maker.
Maxine

It's great to be back in England. I feel like Jack The Ripper days are back. Nothing ever changes here.
Oliver Stone at the British Comedy Award Ceremony. His bad-taste attempt at comedy was met with jeers and gasps of horror from the celebrity audience in light of the recent Suffolk murders.
"Stone's Ripper joke shocks audience," RTE, December 14, 2006 ---http://www.rte.ie/arts/2006/1214/stoneo.html

The New Orleans school system, re-created in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, is beginning to look like something designed by FEMA.
Lisa Delpit and Charles Payne, "Katrina's Last Victims?" The Nation, December 14, 2006 --- http://www.thenation.com/docprem.mhtml?i=20070101&s=delpit

We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
"Full Text: Unabomber's Manifesto," CBS5 San Francisco, November 28, 2006 --- http://cbs5.com/reference/local_story_332145319.html

Mexican lawlessness is reaching epidemic proportions. It is true that AMLO -- as the Mexican press calls the defeated PRD candidate -- is now mostly an unpopular annoyance even to those who voted for him. It is also true that if the PRD wants to remain a serious political party it has to show that it is willing to work within the system. But other violent actors who prefer the path of terror and extortion to gain power and resources are threatening national security. Some of the blame lies with Mr. Fox and his weak response to extreme political groups. Some of it lies with the U.S. demand for illegal drugs, which is fueling an ever more powerful organized-crime problem in a country ill-equipped to fight back.
Mary Anastasia O'Grady, "It's High Noon in Mexico," The Wall Street Journal, December 1, 2006; Page A13 --- Click Here

How Terrorists Use Civilians for Cover and Gullible Media Exploitation
The most persuasive evidence here is photographic, so we urge readers to access the report itself on the Web site of the American Jewish Congress (ajcongress.org). Hezbollah's headquarters in Aita al-Shaab, for instance, sits in the heart of the village. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah's office and home are in a densely built neighborhood of Beirut. In the town of Qana--site of an Israeli bombing on July 30 that killed 28 and that Hezbollah's apologists were quick to label a "massacre"--an arms warehouse can be seen adjacent to a mosque. There are photographs of rockets in the back seats of cars, missile launchers adjacent to farm houses, storage bunkers hidden beneath homes. There is also a trove of before-and-after photography demonstrating the precision of most Israeli bombing.
"Whose War Crimes? Evidence from Lebanon about how terrorists use civilians," The Wall Street Journal, December 11, 2006 --- http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009371

" . . . there are a lot of good things that are happening that aren't covered and I think the drumbeat in the country from the media...is discouraging" as she hoped for "more balanced coverage" in the future.
CyberAlert, December 15, 2006 --- http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2006/cyb20061215.asp

Congressman (Dennis Kucinich) from Cleveland explains an urgent need for human unity, human security and peace motivated him to run for President.
Joshua Scheer, "What Makes Kucinich Run?" The Nation, December 15, 2006 --- http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070101/scheer
Jensen Comment
Yeah right. His utterly hopeless candidacy more likely has more despicable motives.

EVERYONE who laughed when the elfin Dennis Kucinich threw his hat in the ring to run for president in 2004 should realize why he smiles. He had 2,955,963 reasons to smile. That is how many bucks federal taxpayers gave his ridiculous campaign for president. Kucinich had no chance. Yet under the bizarre federal election rules, taxpayers had to give this fool $2,955,963 just to humor his vanity. Ralph Nader took $798,827 from taxpayers in 2004 to indulge his fantasy of being elected president. Consumers beware. I look for this demagogue to run again. Lyndon LaRouche is another likely candidate. Last...
Don Surber, "Demagoguery earns Kucinich millions," Charlestown Mail, December 15, 2006 --- Click Here

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.
Kenneth Boulding (1910-1993) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Boulding

Start Digging and Pave the Streets of the Earth With Gold
Searching for a pot of gold? Try the center of the Earth. More than 99 percent of Earth's gold is missing—it all sank to the center of the planet billions of years ago. In fact, says geologist Bernard Wood of Macquarie University in Australia, there's enough gold in Earth's core to coat its surface in 1.5 feet of the stuff. How did it get there? Earth formed from a series of smaller planetesimals that crashed together over the course of 30 million to 40 million years. Wood deduced how much gold ought to be present in Earth's crust by comparing...
Anne Wootten, "Earth's Inner Fort Knox," Discover Magazine, September 2006 --- http://www.discover.com/issues/sep-06/rd/innerfortknox/

Start Digging on the Moon for Nuclear Fuel
NASA's proposed 2024 moon base will be a steppingstone to Mars, but it may also be a mining outpost. The moon is an abundant source of helium-3, a potent fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors. Trouble is, China, India and Russia have their eyes on it too.
John Lasker, "Race to the Moon for Nuclear Fuel," Wired News, December 15, 2006 --- http://www.wired.com/news/technology/space/0,72276-0.html?tw=wn_index_8

The Best Science Fictions --- http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.12/start.html?pg=15
By Aria Pearson, Wired Magazine, December 2006

Fiction: If you fall into quicksand, you’ll be sucked under and die.
Fact: You’ll only sink up to your waist.

Fiction: Sitting too close to the TV will ruin your eyes.
Fact: It causes fatigue but no permanent damage.

Fiction: Earth’s rotation causes bathtubs, sinks, and toilets to drain clockwise in the northern hemisphere, counterclockwise in the southern hemisphere.
Fact: They can go either way in either hemisphere. The shape of the basin and the direction of the incoming flow overwhelm the minuscule effect of planetary spin.

Fiction: Benjamin Franklin’s kite was struck by lightning.
Fact: The kite picked up electricity from the air, causing an arc between Franklin’s hand and a key tied to his end of the string.

Fiction: A penny dropped from the top of a skyscraper can kill someone.
Fact: It could never pick up enough velocity to kill, just to bang you up a little.

Fiction: Swimming after you eat will cause cramps and lead to drowning.
Fact: There is a very slight risk of cramps, but only for vigorous swimmers.

Fiction: A drunken teenager can tip over a sleeping cow.
Fact: It would take several semisober people and a paralyzed cow. Anyway, cows sleep lying down.

Fiction: There’s a dark side of the moon.
Fact: The entire lunar surface receives sunlight during the moon’s monthly orbit around Earth.

Fiction: Swallowed chewing gum takes seven years to digest.
Fact: Gum is not digested. It passes through the gastro-intestinal system, usually within 24 hours.

Joy to the world
I'm getting laid
I'm getting laid tonight.
We'll light the Yule log
Deck the halls
And then we'll play some
Jingle balls.
It's been a real long wait
This is our second date
It's Christmas Eve
And I'm getting laid.
Charlie Sheen to the tune of a famous Christian hymn, Two and a Half Men, December 11, 2006
"AFA: 'Fornication' song requires network apology," by Bob Unruh, WorldNetDaily, December 16, 2006 --- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53387
Jensen Comment
In addition to being sacrilegious, this illustrates how low prime time "family television shows" have sunk --- they should be X-Rated.

More on Science Fiction
Charlie Sheen is one of the most famous proponents of the 9/11 conspiracy
Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events. Sheen agreed that the biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself and prefaced his argument by quoting Theodore Roosevelt in stating, "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
"Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story," PrisonPlanet, March 20, 2006 --- http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm

Say What? An Ultraliberal Magazine Debunks the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
The Reichstag example also holds a lesson for those who would dismiss the very notion of a conspiracy as necessarily absurd. It was perfectly reasonable to suspect the Nazis of setting the fire, so long as the evidence suggested that might have been the case. The problem isn't with conspiracy theories as such; the problem is continuing to assert the existence of a conspiracy even after the evidence shows it to be virtually impossible.
"9/11: The Roots of Paranoia," by Christopher Hayes, The Nation, December 8, 2006 --- http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061225/hayes

According to a July poll conducted by Scripps News Service, one-third of Americans think the government either carried out the 9/11 attacks or intentionally allowed them to happen in order to provide a pretext for war in the Middle East. This is at once alarming and unsurprising. Alarming, because if tens of millions of Americans really believe their government was complicit in the murder of 3,000 of their fellow citizens, they seem remarkably sanguine about this fact. By and large, life continues as before, even though tens of millions of people apparently believe they are being governed by mass murderers. Unsurprising, because the government these Americans suspect of complicity in 9/11 has acquired a justified reputation for deception: weapons of mass destruction, secret prisons, illegal wiretapping. What else are they hiding?

This pattern of deception has not only fed diffuse public cynicism but has provided an opening for alternate theories of 9/11 to flourish. As these theories--propounded by the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement--seep toward the edges of the mainstream, they have raised the specter of the return (if it ever left) of what Richard Hofstadter famously described as "the paranoid style in American politics." But the real danger posed by the Truth Movement isn't paranoia. Rather, the danger is that it will discredit and deform the salutary skepticism Americans increasingly show toward their leaders.

