In the Autumn of Life in the Autumn of 2006 in New Hampshire's White Mountains
From Our Living Room About a Mile from Robert Frost's Old Farm House
Three mountain ranges are visible in the above picture taken in an earlier foliage week:
The Kinsman Range (about 10 miles away showing the pointy-headed Garfield, Baby's Cradle, and Lafayette)
The Twin Mountain Range (about 20 miles away showing North Twin and South Twin)
The distant Presidential Range (about 30 miles away showing part of Mt. Washington with its wind-swept dome in the clouds)
Our closest mountains (Cannon, Three Graces, North Kinsman, and South Kinsman) are to the right and not visible above.
It's been an absolutely breath-taking foliage season this year under a nightly awe-inspiring full moon this week.
We've been blessed!

Tidbits on October 10, 2006
Bob Jensen

Foliage Network --- http://www.foliagenetwork.com/default.php
Foliage in New Hampshire's White Mountains --- http://www.nhliving.com/foliage/index.shtml
Fall Foliage --- http://gonewengland.about.com/cs/fallfoliage/l/blfoliagecentrl.htm
Foliage Pictures --- http://photo.net/travel/us/ne/foliage

For earlier editions of Tidbits go to http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TidbitsDirectory.htm
For earlier editions of New Bookmarks go to http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/bookurl.htm 

Click here to search Bob Jensen's web site if you have key words to enter --- Search Site.
For example if you want to know what Jensen documents have the term "Enron" enter the phrase Jensen AND Enron. Another search engine that covers Trinity and other universities is at http://www.searchedu.com/.


Bob Jensen's past presentations and lectures --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/resume.htm#Presentations   

 

Click here to search this Website if you have key words to enter --- Search Site.
For example if you want to know what Jensen documents have the term "Enron" enter the phrase Jensen AND Enron. Another search engine that covers Trinity and other universities is at http://www.searchedu.com/.

Bob Jensen's Home Page is at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/


Bob Jensen's blogs and various threads on many topics --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/threads.htm
       (Also scroll down to the table at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ )

Zaba Search free database of names, addresses, birth dates, and phone numbers. Social security numbers and background checks are also available for a fee --- http://www.zabasearch.com/




Online Video, Slide Shows, and Audio
In the past I've provided links to various types of music and video available free on the Web. 
I created a page that summarizes those various links --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm

American Heroes (Until We Meet Again) --- http://www.iwo.com/heroes.htm
Poem from fallen soldier honors the brave --- http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=312361&Category=9

All mortal beings, which God brought forth, die the same
Man is not exempt

All will inevitably end as the dust from whence we came
It matters not of age

Do not mourn me if I should fall in a foreign land
Think this of my passing

In a far-off field a finer soil mixed with the foreign sand
A dust that is American

A dust that laughed, cried, and loved as an American
On this plot there shall be

A little piece of America, a patch for the free man
Which no oppressor can take

From this soil grows grass shimmering a little greener
Brilliant emerald ramparts

A Breeze whisping White Poppies with scent a little sweeter
Flowers towards heaven

Mourn not my terrible death but celebrate my cause in life
Viewed noble or not

I would have sacrificed and gave all that I had to give
Not to make man good

But only to let the good man live.

— Aaron Seesan

Bravo America --- http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/video/BravoAmerica.asf

Interactive Dig Black Sea: The Pisa Wreck --- http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/blacksea/index.html

Ocean Symphony with Jack Black (ocean pollution video) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC5P7mBu_XY

NOVA: Mystery of the Megavolcano --- http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/megavolcano/

PanAmAir.org --- http://www.panamair.org/

Professors Sharing Their Lectures on Video
Take Five from the University of Texas http://www.utexas.edu/inside_ut/take5/
Also see http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/updateee.htm#OKI


Free music downloads --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm

Asleep at the Wheel: Driving Western Swing --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6167532

Unearthing an Unexpected Musical Treasure --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6105697

From the Discovered Tapes
* 'Roll on Waters' - Woody Guthrie * 'This Land Is Your Land' - Woody Guthrie

'Rogue's Gallery:' Songs of the Sea --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6105152

For Chico Hamilton, the Beat Goes On --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6112226

New Island Sounds from Cuba's Young Guard --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6126331

Audra McDonald: A 'Theater Geek' Turns to Pop --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6099887

Teoria (interactive music learning tutorials) ---  http://www.teoria.com/

New York Fetes Composer Steve Reich at 70 --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6155645

Live a Life That Matters --- http://susie1114.com/LiveALife.html


Photographs and Art

Foliage Pictures --- http://photo.net/travel/us/ne/foliage

The Nikon Small World Photo Competition (From Time Magazine) --- Click Here  

Amazing Andromeda Galaxy --- http://physorg.com/news79109393.html

Smithsonian Photography Initiative --- http://www.photography.si.edu/

Museums and the Web --- http://conference.archimuse.com/

New Seven Wonders of the World --- http://www.new7wonders.com/index.php?id=17

Digitalmedia Center (photographs from around the world) ---  http://digitalmedia.worldbank.org/