The Truth Movement's recent growth can be largely attributed to the Internet-distributed documentary Loose Change. A low-budget film produced by two 20-somethings that purports to debunk the official story of 9/11, it's been viewed over the Internet millions of times. Complementing Loose Change are the more highbrow offerings of a handful of writers and scholars, many of whom are associated with Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Two of these academics, retired theologian David Ray Griffin and retired Brigham Young University physics professor Steven Jones, have written books and articles that serve as the movement's canon. Videos of their lectures circulate among the burgeoning portions of the Internet devoted to the cause of the "truthers." A variety of groups have chapters across the country and organize conferences that draw hundreds. In the last election cycle, the website www.911truth.org even produced a questionnaire with pointed inquiries for candidates, just like the US Chamber of Commerce or the Sierra Club. The Truth Movement's relationship to the truth may be tenuous, but that it is a movement is no longer in doubt.

Truth activists often maintain they are simply "raising questions," and as such tend to focus with dogged persistence on physical minutiae: the lampposts near the Pentagon that should have been knocked down by Flight 77, the altitude in Pennsylvania at which cellphones on Flight 93 should have stopped working, the temperature at which jet fuel burns and at which steel melts. They then use these perceived inconsistencies to argue that the central events of 9/11--the plane hitting the Pentagon, the towers collapsing--were not what they appeared to be. So: The eyewitness accounts of those who heard explosions in the World Trade Center, combined with the facts that jet fuel burns at 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit and steel melts at 2,500, shows that the towers were brought down by controlled explosions from inside the buildings, not by the planes crashing into them.

If the official story is wrong, then what did happen? As you might expect, there's quite a bit of dissension on this point. Like any movement, the Truth Movement is beset by internecine fights between different factions: those who subscribe to what are termed LIHOP theories (that the government "let it happen on purpose") and the more radical MIHOP ("made it happen on purpose") contingent. Even within these groups, there are divisions: Some believe the WTC was detonated with explosives after the planes hit and some don't even think there were any planes.

To the extent that there is a unified theory of the nature of the conspiracy, it is based, in part, on the precedent of the Reichstag fire in Germany in the 1930s. The idea is that just as the Nazis staged a fire in the Reichstag in order to frighten the populace and consolidate power, the Bush Administration, military contractors, oil barons and the CIA staged 9/11 so as to provide cause and latitude to pursue its imperial ambitions unfettered by dissent and criticism. But the example of the Reichstag fire itself is instructive. While during and after the war many observers, including officials of the US government, suspected the fire was a Nazi plot, the consensus among historians is that it was, in fact, the product of a lone zealous anarchist. That fact changes little about the Nazi regime, or its use of the fire for its own ends. It's true the Nazis were the chief beneficiaries of the fire, but that doesn't mean they started it, and the same goes for the Bush Administration and 9/11.

The Reichstag example also holds a lesson for those who would dismiss the very notion of a conspiracy as necessarily absurd. It was perfectly reasonable to suspect the Nazis of setting the fire, so long as the evidence suggested that might have been the case. The problem isn't with conspiracy theories as such; the problem is continuing to assert the existence of a conspiracy even after the evidence shows it to be virtually impossible.

Debunking The 9/11 Myths -Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11 --- http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

In India, abortion is not gender neutral
Ten million girls have been killed by their parents in India in the past 20 years, either before they were born or immediately after, a government minister said on Thursday, describing it as a "national crisis" . . . A UNICEF report released this week said 7,000 fewer girls are born in the country every day than the global average would suggest, largely because female foetuses are aborted after sex determination tests but also through murder of new borns.
Palash Kumar, "India has killed 10 mln girls in 20 years," Yahoo News, December 154 2006 --- http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061214/india_nm/india280322

How to check on a charity or church before you donate

International Center for Not-for-Profit Law --- http://www.icnl.org/

FTC Charity Fraud Site --- Search at http://www.ftc.gov/

You can begin with IRS Form 990 disclosures, but these may be more misleading than helpful. You can access them from Guidestar at http://www.guidestar.org/index.jsp

Guidestar also provides salary disclosures for top executives in the charity. However, funds can be diverted by cheats in other ways.

Research Tools
Analyst Reports
Charity Check
Grant Explorer
Data Services
Nonprofit Compensation Reports
Salary Search

"Giving Freely—And Wisely: One site names preachers who may be misusing money and suggests that you 'prayerfully' consider giving to other ministries instead," Jane Bryant Quinn, Newsweek, December 18, 2006, Page 51 --- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16127630/site/newsweek/

Unfortunately, you can't always believe what the (IRS Form) 990 says. It's supposed to show how much the nonprofit spends on actual services, as opposed to fund-raising and administration. But the law isn't much enforced. In a report covering part of the 1990s, the General Accounting Office found that 64 percent of public charities claimed to have zero—zero!—fund-raising expenses. Do you believe that? Neither do I.

Some of the rating services adjust for these problems. Uncharitably, they often slam each other's methods while touting their own. I'm a civilian in these wars, so my advice is to look for good grades from every source. Start your research here:

1. The Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance (Give.org). It currently posts reports on more than 900 nonprofits, testing them by a number of standards including good governance. About 65 percent of them pass. The rest fail, or refuse to be evaluated (a bad sign, no matter what excuse the charity gives).

2. American Institute of Philanthropy (CharityWatch.org). It's the toughest of the bunch, rating more than 500 charities on a scale of A+ down to F. Because it disregards certain, potentially suspect, expenses and donations, it fails some nonprofits that the other raters approve. Readers of this column can get its latest Charity Rating Guide free from AIP, P.O. Box 578460, Chicago, IL 60657.

3. CharityNavigator.org rates 5,100 nonprofits on a scale of zero to four stars. This site draws only from a nonprofit's latest 990 form, which could mislead. But I like its Top Ten lists, such as 10 Charities Overpaying Their For-Profit Fund-Raisers.

4. MinistryWatch.com rates more than 500 evangelical groups on a scale of 1 to 5 stars. It's an ardent advocate for financial disclosure. The site names preachers who may be misusing money and suggests that you "prayerfully" consider other ministries instead. Withholding that advice, says MinistryWatch.com, would be "tantamount to condoning sin." Hear, hear.

5. The Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (Ecfa.org) accredits Evangelical churches and charities based on such standards as audited financial reports and ECFA's own field reviews. If your group hasn't joined (or is on the lists of those that left) you should ask why. There's no comparable service for Jewish, Muslim or Catholic organizations.

You'll find other sources. GuideStar.org gives no ratings, just access to 990s for nearly 700,000 charities. Pennsylvania's Department of State lists nonprofits that ran into trouble there. They may be fund-raising in other states.

Still, most people donate simply because someone asks them to, says William Meehan, chair of Philanthropic Research, parent of GuideStar. Charity ratings haven't had much impact, because they're flawed and not enough people follow them. Besides, the ratings don't help you choose among similar charities. For that, you need to know how well they do their jobs. That's the next step—and a new Web site should help it along. Watch for GreatNonprofits.org, launching next spring. People familiar with specific charities—clients, donors, staff and volunteers—will be able to post opinions there, for you to read before you decide to give.

Continued in article

Bob Jensen's threads on reporting fraudulent charities are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudReporting.htm#CharityFrauds

Question
Do hybrid vehicles (today, at least) appear to be another feel good/do nothing hoax?

Comparisons of Hybrid Fuel Saving Automobiles --- http://avt.inl.gov/pdf/hev/sae_gov_ind_may_2005_hevs.pdf

It's beginning to look like a hoax --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1752922/posts

The drop in performance with air conditioning is considerable. Maybe a Marin County, CA or Cambridge, MA granola cruncher and live without A/C, but in the Sunbelt we cannot. Driving around in 90+ weather with the windows down won’t cut it.
Given that the acclaimed fuel efficiency of hybrids is much less with the air on, I wondered how they compared with standard vehicles. Using Edmunds.com, I made a few direct comparisons. This is interesting stuff…

2003 CIVIC...

2003 Civic Hybrid
Air Off: 47 MPG
Air On: 36 MPG

2003 Civic LS Auto 4 Cyl.
City: 29 MPG
Hwy: 38 MPG
Avg: 33.5 MPG

2005 ACCORD...

2005 Accord Hybrid
Air Off: 29 MPG
Air On: 24 MPG

2005 Accord LX Auto 4 Cyl.
City: 26 MPG
Hwy: 34 MPG
Avg: 30 MPG

2005 Accord LX Auto 6 Cyl.
City: 21 MPG
Hwy: 30 MPG
Avg: 25.5 MPG

2005 SILVARADO...

2005 Silvarado 2WD Hybrid
Air Off: 16 MPG
Air On: 19 MPG

2005 Silvarado 2WD Hybrid
City: 16 MPG
Hwy: 19 MPG
Avg: 17.5 MPG

2005 ESCAPE...

2005 Escape 2WD Hybrid
Air Off: 25 MPG
Air On: 32 MPG

2005 Escape 2WD 3.0L
City: 20 MPG
Hwy: 25 MPG
Avg: 22.5 MPG

COMPARISON...
I compared the hybrid fuel savings with air on to the conventional vehicle’s city/highway average. The Civic and Escape hybrids each got a whopping 2.5 MPG better than the conventional vehicles. The Accord and Silvarado hybrids performed worse!

Civic: Hybrid +2.5 MPG
Accord 4Cyl: Hybrid -6 MPG
Accord 6 Cyl: Hybrid -1.5 MPG
Silvarado: Hybrid -1.5 MPG
Escape: Hybrid +2.5 MPG

In some parts of the country, people may not need air conditioning. Where the air is kept on most of the year, the hybrids aren’t such a good deal. In fact, they may get worse fuel efficiency. And we haven’t even discussed the energy cost to recycle the batteries every eight years.

National security costs hidden in every barrel of oil
In his new book, Lives Per Gallon, former secretary of the California EPA Terry Tamminen examines the health, environmental and national security costs hidden in every barrel of oil. Wired News interview by John Gartner.
John Gartner, "The Pernicious Price of Petroleum," Wired News, December 13, 2006 --- http://www.wired.com/news/technology/autotech/0,72266-0.html?tw=wn_index_29

Google Plants Solar Trees
The search giant joins a growing trend by landscaping its headquarters' parking lots with pole-mounted panels that provide shade and generate clean power in one fell swoop.
Marty Graham, "Google Plants Solar Trees," Wired News, December 13, 2006 --- http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72292-0.html?tw=wn_index_32

Corporate Monopoly: Radio Is Wrecked--But It Can Be Repaired
A handful of homogenized music formats now dominates the airwaves. Jazz, the classics, folk and new rock are hard to find. Listeners are tuning out. John Nichols reports on a new study by musicians and fans that documents how corporate consolidation is killing American radio--and how the FCC can fix it.
John Nichols, "Radio Is Wrecked--But It Can Be Repaired," The Nation, December 15, 2006 ---
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=148791

The knowledge economy of Europe --- http://www.theworkfoundation.com/Assets/PDFs/KE_Europe.pdf
(Including how Europe compares with the U.S. in terms of the knowledge economy.)

Native American Code of Ethics --- http://eveningrain.com/Ethics.html

Saudi Arabia's Method for Terminating Corruption Investigations
Tony Blair, the British prime minister, has said he takes full responsibility for the decision to abandon an investigation into alleged corruption and bribery. The decision to abandon a two-year corruption inquiry into BAE Systems came after Saudi Arabia suggested it might cancel an order for 72 Eurofighter Typhoon jets from BAE Systems.
"Blair defends Saudi arms decision," Al Jazeera, December 16, 2006 ---
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/1E0DDA3F-CA29-4CD9-9F9F-53C7A783F6B2.htm

Bob Jensen's fraud updates are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudUpdates.htm

EU leaders still divided on future
European Union leaders have remained far from united about the future shape of the union, set to grow to 27 members when Bulgaria and Romania join on January 1. On the final day of a summit, there were still divisions about further expansion beyond that date and about whether and how to revive a stalled EU constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters.
"EU leaders still divided on future," Al Jazeera, December 15, 2006 ---
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3BFC3168-27AB-48A2-A1C0-9BC7EBC7DCA2.htm

Taxation of Dividends Creates European Union Stir
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (ICAI) said that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling this week on the UK dividends case creates issues for other European countries, including Ireland, which have a similar system of taxation of dividends to that in the UK. The ECJ ruled on the principles of freedom of establishment and freedom of movement of capital in relation to the UK dividends system. See further details in our full news item.
Andy Lymer, "ECJ DIVIDENDS CASE CREATES ISSUES FOR IRELAND," AccountingEducation.com, December 14, 2006 --- http://accountingeducation.com/index.cfm?page=newsdetails&id=144069

True deficit: $3.5 trillion: Analyst says coming Treasury report will document 'unsustainable' pace
A report scheduled to be released by the Treasury Department tomorrow is expected to show the true deficit in the Bush administration's 2006 federal budget to be an astounding $3.5 trillion in the red, not $248.2 billion as previously reported.
Jerome R. Corsey, "True deficit: $3.5 trillion," WorldNetDaily, December 14, 2006 ---
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53366

Johns Hopkins Gets a Separate B-School
What's better than one Carey B-school? How about another one? The same person who endowed the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State has done it again, this time at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. Johns Hopkins officials said Dec. 5 that the school received a $50 million donation from trustee emeritus William Polk Carey to go toward the creation of the university's first separate business school. Carey is chairman of New York real estate investment firm W.P. Carey & Co.
Julie Gordon, "Johns Hopkins Gets a Separate B-School," Business Week, December 5, 2006 --- http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/dec2006/bs20061205_466430.htm?link_position=link4
Jensen Comment
What a tough challenge! Can you imagine trying to hire a new business school faculty from scratch? It is absolutely certain that Johns Hopkins will want prestigious faculty. It will be interesting to see who they snare. About three weeks ago I flew into Baltimore and took a limo down to Crystal City, Virginia. I was truly impressed by the number of trees in full foliage. Our leaves blew off the trees over six weeks ago.

In spite of legislation and voter mandates, universities will always have race-based affirmative action

As we wrote at the time, "a cynic might conclude that the decisions mean universities can still discriminate as long as they're not too obvious about it." That is exactly what Wayne State is doing. Its new law school admission guidelines, unveiled last week, avoid mention of race and other preference criteria explicitly banned by Prop 2. Instead, applicants will be invited to describe their family's socio-economic status and educational history, past experiences of discrimination, any foreign languages spoken at home, etc.
"The Racial Runaround The University of Michigan isn't accepting voters' rejection of affirmative action," The Wall Street Journal, December 15, 2006 --- http://opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110009387

Bob Jensen's threads on affirmative action in college admissions and grading are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm#AcademicStandards

The press is an evil for which there is no remedy. Liberty depends upon freedom of the press and that cannot be limited without being lost.
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson

"The Media Is in Need of Some Mending," by Peter R. Kann, The Wall Street Journal, December 11, 2006; Page A18 --- Click Here

At its best news informs and enlightens the citizens of a free society and thereby safeguards and strengthens our democracy. At its worst -- dishonest, unfair, irresponsible -- the media has potential to erode the public trust on which its own success depends and to corrode the democratic system of which it is so indispensably a part. So, let me touch on 10 current trends in the mass media that ought to disturb us.

The blurring of the lines between journalism and entertainment. Journalism that puts too high a priority on entertaining is almost destined to distort and mislead. Compounding this confusion is a diffusing definition of "journalist." When political operatives moonlight at moderating news shows, when people alternate between being political editors and political consultants, when celebrity newspeople pocket $20,000 fees speaking at corporate conventions while criticizing congressman for conflicts of interest -- we jumble public perceptions of newspeople as well as news.

The blurring of lines between news and opinion. Newspapers have a format that helps maintain the distinction. The Internet, TV and most magazines have neither that format nor that tradition. The result is a blending of news and views. The two are not ingredients to mix together for a tastier meal, they are different courses. Part of the problem here lies in fashionable new philosophies that argue there are no basic values of right and wrong, that news is merely a matter of views. It's a dangerous philosophy for our society and a dagger at the heart of genuine journalism.

The blending of news and advertising, sponsorships or other commercial relationships. The resulting porridges may be called "advertorials" or "infomercials"; they may be special sections masquerading as news, news pages driven by commercial interests, or Web pages where everything somehow is selling something. Without clear distinctions between news and advertising, readers or viewers lose confidence in the veracity of a news medium. And advertisers lose the business benefit of an environment of trust.

The problems and pitfalls inherent in pack journalism. Individually, most reporters are decent, dedicated, fair-minded people. But the press, en masse, tends to lose its common sense and its sense of fairness and independence and what we see all too often is the spectacle of a pack of hounds in pursuit of a quarry. We frequently see this phenomenon in political reporting, where the faintest whiff of scandal, or even of weakness, can send the pack in pursuit. At its worst, the pack, not finding a real problem, proclaims the "perception" of one and this perception becomes self-fulfilling.

The issue of conflict and context. On most issues most Americans are not on polar extremes. On abortion, for example, most seek a sensible center. Where is that center reflected in media coverage that mainly portrays rabid feminists or irate pro-life activists? Balance is not achieved by the talk show format of two extremists yelling at each other. And how many of us recognize our own communities from their depiction on local TV news shows -- a nonstop montage of mayhem, murder, rape, arson, child molestation and more?

The exaggerated tendency toward pessimism. Just look back a few years over much of the media coverage of "American competitiveness." All those news magazine covers on the coming "Japanese Century." And along with it, all the pessimism about the ability of U.S. industry to compete globally. It was nonsense. Similarly, it's one thing -- and an appropriate one -- for the press to probe particular instances of political corruption. It's quite another thing to jump to the cynical conclusion that our political process, and all politicians, are corrupted -- that "they all do it." They don't, and they aren't. Skepticism and criticism are essential to the media's role; reflexive pessimism is not.

The growing media fascination with the bizarre, the perverse and the pathological -- John Mark Karr journalism. Such so-called journalism helps instantly legitimize crackpot ideas, deviant behavior, or alleged victimization in our society. My point is not to argue for "good news" vs. "bad news," but to ask whether much of this amounts to news at all?

Social orthodoxy, or political correctness. These are reflected in a media whose job is not to parrot prevailing fashions, but to question, probe and thereby challenge them. Businessmen are not, by definition, greedy, and environmentalists, by definition, saintly. Third World poverty is not, by definition, a result of overpopulation as opposed to inane economic policies. And so on.