Beautiful Earth (with audio) --- http://home.att.net/%7Ehideaway_fun/442/planet.htm

From the University of Washington
Lawrence Denny Lindsley Photographs --- http://content.lib.washington.edu/llweb/index.html

Barbara Cole's Paintings --- http://www.barbaracole.com/bcIndex.php?com=gallery&cat_id=1&gallery_id=2&num=2

Night aerial photography by Jason Hawkes --- http://news.jasonhawkes.com/

The Art of Madalina Iordache --- http://madyiordache.com/

Spiral Gallery --- http://spiral.gallery.sytes.org/

Tavares Photography --- http://www.cafepress.com/kevintavares/1140633

Richard Branson unveiled the interior of SpaceShipTwo on Thursday at Wired's NextFest --- http://blog.wired.com/branson/

 


Online Books, Poems, References, and Other Literature
In the past I've provided links to various types electronic literature available free on the Web. 
I created a page that summarizes those various links --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm

From the University of South Carolina
Celebrating the Works of F. Scott Ftzgerald --- http://www.sc.edu/fitzgerald/

CELT Corpus of Electronic Texts --- http://www.ucc.ie/celt/publishd.html

Travels With A Donkey In The Cevennes by Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) --- Click Here

Virginibus Puerisque by Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) --- Click Here

Little Women by Louisa May Alcott. --- http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/AlcLitt.html

The Adventure Of The Dancing Men by Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) --- Click Here

The Paris Review: Interviews --- http://www.theparisreview.com/literature.php 

From the Pew Research Center
Looking Backward and Forward, Americans See Less Progress In Their Lives --- http://pewresearch.org/assets/social/pdf/Ladder.pdf

Homer Simpson's Words of Wisdom --- http://funny2.com/homer.htm




Go on, get out! Last words are for fools who haven't said enough!
Karl Marx (1818-1883). Purported to be his last words --- Click Here 

I know you have come to kill me. Shoot, coward. You are only going to kill a man.
Ernesto "Che" Guevara (1928-1967). Purported to be his last words --- Click Here 
Jensen Comment
But only free for a while. The Bolivian Army executed Che without a trial after he was captured by U.S. Special Forces.

Hold the cross high so I may see it through the flames!
Saint Joan of Arc (1412-1431). Purported to be her last words --- Click Here 

Dream and you will be free in spirit, fight and you will be free in life.
Ernesto Che Guevara (1928-1967) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Che_Guevara

Every word has been, at sometime, a neologism.
Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986) --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Luis_Borges

The people we should thank are the innovators and entrepreneurs, the individuals who see new opportunities and risk exploring them -- the people who find new markets, create new products, think out new ways to handle commodities commercially, organize work in new ways, design new technology or transfer capital to more productive uses. The entrepreneur is an explorer, who ventures into uncharted territory and opens up the new routes along which we will all be traveling soon enough. Simply to look around is to understand that entrepreneurs have filled our lives with everyday miracles.
Johan Norberg, "Humanity's Greatest Achievement," The Wall Street Journal, October 2, 2006; Page A11 --- Click Here

The uneven sheds stretch back
Shed behind shed in train
Like cars that have long lain
Dead on a side track
Robert Frost in a newly-discovered World War I poem entitled as quoted by Scott McLeMee in "War Thoughts at Home," Inside Higher Ed, October 4, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/10/04/mclemee

I still find each day too short for all the thoughts I want to think, all the walks I want to take, all the books I want to read, and all the friends I want to see.
John Burroughs as quoted in a recent email message from Paula.




Question
Do Wall Street investment banks favor the GOP with cash donations?
Hint: The answer will probably surprise you.

Wall Street has shifted its allegiance in the 2006 election cycle by donating more to Democrats than Republicans who have been the investment banks' usual benefactors, U.S. Federal Election Commission data show. Five leading firms Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bear Stearns Companies Inc.,Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. have contributed $6.2 million so far to candidates before the November elections, with about 52 percent going to Democrats . . . "People give ideological money and they give money to people they think are going to win," said Maurice Carroll, director of Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute in Hamden, Connecticut. "It looks like it's going to be a good year for Democrats."
Tim McLaughlin, "Wall Street's political cash favors Democrats," Reuters, October 6, 2006 --- http://elections.us.reuters.com/top/news/usnN06393176.html/?src=092906_MARKETING_CMS_ElecMidArt
Jensen Comment
Although the economy is in relatively good shape and tax revenues are pouring into Washington DC and state houses across the land, there is also a general feeling that the GOP-controlled House and Senate blew their chances for major reforms on health care, Medicare, Social Security, and education reforms. Huge worries arise from the GOP failures to control government spending and corruption. There is a high degree of Wall Street resentment toward some legislation, particularly Sarbanes-Oxley costly fraud prevention accounting rules. Doubts have also arisen, long before Bob Woodward's book, about GOP incompetence and corruption, an image that was long "Delayed."  All these things have strengthened the campaigns of Democratic candidates, and Wall Street bets on winners. Change is in the wind (and "wind" is the correct term for candidates from both parties).