The media's short attention span. As the press hops from Baghdad to Beirut, Natalee Holloway to Valerie Plame, Super Bowls to Super Tuesdays, it justifiably can blame some combination of the nature of the news and the short attention span of the public. The public, meanwhile, bombarded and bewildered can blame a fickle and shallow press. There are too many instant celebrities. Too many two-day crises. Too many "defining moments" from people in search of instant history. In a world where everything is considered critical, nothing needs to be taken very seriously.

The matter of power. The press is at least partially responsible for greater public skepticism toward traditional institutions in America. But the truth, not lost on our public, is that the press is a large and powerful institution, too: "60 Minutes" is more powerful than almost all of the subjects it exposes. This newspaper, arguably, has more influence on national economic policy than do most corporations. Networks are owned by giant industrial corporations, magazines by entertainment conglomerates, and most newspapers by national chains. Given these realties, we cannot plausibly pretend to be a David out there smiting Goliaths and expect the public to believe it.

Mr. Kann, a Pulitzer-winning journalist, is chairman of Dow Jones.

Question
What is IBM's new super computer called Deep Thunder?

"Personalized Weather Forecasts: An IBM supercomputer forecasts weather down to a one-kilometer resolution," by Duncan Graham-Rowe, MIT's Technology Review, December 12, 2006 --- http://www.technologyreview.com/InfoTech/17885/

IBM has launched a new weather service called Deep Thunder that can predict the rain, the wind, and temperature conditions down to a one-kilometer resolution. In time, IBM researchers say they should even be able to nail the resolution down to individual streets.

The idea is to provide weather-sensitive businesses in metropolitan areas with information that's more accurate than what government agencies are capable of providing, says Lloyd Treinish, a researcher at IBM's TJ Watson Research Center, in Yorktown Heights, NY.

At a local submetropolitan level, the weather really can vary quite significantly, says Treinish. Yet typical forecasts will often slap a single simplistic symbol, such as the sun, a cloud, or a snowflake, on an area representing a small city.

A huge number of businesses really depend on accurate weather forecasts, says Stephen Lord, director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Environmental Modeling Center, in Camp Springs, MD. Transportation, energy distribution, shipping, and even sporting events are all at the mercy of the weather, he says. Indeed, as much as $1 trillion worth of the U.S. economy is weather sensitive, says Treinish. By providing more-detailed forecasts, IBM hopes to help businesses streamline their operations and save money.

For example, local municipal services such as snowplowing could be deployed more efficiently with more-detailed information about precisely where snow will fall. Similarly, by being more prepared, utility companies could better manage energy demand and better cope with outages caused by severe weather. Even airports and postal services would benefit: they could plan and schedule operations around weather conditions.

Government agencies, such as the National Weather Service (NWS), are currently unable to provide the same level of detail. This is partly because they don't have the technical resources, but it's also because they are mandated to offer a uniform level of service across the nation, preventing them from providing higher resolutions for some areas and not others. Even at a metropolitan level, where local meteorological services try to improve on NWS forecasts by factoring in local measurements and conditions, the resolution is rarely much better than eight kilometers, says Treinish.

When combined, all these factors represent a gap in the market that companies like IBM could fill by tailoring their services to individual businesses. "We want to think about the information in relation to solving particular business problems," says Treinish.

Continued in article

Deep Thunder --- http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/deepthunder/

The FAQ answers about Deep Thunder are at http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/deepthunder/faq.html

What is most important is to scroll down the above FAQ page to view the amazing graphics.

Jensen Comment
To see the limited examples now available, I clicked on the "Try It Now" link. After I agreed to terms and conditions, a map showing three metropolitan areas appeared. I tried it for Kansas City. Then I chose President Truman's birthplace in Independence, Missouri. Instructions are fairly detailed.

If you're interested in news about related IBM alphaWorks technologies, probably the best thing to do is create a personalized RSS feed at http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/rss

What struck me is how this supercomputing technology may be expanded to services other than weather reports. Within each square kilometer we may one day get reports on entertainment, real estate development, local government initiatives, business services, traffic reports, museums, parks, crime reports, etc. Eventually there may even be investment reports, accounting data in XBRL markups, etc. You might even be able to peer, God forbid, into my front window and watch Bob Jensen in long underwear typing out these Tidbits while looking over the snow at this morning's spectacular sunrise and dreaming of a Deep Thunder forecast of summer's wild roses.

Bob Jensen's threads on travel and weather are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob3.htm

December 12, 2006 message from David Raggay [draggay@TSTT.NET.TT]

Any one aware of any outstanding train the trainer programs?

Regards,

David

December 12, 2006 reply from Bob Jensen

Hi David,

I personally am turned off by some of these so-called train-the-trainer programs and speakers who are long on form and shallow on substance, particularly those who sometimes receive over $10,000 for a presentation on the latest Harvard Business Review fads. The worst presentations, in my viewpoint, are some of those hired for executive conferences, AACSB programs, and on rare occasions AAA plenary sessions (there was a flood of people streaming out early from one of these plenary sessions at the annual meetings in August 2004.)

If you really want to pursue this type of thing you might contact Chad Herman at Carnegie Mellon University. He’s a specialist in Business Communication --- http://homepage.mac.com/chadhermann/iblog/

Keeping in mind that top teachers are not always the best presenters, I would still try to study in some way professors who are deemed truly outstanding teachers. Some may have helpful Websites. Some may be willing to share thoughts with you (us?) if approached diplomatically. Some may even appear at a program sponsored by you down at Trinidad.

Business Week attempted to identify the top teachers in business schools --- My Favorite Professor

An accounting winner was Joe Ben Hoyle at the University of Richmond according to Business Week, September 20, 2006 --- Click Here
Also see http://oncampus.richmond.edu/~jhoyle

I previously mentioned the popularity of accounting professor Merle Hopkins at the University of Southern California. He also is rated a "Favorite Professor" by Business Week.

Edward Hums at Notre Dame is an accounting "Favorite Professor."

C.J. Skender at the University of North Carolina is an accounting "Favorite Professor."
(He cheats by handing out candy bar bribes.)

And my personal favorite is Amy Dunbar at the University of Connecticut (tax). She can do it all --- live lectures and online. She’s also a veteran user of education technologies.

Things I bet you did not know Google can do for you

December 10, 2006 message from Glen Gray [glen.gray@CSUN.EDU]

There is a great little article at http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=675528&rl=1 that outlines many of the special searches you can do on www.google.com

Glen L. Gray, PhD, CPA
Dept. of Accounting & Information Systems
College of Business & Economics California State University,
Northridge Northridge, CA 91330-8372 818.677.3948
http://www.csun.edu/~vcact00f

Google is a great search engine, but it's also more than that. Google has tons of hidden features, some of which are quite fun and most of which are extremely useful— if you know about them. How do you discover all these hidden features within the Google site?
See http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=675528&rl=1

Google Is a Calculator

Google Knows Mathematical Constants

Google Converts Units of Measure

Google Is a Dictionary

Google Is a Glossary

Google Lists All the Facts

Google Displays Weather Reports

Google Knows Current Airport Conditions

Google Tracks Flight Status

Google Tracks Packages

Google Is a Giant Phone Directory

Google Knows Area Codes

Google Has Movie Information

Google Loves Music

Google Knows the Answer to the Ultimate Question

Google Advanced Search

Language Tools --- http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en

Web Images Video News Maps Desktop more --- http://www.google.com/
Books, Froogle, Groups, Scholar even more --- Click on "More" at http://www.google.com/

Google Maps --- http://www.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&tab=wl&q=

How KB Home CEO's pay went through the roof
KB Home may be the fifth-largest U.S. home builder, but it was No. 1 when it came to pay for its chief executive. Over the last three years, former CEO Bruce Karatz made $232.6 million in compensation.
Kathy M. Kristof and Annette Haddad, LA Times, December 17, 2006 --- http://www.latimes.com/services/site/premium/access-registered.intercept

Jensen Comment
I'd be more impressed if KB homes bought back the fundamentally-flawed cracked foundations of all those defective homes built in Texas --- http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load/build/msg0122380524478.html?12

Bob Jensen's threads on outrageous executive compensation are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudConclusion.htm#OutrageousCompensation

Auto and Truck Repair and Advice --- http://www.econofix.com/
(includes a module on how to listen for problems)

Google added historic map overlays to its free interactive online globe of the world to provide views of how places have changed with time.
"Google Earth maps history," PhysOrg, November 14, 2006 --- http://physorg.com/news82706337.html

Google Earth --- http://earth.google.com/

Bob Jensen's search helpers are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/searchh.htm

"Credit Card 101: Advice Before Shopping," AccountingWeb, November 22, 2006 ---
http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=102824
Repeated in this edition of Tidbits because it is so important!!!

Bob Jensen's threads on the dirty secrets of credit card and credit scoring companies are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudReporting.htm#FICO

Parent Resource Page for Daycare Centers --- http://www.fccimn.com/parentresource.htm

"How to Bring Our Schools Out of the 20th Century," by Claudia Wallis and Sonja Steptoe, Time Magazine Cover Story, December 10, 2006 --- Click Here

Right now we're aiming too low. Competency in reading and math--the focus of so much No Child Left Behind (NCLB) testing--is the meager minimum. Scientific and technical skills are, likewise, utterly necessary but insufficient. Today's economy demands not only a high-level competence in the traditional academic disciplines but also what might be called 21st century skills. Here's what they are:

Knowing more about the world. Kids are global citizens now, even in small-town America, and they must learn to act that way. Mike Eskew, CEO of UPS, talks about needing workers who are "global trade literate, sensitive to foreign cultures, conversant in different languages"--not exactly strong points in the U.S., where fewer than half of high school students are enrolled in a foreign-language class and where the social-studies curriculum tends to fixate on U.S. history.

Thinking outside the box. Jobs in the new economy--the ones that won't get outsourced or automated--"put an enormous premium on creative and innovative skills, seeing patterns where other people see only chaos," says Marc Tucker, an author of the skills-commission report and president of the National Center on Education and the Economy. Traditionally that's been an American strength, but schools have become less daring in the back-to-basics climate of NCLB. Kids also must learn to think across disciplines, since that's where most new breakthroughs are made. It's interdisciplinary combinations--design and technology, mathematics and art--"that produce YouTube and Google," says Thomas Friedman, the best-selling author of The World Is Flat.

Becoming smarter about new sources of information. In an age of overflowing information and proliferating media, kids need to rapidly process what's coming at them and distinguish between what's reliable and what isn't. "It's important that students know how to manage it, interpret it, validate it, and how to act on it," says Dell executive Karen Bruett, who serves on the board of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, a group of corporate and education leaders focused on upgrading American education.

Developing good people skills. EQ, or emotional intelligence, is as important as IQ for success in today's workplace. "Most innovations today involve large teams of people," says former Lockheed Martin CEO Norman Augustine. "We have to emphasize communication skills, the ability to work in teams and with people from different cultures."

Can our public schools, originally designed to educate workers for agrarian life and industrial-age factories, make the necessary shifts? The Skills commission will argue that it's possible only if we add new depth and rigor to our curriculum and standardized exams, redeploy the dollars we spend on education, reshape the teaching force and reorganize who runs the schools. But without waiting for such a revolution, enterprising administrators around the country have begun to update their schools, often with ideas and support from local businesses. The state of Michigan, conceding that it can no longer count on the ailing auto industry to absorb its poorly educated and low-skilled workers, is retooling its high schools, instituting what are among the most rigorous graduation requirements in the nation. Elsewhere, organizations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Asia Society are pouring money and expertise into model programs to show the way.

What It Means to Be a Global Student

Continued in article

A national survey of freshmen has found that what they most value in a college education is professional preparation, followed by academic quality and affordability. The survey was conducted by Eduventures, a consulting company.
Inside Higher Ed, December 12, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/12/qt

"The Failure of Critical Thinking," by John V. Lombardi, Inside Higher Ed, December 12, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/12/12/lombardi

The current controversies over admission practices of elite public and private institutions illustrate what happens when we allow ourselves to fight about the wrong things. This lack of critical thinking begins with a false premise and continues with an attack on institutions that do not conform to the false premise. Sometimes, rather than pointing out the false premise, institutions and their leaders react defensively as if the false premise were correct. Both attacker and respondent in this circumstance fail the test of critical thinking.

The error is usually at the beginning. Someone ( most recently the Education Trust, but the list of commentators who have taken the same tack is long) asserts that elite public universities should be admitting as many poor people as there are in the population of high school graduates in their states. Having asserted this erroneous notion, they compile data (that may also be flawed) using often unreliable methodologies, and issue a manifesto damning elite public universities because they don’t meet the original false premise. Rather than pointing out the error, some elite universities, sensing a politically correct risk, counter with data showing how much they do to recruit and subsidize the poor people who want to come to their university.

All this is not very helpful in addressing issues of access and affordability. We do indeed have to pay attention to the possibility that some graduates of high school who have the preparation and interest might be priced out of an opportunity to acquire a quality higher education, either by virtue of a high net cost of attendance or by the imposition of admissions standards that less affluent students find difficult to meet. This, however, is not a problem that belongs to elite public or private universities alone but is a challenge faced by all the providers of higher education in America. To focus on elite institutions is to make some pernicious and inaccurate assumptions about all the other institutions of higher education.

If we assume that everyone should have an equal opportunityto attend an elite public or private institution (since both are heavily subsidized by taxpayers), then we must also assume that attendance at a non-elite public or private institution represents an unsatisfactory and therefore unequal outcome for a student. If the community colleges, state colleges, non-flagship state institutions, and many non-elite private colleges represent an unsatisfactory and inequitable opportunity, compared to what we call elite institutions, that would seem to require us to assume that they do a poor job of educating students; that the results of their educational efforts are second rate; and that anyone who attends such places is sure to be deficient upon graduation. This kind of thinking may reflect the snobbery of some elite groups who can’t imagine a good education coming from a campus of the California State University system, or a fine education at a combination of Greenfield Community College and Westfield State College in Massachusetts. Such an assumption also reflects a profound ignorance about the actual academic performance of the students who graduate from these “non-elite” institutions.

The notion of “elite institution” deserves some attention. We who live and work in institutions labeled elite have every reason to accept the premise that only an education in our remarkable places is worth having even if we can present little evidence to demonstrate that our elite characteristics result in higher performance after graduation. Research that attempts to demonstrate the higher value of elite compared to non-elite education seems to indicate that while some people may benefit from instruction at a small private elite college, most students do just about as well after graduation, all other things being equal, whether they go to elite or non-elite institutions.

The elite status of an institution comes from its ability to spend more money than institutions deemed “non-elite.” These expenditures do indeed make a different institution. For example, a state flagship institution may have its faculty teaching only half time, assigning the other half time to research. The student activities supported by the elite institution may be more elaborate, the residential spaces more elegant, the quality of the buildings and other facilities more impressive, the student recreation center more comprehensive, and the intercollegiate sports program more nationally visible. These amenities define elite status for undergraduates, and many assume that the amenities reflect academic quality. Students and their parents like these amenities, they ask about them when they visit campus, and they appear willing to pay a premium for the opportunity to participate in the residential life of an elite university. Still, the data that would tell us that the students really learn more and will do much better after graduation as a result of these amenities is not very persuasive.

If we figure the cost of attendance at one of these elite institutions and compare it to the cost of attending a community college and state college, near where the student lives and where the student can hold down a job, we find that the best educational bargain by far is the community college-state college combination.

When we worry about whether poor people can get access to college, some imagine that a zero cost of attendance will solve the problem. That doesn’t really work. Even when an institution pays for the tuition and fees, including room and board, for students below some income marker, these students still come up short an additional $10K to make up for the opportunity cost of living away from home and losing the income from a regular 12-month part-time or full-time job. The public cost of subsidizing elite education for all is very high for rather limited gains. And, of course, there are not enough spots in what we call elite institutions to accommodate all the deserving students of all income levels.

Because space is limited, even in elite public institutions with enrollments over 40,000, the institutions select students based on various criteria, some related to geography, some related to ethnicity, some related to academic preparation, and some related to athletic skill. It would certainly be possible to add other criteria to this list to try and achieve an equal opportunity for all students. However, the only truly “fair” admission process would do what we suggested in an earlier Reality Check: fill the class using random selection from a pool composed of all high school graduates who meet the institution’s minimum admission criteria. There is a certain simplistic charm to this notion.

Continued in article

Bob Jensen's threads on college admission affirmative action controversies are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm#AcademicStandards

Writing Guidelines for Engineering and Science Students --- http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/

Novel Ideas aids for writers (with audio) --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6484932

Bob Jensen's writing helpers are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob3.htm#Dictionaries

Helpers for Managing a Restaurant
Restaurant Doctor --- http://www.restaurantdoctor.com/index.html

Bob Jensen's online training links are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Crossborder.htm#Training

DealBook is a financial news service produced by The New York Times.
It is published daily, Monday-Friday, except on U.S. Market holidays and during the last week of the year. A daily digest of DealBook is also available via email, delivered before the market opens.
The New York Times --- http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/

Bob Jensen's investment helpers are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob1.htm

White Collar Crime Pays Even If You Get Caught
(It's similar to arresting a Mafia boss in Italy)

"Despite convictions, Rigases live in the lap of luxury," by Jerry Zremski, Buffalo News, December 3, 2006 --- http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20061203/1074150.asp

Instead of facing immediate prison time, experts say Rigases might win a new trial.

Nearly two and a half years after being convicted of bank fraud and other corporate crimes, former Buffalo Sabres owner John J. Rigas and his son Timothy remain comfortably at home in Coudersport, Pa., awaiting the results of their appeal.

Meanwhile, many other executives who found themselves on the government's rap sheet in recent years - Andrew Fastow of Enron, Bernard Ebbers of WorldCom, Dennis Kozlowski of Tyco are all behind bars.

What's more, lawyers close to the Rigas case and independent experts are now entertaining a possibility that, to trial-watchers, seemed laughable at the time of the Rigases' conviction in July 2004: that they could win their appeal and thus face a retrial.

While it's rare for a federal appeals court to reverse a criminal conviction, it's also rare for a court to take nearly six months to decide such a matter. Yet that's how long ago a three-judge appellate panel in New York City heard the Rigas appeal, and some lawyers think the long wait for a decision is indication that the court is taking the appeal very seriously.

"Usually, you expect a decision in a case like this in about a month and a half," said Mark Mahoney, the Buffalo attorney who won freedom for one of the Adelphia Communications Corp. defendants, Michael Mulcahey. "The delay means they are taking more time because the issues here are somewhat knotty."

Of course, the elaborate frauds concocted at Enron, WorldCom and Tyco are inherently knotty, but courts were able to unravel them sufficiently to make sure that the convicts in each case went to prison comparatively quickly.

Ebbers was convicted in March 2005, lost an appeal and was sent to a federal prison in Louisiana in September.

Fastow was sentenced in September and joined Ebbers in Oakdale Federal Detention Facility this month.

And Kozlowski was sent to Mid-State Correctional Facility in Marcy within weeks after his 2005 conviction and even before he appealed.

There's one thing that separates all those cases from the one that ensnared the Rigases, who ran Adelphia, a huge cable company based in Coudersport. Their appeal raises a serious legal question that even the judge in their trial agreed ought to be heard.

At a little-noticed court hearing in July 2005, a month after he sentenced John Rigas to 15 years and Timothy Rigas to 20 years in prison, Judge Leonard B. Sand allowed them to go free on bail pending their appeal.

He said he did so because the defense raised a novel argument: the government persuaded the jury to convict the Rigases of fraud and conspiracy based on their violations of generally accepted accounting principles but never called an expert witness to explain what those principles are.

At the hearing, Sand said he didn't necessarily buy that argument, but added it "is something that I can't call frivolous."

Mahoney said "a lot of people felt it was generous" when Sand let the Rigases out on bail, because it's rare that people convicted in the federal courts win that sort of freedom.

Denise O'Donnell, a former U.S. attorney in the Western District of New York, agreed.

"There is a presumption against bail in the federal system, so the Rigases had a very high hurdle to overcome just to get released pending the appeal," she said.

The fact that they were released shows that they "raised a substantive question of law" that could lead to the reversal of their conviction, O'Donnell added.

Attorneys for the Rigases spelled out that question at a hearing before a three-judge federal appeals panel on June 13.

Without an expert witness explaining accounting rules, "the jury was never put in a position to decide whether the Rigases' conduct was proper or improper," argued John Nields, the lawyer for Timothy Rigas.

Richard Owens, the prosecutor in the case, countered by saying the government didn't want to prolong an already lengthy trial by starting "a battle of the experts."

Three federal judges are still pondering that argument, and independent legal experts agreed with the Rigas attorneys that the appeal needs to be taken seriously.

"I was surprised" that such an expert witness wasn't called, said Eugene O'Connor, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches law and accounting at Canisius College. "The question I have is: How is the jury to assess with some certainty that these men violated the accounting standards?"

Then again, the prosecution laid out a case that, in the court of public opinion at least, might be seen as difficult to refute.

Arguing that the Rigases treated Adelphia as their "private piggy bank," Owens showed that John Rigas billed the company for his Columbia House record club and used the corporate jet to send Christmas trees to his daughter in New York City.

Timothy Rigas, meanwhile, dipped into corporate funds to purchase 100 pairs of luxury slippers and a flight meant to impress an actress friend.

In total, prosecutors said the Rigases "looted" Adelphia of $100 million while hiding $2.3 billion in debt and misleading banks and investors about Adelphia's earnings.

The jury convicted John and Timothy Rigas of 18 of the 23 charges against them. A mistrial was declared in the case of another Rigas son, Michael, who later pleaded guilty and was sentenced to home confinement.

That's not entirely different than what John and Timothy Rigas are currently facing. Paul Shechtman, John Rigas' appeals lawyer, said both John and Timothy Rigas are still in Coudersport.

"Under the circumstances, John is doing as well as can be expected," Shechtman said. "He's enjoying his grandchildren."

Of course, those circumstances could change at any time. Lawyers close to the case said they don't know what to think about the fact that the appeals court is taking so much time to render a decision.

"It's usually a good sign," Shechtman said. "I know they've issued opinions in cases that were heard after ours in several instances."

However, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals is especially busy and may simply want to take its time poring over the record of the four-month trial, several lawyers said.

One thing is for sure: if the appeals court rules for the Rigases and orders a retrial, it will be issuing an opinion that will have ramifications far beyond the borough of 2,600 that the Rigases call home.

"It would be a huge decision with wide ramifications in financial fraud cases," O'Donnell said. "I can't think of any other similar case where this could happen."

It was the largest fine ever imposed on an auditing firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP incurred the wrath of federal regulators Tuesday over public statements that appeared to shift the blame away from the auditing firm for failed audits of Adelphia Communications Corp. and Just for Feet Inc. Deborah Harrington, a Deloitte spokeswoman, said regulators requested that the firm revise the first press release it put out. The second release omitted some disputed statements. Deloitte, the U.S. accounting branch of Big Four accounting firm Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Tuesday agreed to pay $50 million to settle charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it failed to detect fraud at Adelphia. It was the largest fine ever imposed on an auditing firm.
"SEC Rebukes Deloitte on Adelphia Audit Spin," SmartPros, April 28, 2005 --- http://accounting.smartpros.com/x48015.xml

You can read more about why white collar crime pays at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudConclusion.htm#CrimePays

You can read more about the Rigas' crimes and the Adelphia accounting scandals at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/fraud001.htm#Deloitte

The Meaning of Mean (Professors)
"No, you didn't," says a girl in the back row, admiringly, while a few others clap, saying the first student has done what they wish they had the courage to do. "I'm paying $50,000 of my own money for this education," one says. "What these professors don't realize is that they're working for me! I'm the customer!" "Oh, my goodness," I'm saying. "Oh, my goodness." Customer service? What is this, a tire store?
Marie Laskas, "The Meaning of Mean," The Washington Post, December 7, 2006 --- Click Here

"Plagiarism and 'Atonement'," by Eugene Volokh, The Wall Street Journal, December 12, 2006; Page A18 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116588497688347029.html?mod=opinion&ojcontent=otep

Two nurses, both aspiring novelists, helped tend British soldiers during World War II. Briony, the protagonist of Ian McEwan's award-winning novel "Atonement," is fictional. The late Lucilla Andrews is real: She became an author, pioneering romantic "hospital fiction," and also wrote a memoir of her war years. Therein lies the latest plagiarism scandalette to hit the news, sparked by an article in the British press. To be a credible character in a historical novel, Briony had to do the things wartime nurses did, and see the things they saw. It is no surprise that Mr. McEwan read Andrews's book when researching his own; and several passages from his book strongly resemble passages from her memoir.

"Our 'nursing' seldom involved more than dabbing gentian violet on ringworm, aquaflavine emulsion on cuts and scratches, lead lotion on bruises and sprains," wrote Andrews (to give one example). "In the way of medical treatments, she had already dabbed gentian violet on ringworm, aquaflavine emulsion on a cut, and painted lead lotion on a bruise. But mostly she was a maid," wrote Mr. McEwan.

Plagiarism? Legally actionable? Ethically reprehensible? Bad manners? Or good research, needed to produce accurate historical fiction?

Plagiarism is easy to condemn but often hard to define. This is partly because the legal rules differ sharply from the ethical ones, and the ethical rules in scholarship, journalism and fiction differ from each other. And it is partly because the rules for using the facts uncovered by writers of history -- whether memoirists, historians or contemporaneous journalists -- must be different from the rules for using the original phrases that the writers created.

Let's start with the law. It generally bans not plagiarism as such, but rather copyright infringement. (Trademark law might play a role in extreme plagiarism cases, but not in the typical ones.) And copyright infringement is both broader and narrower than what most people see as "plagiarism."

For instance, an author can be held liable under copyright law even when he credits the original source from which he copies. The law concerns itself more with protecting authors' ability to profit from their works than with ensuring credit where credit is due. So if I translate Mr. McEwan's novel into Russian without his permission, trumpeting Mr. McEwan's authorship and saying that I am merely the translator, I am a copyright infringer, though not a plagiarist.

On the other hand, an author is not liable for copying the facts that others have discovered, regardless of whether he gives credit. Copyright law doesn't give authors exclusive rights to facts, because such a monopoly would undermine debate, scholarship and literature. If I write a scholarly legal article that uses without attribution historical facts uncovered by another scholar, my failure to attribute is a serious ethical breach -- but not copyright infringement.

So on to professional ethics, which properly differs depending on the profession. Academics have the most stringent obligations. If I write an academic work using, without attribution, facts uncovered by another historian, I commit two sins: First, I falsely claim originality for my own work. Second, I wrongly deny a scholar credit that is important to the scholar's reputation. The academic must therefore scrupulously attribute those facts that others have uncovered, and the long and heavily footnoted format of academic books and articles makes this easy.

But the rules for newspaper articles that mention historical matters are different. Such articles usually don't claim originality of historical research; no reader would assume that snippets of history in an article about modern-day Iraq stem from the journalist's own archival research. The articles do not generally deny historians due professional credit: Scholars get professional respect chiefly based on other scholars' use of their work, not based on citations by reporters. And because space is short, and good journalism often relies on multiple historical sources, newspaper articles can't be expected to acknowledge each historian whose work the journalist used.

The rules for novels are in between. Novelists are similar to journalists, but they do have space at the end of the book to briefly acknowledge the historical works on which they rely, without distracting from the novel's flow. If you've relied substantially on another's work, acknowledging this is the kind thing to do. Omitting the acknowledgment probably isn't unethical; it's not a lie, or the denial of the credit needed for success in the original author's profession. But it isn't very nice.

Yet what about copying not just facts, but also another author's words, either literally or in a close paraphrase? Would a general acknowledgment at the end of the book be enough to justify this? Or is such copying impermissible, at least unless you expressly note it using quotation marks, or by writing "as Lucilla Andrews said"? In academic work, the answer is simple: Quote the original, and insert a footnote at the place you quote it. But what about a novel?

A historical novel, to be accurate, must borrow those words needed to accurately reproduce the historical facts, even when the facts were uncovered by others. If nurses treated ringworm by dabbing gentian violet on it, that's what they did, and novelists must be able to say so. Nor can a novelist note the borrowing using quotation marks and footnotes, as they would interrupt the novel's flow. Writers who strive for factual accuracy must thus remain free to closely paraphrase the factual accounts of others.

On the other hand, when the historian or memoirist depicted the facts in a colorful way that she herself created, the particular words shouldn't be copied, at least without express acknowledgment. A historical novelist is responsible for creating his own colorful descriptions.

So where does this leave Mr. McEwan? Likely not guilty on any of the counts, if the account in the newspaper that first broke the story (the Nov. 26 Daily Mail) is thorough. Mr. McEwan borrowed facts, and those words that accurately described the facts. He is not guilty of copyright infringement, or of taking another's original expression without specific notation. And while he did rely on Andrews's autobiography, his acknowledgments page noted being "indebted" to Andrews and her book. Any such acknowledgment could always be made more prominent; but it appears to have been prominent enough.

More broadly, we should recognize that not all use of another's words requires detailed acknowledgment. Words represent facts; and facts, once revealed, are there to be used, including in novelists' unfootnoted prose.

Mr. Volokh is a professor of law at UCLA School of Law.

Bob Jensen's threads on plagiarism are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/plagiarism.htm

Controversies in Regulation of Distance Education

"All Over the Map," by Elia Powers, Inside Higher Ed, December 8, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/08/regulation

As the distance learning market continues to grow, state agencies charged with regulating the industry continue to operate in a “fragmented environment,” according to a report presented Thursday at the 2006 Education Industry Finance & Investment Summit, in Washington.

One of the main questions these agencies must consider is what constitutes an institution having a “physical presence” in their state. In other words, what is an appropriate test to determine whether regulation is needed?

More than 80 percent of agencies that are included in the report said that they use some sort of “physical presence” test. But few agree on how to define the word “presence,” in part because there are so many elements to consider.

That’s clear in “The State of State Regulation of Cross-Border Postsecondary Education,” the report issued by Dow Lohnes, a firm with a sizable higher education practice. (The firm plans to release an updated report early next year after more responses arrive.)

Continued in article

Bob Jensen's threads on the dark side of education technology are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/theworry.htm

Bob Jensen's threads on cross-border distance education and training alternatives are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/crossborder.htm

Federal Regulators Fine Grant Thornton $300,000 Over Audit of Failed Bank
Federal bank regulators have fined the accounting firm Grant Thornton LLP $300,000 for what they called "reckless conduct" in its audit of First National Bank of Keystone, a West Virginia institution whose collapse in 1999 was one of the costliest U.S. bank failures in the past decade.
Marcy Gordon, "Federal Regulators Fine Grant Thornton $300,000 Over Audit of Failed Bank, SmartPros, December 11, 2006 --- http://accounting.smartpros.com/x55776.xml

Bob Jensen's threads on Grant Thornton (especially the Refco audit failure) are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Fraud001.htm#GrantThornton

The seamy underside of asbestos litigation
In the legal trade, this is known as "double dipping"--the process by which lawyers file claims at many different bankruptcy trusts on behalf of a single plaintiff. Each trust is told a different story about how the client got sick, and the plaintiff collects from all of them. Of course, the lawyers collect too. This practice may well have remained unexposed had not Brayton Purcell decided to cash in on Kananian one more time. It sued Lorillard Tobacco, this time claiming its client had become sick from smoking Kent cigarettes, whose filters contained asbestos for several years in the 1950s. That suit has now exploded on Brayton, exposing one of the asbestos bar's more lucrative cash cows.
Kimberley A. Strassel, "Trusts Busted: The seamy underside of asbestos litigation," The Wall Street Journal, December 5, 2006 --- http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/kstrassel/?id=110009343

Bob Jensen's fraud updates are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudUpdates.htm

Greater Accounting Transparency Sought by the Community College of Philadelphia
A faculty and staff union at the Community College of Philadelphia plans to pose one major question to the institution’s administration at a demonstration scheduled for today: Teachers and students open their books every day — why won’t administrators? The Faculty & Staff Federation of the Community College of Philadelphia, an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, plans to distribute leaflets and circulate a “mobile billboard” around the college’s main campus starting at 9 a.m. today to draw attention to their calls for greater financial transparency on the part of the institution, the latest development in ongoing contract negotiations.Classes will not be interrupted.
Elizabeth Redden, "Open the Books, Professors Plead," Inside Higher Ed, December 8. 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/08/ccp

Bob Jensen's fraud updates are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudUpdates.htm

Forwarded by Debbie Bowling

Major breach of UCLA's computer files
In what appears to be one of the largest computer security breaches ever at an American university, one or more hackers have gained access to a UCLA database containing personal information on about 800,000 of the university's current and former students, faculty and staff members, among others. UCLA officials said the attack on a central campus database exposed records containing the names, Social Security numbers and birth dates — the key elements of identity theft — for at least some of those affected. The attempts to break into the database began in October 2005 and ended Nov. 21, when the suspicious activity was detected and blocked, the officials said.
Rebecca Trounson, "Major breach of UCLA's computer files: Personal information on 800,000 students, alumni and others is exposed; Attacks lasted a year, the school says," LA Times, December 12, 2006 ---
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ucla12dec12,0,7111141.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The University of California at Los Angeles is notifying about 800,000 people that some of their personal information may have been available to a hacker who intruded into parts of the university’s computer network. Those whose identifying information may have been seen include current and former students, professors and other employees, plus applicants and the parents of applicants who applied for financial aid.
Inside Higher Ed, December 13, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/13/qt

Bob Jensen's fraud updates are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudUpdates.htm

Continued Controversies in Assessment of Colleges

"Feeling the Winds From Washington," by Doug Lederman, Inside Higher Ed, December 11, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/11/accredit

The 600 academic administrators and professors who gathered in Philadelphia last week for the annual meeting of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education are on the front lines of the accreditation. They’re the ones who lead self-studies of their own colleges or participate on visiting teams that review other institutions. They are charged with ensuring that their campuses are fulfilling their missions of educating students, and of enticing or prodding occasionally recalcitrant faculty members to measure their effectiveness and change their ways if they come up short.

And to judge by some of the recent rhetoric coming out of Washington, where the accreditation system has become a central focus of the Education Department’s early efforts to carry out the work of the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education, they and the rest of the accreditation system are falling short.

Although the commission abandoned many of the harshest words and radical ideas that had been bandied about during its deliberations — including the possibility of replacing the current system with a “national” (read: federal) framework — its final report still offered a highly critical view of accreditation. Accreditors and higher education officials, the commission concluded, have done far too little to figure out whether college students are coming out of their institutions with the skills they need to be productive workers and citizens.

Accreditors “still focus on process reviews more than bottom-line results for learning or costs,” the report said. “The growing public demand for increased accountability, quality and transparency coupled with the changing structure and globalization of higher education requires a transformation of accreditation.”

How has the criticism of accreditation played with those in the trenches? If participants in the Middle States meeting are any indication, they tend to think the accreditors – or at least their own accreditor – have gotten a bit of a bum rap. Middle States, they say, has for several years been pressuring the institutions it accredits (colleges in Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Puerto Rico) to better define what they want their students to know and be able to do, and to find concrete ways to measure their success.

“This is what the accreditors are trying to achieve already,” said Warren Olip-Ammentorp, a professor of English at Cazenovia College, a small, private college in central New York. “We’ve all been trying to focus on student learning and to use the assessment results to improve that learning, partly because it’s what we’re supposed to do as educators and because we know Middle States is going to hold us accountable on the issue.”

Indeed, virtually every college official interviewed, at private colleges like Cazenovia and at midsize public universities such as Indiana University of Pennsylvania, described efforts – often years in the making – to gauge student outcomes and to use that information to inform curricular and other changes aimed at improving how students fare.

The college officials, almost to a one, also said they worried that the commission’s and the Education Department’s push for colleges to use common indicators that might allow a consumer to more easily compare one against another would, almost inevitably, result in oversimplification. And many of them expressed fears that the department would, as it signaled at meetings of a panel that advises it on accreditation last week, start asking accreditors to set minimum standards for colleges to meet, a role most of them see as inappropriate.

At the same time, they acknowledge flaws in the system. They generally accept the criticism that the accreditation process is too internally focused and that much more disclosure to the public is necessary. And some – particularly at public institutions – believe that colleges with similar missions can work together toward agreement on a menu of common measures that might allow for even more comparisons about their performance.

Perhaps most importantly, despite the lumps, many of them see a bright side to the fact that the feds have taken them to task. “The Spellings commission is having an incredible impact,” said Brent David Ruben, executive director of the Center for Organizational Development and Leadership at Rutgers University. “Sure, some of the criticism has been unfair. But it is prompting review and reflection, which I think is a positive thing.”

Assessment in the Air

It would have been hard for Education Secretary Margaret Spellings or Charles Miller, who headed the Spellings commission, to walk away from last week’s Middle States meeting — dubbed “Navigating the Winds of Change in Higher Education” — thinking that higher education isn’t taking accountability seriously. For the first time, the entire first day of the meeting was set aside for a special track on “effective and innovative assessment,” and it sold out at 300 people. In the conference’s subsequent days, many if not most of the sessions revolved around or at least touched on discussion of the sort of “outcomes measures” that the Spellings commission says accreditors and colleges underemphasize.

At one roundtable discussion, for instance, Cheryl T. Samuels, provost of Indiana University of Pennsylvania, described her institution’s efforts – begun three years ago, in the wake of its Middle States self study – to adopt and hold departments accountable for achieving university-wide student learning outcomes for undergraduate education.

“We’re at the point where we’ve made a decision that we need to do this anyway,” said Samuels. “We know that if we do not take this responsibility ourselves, through accreditation and our own institutions’ work, and move in this direction, it could be forced on us. But we’re fairly confident that we can do this ourselves – we’re the experts.”

She and Rick Ruth, interim provost of Shippensburg University, noted that the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, to which both institutions belong, has long collected and published information from its member universities on more than 60 measures of student and other performance. “We’ve been under that accountability lens for a long time, at least from the system perspective,” said Ruth.

If anyone at the Middle States meeting hadn’t been paying attention to the pressure on higher education accountability out of Washington, the group also heard directly from the Spellings commission itself, in the form of Charlene R. Nunley, the president of Montgomery College, who was among the commission members who helped transform its written report from one focused primarily on accountability and transparency to one that equally emphasizes student access and expanding financial aid.

Nunley acknowledged that some members of the Spellings panel, particularly those representing corporations and the public, “don’t really understand where you are and what you’ve done, and that it’s far ahead of where they think you are.” She noted that despite the early saber rattling about moving to a federal system of accreditation, the commission’s final report did not dictate excessively to higher education. “It did not recommend federalization of accreditation of higher education” and “did not recommend a single standardized test or even a set of tests,” she said.

But that does not, she said, suggest that colleges can afford to do nothing to better measure and report their successes and failures in educating students. “How many of you would say your institutions are doing enough in terms of measuring student learning outcomes?” she asked the college presidents, administrators and professors in the audience. A small scattering of hands, perhaps 25 among the 500 people in the room, went up. “I couldn’t raise my hand either – I admire your honesty,” Nunley said. “When we are honest with ourselves as college leaders, there is not nearly enough happening on our campuses.”

The key going forward, she said, is that “if we in higher education take leadership, we have a chance of making sure that these standards recognize the differences in our institutions,” rather than having oversimplified, inappropriate measures “imposed on us.”

The accreditors and college officials in the audience seemed to appreciate that message. But lest they were inclined to get too comfortable, Jean Avnet Morse, the president of Middle States, followed Nunley’s speech by telling the audience about what she had seen in Washington last week at a meeting of an Education Department advisory panel on accreditation. At that meeting, she said, some of the panel’s members signaled that they wanted accrediting groups not just to require the institutions they oversee to set appropriate goals for student learning, but also to ask: “How do we know that the levels being met are acceptable?”

Morse’s implication, though she stopped short of saying it, was that in carrying out the Spellings commission’s report, the Education Department might be looking to push even harder than the report itself suggested. Lots of head shaking ensued.

Full Disclosure to Consumers of Higher Education (including assessment of colleges and the Spellings Commission Report) --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm#FullDisclosure

Bob Jensen's threads on assessment are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/assess.htm

Bob Jensen's threads on higher education controversies --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm

December 11, 2006 message from Carl Hubbard

Bob:

Did you see the MSNBC story last night of the murder several years ago of the two Dartmouth professors at their secluded country home? It was a sobering story of a thrill killing by two teenage boys. I hope you still have that Rossi 38 Special and that you have it in your back pocket when you answer your door. There is a related story. at Behind the Dartmouth murders - Books - MSNBC.com

Carl

December 11, 2006 reply from Bob Jensen

Hi Carl,

Nobody ever comes to our front door. If it should happen, we have a mounted video camera that takes their pictures before they even start up the steps. Then we tell them to go to the garage where we talk with them over an intercom.

I do remember the Dartmouth case. Fortunately that type of thing is rare in NH. There’s really no way to prevent a totally random happening. An unmarried man who lives down the road is the son of a former FBI Director (Sullivan). He was shot four years ago while walking in the woods. However, that was a hunting accident. Even though we have beautiful woods during hunting season, I generally avoid woods trails during deer and moose season.

I do have 20-40 wild turkeys that come to my front lawn and wait for me to throw out sunflower seeds. Erika says they’re my relatives.

I do have the 38 that you helped me buy. Now if I just had some idea where to look for it.

Have a great holiday!

Bob Jensen

From Jim Mahar's Blog on December 9, 2006 --- http://financeprofessorblog.blogspot.com/

Andrew Metrick: Governance Index Data (Wharton)

I was recently asked where a reader could find the corporate governance index, so I figured others might like to know that it is available through Andrew Metrick's website.

Andrew Metrick: Governance Index Data: "Governance Index Data by Firm, 1990-2006

"For details on the construction of the Governance Index, see Gompers, Paul A., Joy L. Ishii, and Andrew Metrick, 'Corporate Governance and Equity Prices', The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), February 2003, 107-155."

Bob Jensen's threads on corporate governance are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/fraud001.htm#Governance

Question
Who is the highest paid actress in the world?

"Nicole Kidman is the queen of Hollywood when it comes to money. The Oscar winner, who earns as much as $17 million per movie, tops the fifth annual list of highest-paid actresses released Wednesday by The Hollywood Reporter. In second place, with $15 million per movie, was Reese Witherspoon, 30, who won the best-actress Oscar this year for her performance in "Walk the Line." Renee Zellweger, Drew Barrymore and Cameron Diaz placed third, fourth and fifth, respectively. They also get $15 million for each film. Rounding out the top 10 are Halle Berry ($14 million), Charlize Theron ($10 million), Angelina Jolie ($10 million), Kirsten Dunst ($8 million to $10 million) and Jennifer Aniston ($8 million). The list will appear in the Women in Entertainment Power 100 issue to be published by The Hollywood Reporter on Dec. 5. --- http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/29/D8LN2OFG1.html

Should Christian fraternities be allowed on campus?
The University of Georgia on Thursday agreed to recognize a Christian fraternity that sued the institution this week, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported. The university had previously said that the fraternity was violating the university’s anti-bias policy, which protects students from discrimination based on religion, by requiring all members to pledge their belief in Jesus. The university is now considering an exemption for that policy.
Inside Higher Ed, December 8, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/08/qt

"Creating Your Own Photo Book Becomes Easier: Upgrades Help in Turning Digital Images Into Paper; We Test Three Offerings," by Walter S. Mossberg and Katherine Boehret, The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2006; Page D11--- http://online.wsj.com/article/the_mossberg_solution.html

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) has undertaken audit procedures on airlines to review how they are "living up to their 1999 'Customer Service Commitment.'" This document was written when "airlines were under pressure from Congress and consumers for lousy service and long delays" in order to "stave off new legislation regulating their business." The airlines also report little about the frequent flier mile plans they offer, and particularly focus only on the financial aspects of these plans in their annual reports and SEC filings, rather than, say, information about ease of redeeming miles in which customers may be particularly interested.

QUESTIONS:
1.) What information do airlines provide about frequent flier mileage offerings and redemptions in their annual reports and SEC filings?

2.) Why is this information important for financial statement users? In your answer, describe your understanding of the business model and accounting for frequent flier miles, based on the description in the article.

3.) Why did the Department of Transportation (DOT) undertake a review of airline practices? What type of audit would you say that the DOT performed?

4.) What audit procedures did the airlines abandon due to financial exigencies? What was the result of abandoning these audit procedures? In your answer, describe the incentives provided by the act of undertaking audit procedures on operational efficiencies and effectiveness.

How do scholars search for academic references?

Scholarpedia Launches at the end of 2006

Second Nature: PLoS One Picks Up Where Nature Left Off

Scholarly search tools

Top 100 Global Universities

Latest Headlines on November 24, 2006

Latest Headlines on November 28, 2006

Latest Headlines on November 29, 2006

Andrew Metrick: Governance Index Data (Wharton)

* * *

Latest Headlines on December 12, 2006

Latest Headlines on December 13, 2006

Latest Headlines on December 14, 2006

Latest Headlines on December 15, 2006