House Republicans have done a lousy job of policing themselves
The larger problem for House Republicans is that they've amassed a poor record of policing themselves amid a succession of scandals. Even as Duke Cunningham, Tom DeLay and Bob Ney tarnished the party's image, no one other than a few "moderates" who don't have much sway in the caucus took the lead in called for drumming any of them out of the ranks. It's also notable that none of these three men survived their respective scandals. Cunningham is serving time in the federal pen after pleading guilty to corruption charges late last year. Mr. Ney abandoned plans to run for re-election a few weeks ago after it became clear a federal investigation was heading straight for him.
Brendan Miniter, "The Problem Isn't Foley:  House Republicans have done a lousy job of policing themselves," The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2006 --- http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bminiter/?id=110009031

Sex, lies and power games are just the latest symptoms of a Republican Party that has strayed from its ideals
"The End of a Revolution," by Karen Tumulty, Time Magazine Cover Story, October 8, 2006 --- Click Here

But after controlling both houses of Congress and the White House for most of Bush's six years in office, the party has a governing record that has come unmoored from those Grand Old Party ideals. The exquisite political machinery that aces the elections has begun to betray the platform. To win votes back home, lawmakers have been spending taxpayer money like sailors on leave, producing the biggest budget deficits in U.S. history. And the party's approach to national security has taken the country into a war that most Americans now believe was a mistake and that the government's own intelligence experts say has shaped "a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives."

One of the problems is that after the Republicans got into power, the system began to change them, not just the other way around. Among the first promises the G.O.P. majority broke was the setting of term limits. Their longtime frustrations in the minority didn't necessarily make them any better at reaching across the aisle either. Compromise, that most central of congressional checks and balances, has been largely replaced by a kind of calculated cussedness that has left the G.O.P. isolated and exposed in times of crisis.

Continued in article


Question
Is the GOP manipulating fuel prices for purposes of winning votes?
Answer from the Liberal Left

"Gas Pump Politics," by Nicholas von Hoffman, The Nation, October 3, 2006 --- http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061016/howl

Do the Democrats lose 50,000 votes every time the price of gasoline drops a penny? We'll have the answer to that question in a few weeks, but in the meantime cheaper gasoline raises some interesting questions.

The first of which is whether or not the Republicans have arranged to lower them to prevent what had seemed to be defeat in November. Certainly, the timing of the price drop might cause even the credulous to entertain a suspicion or two.

You may be sure that the Republicans are delighted to see gasoline fade from the list of voter irritations. You may also be sure that the Republicans would have arranged for prices at the pump to swoon if they could, but can they?

Not likely. To make the price of gasoline come down in Ohio, where the GOP is in big trouble, the prices have to drop everywhere. No special walled-off Ohio oil market, or even an American oil market, exists. If the price of oil is going to go down in Cincinnati, it is going to have to go down in Shanghai. Oil, as the economists say, is fungible.

There are times when energy prices are manipulated, California's electricity cost being an example. A few years ago, by closing certain generating plants and refusing to sell electricity from certain other plants, an artificial shortage was created, which drove up the price of electricity and drove ordinary Californians to the poorhouse.

But California is not part of a world electricity market. As opposed to oil prices, those electricity prices could be forced upward without worrying about how would-be suppliers in Canada or elsewhere would react. If California had been part of a world market, when the prices went up outside suppliers of electricity would have rushed in to sell and the prices would have been forced down again.

Because oil must be refined, it is possible to play some games with gasoline prices. Refineries can be pulled off line for no good reason except to drive the price of the products up. The operative word here is "up."

Driving prices down is another matter. Manipulators make money when the price goes up. Manipulators do not make money when the price goes down.

Down is going to cost somebody a lot of money. For practical purposes, the only way to make prices go down is to sell gasoline at a loss because you must sell it under the going price. Not quite the same as giving it away, but it's close.

And you have to sell a lot of it under the going rate. Last winter, for example, we saw President Bush's good friend the devil-defying Hugo Chávez, sell heating oil to poor Americans at lower-than-market prices, and guess what effect that had on the price of heating oil generally? None.

Last winter Chávez, through Citgo, owned by Venezuela, dumped 16 million gallons of heating oil at below-market prices in eight states, and if it pushed down the price of heating, nobody could see it. Imagine how many million barrels of oil it would take to depress the entire gasoline market--and how much it would cost. Rich Republicans, who are desperately clinging to every nickel out of fear the death tax will pauperize their heirs, are not about to make a campaign contribution of this magnitude. If that's the cost--and it would be--of keeping Denny Hastert in the House Speaker's chair, they'll take their chances with Nancy Pelosi.

The Democrats, posing as the champions of the great unwashed as they do, dare not show their apprehension at the slump in gas prices even as they watch votes melt away. Nevertheless, every time gas prices drop, people kid themselves into believing the oil is going to flow forever and that we can go on living as we have forever.

If the past is any kind of a guide, the numbskulls in Detroit will postpone the design and production of truly energy-efficient automobiles, a decision that will ultimately put them out of business. Lower prices will bring research and development on more expensive alternatives to a halt. The thousands of undertakings, great and small, that can increase efficiency will be put off yet longer.

There will be no politicians of note who command national attention (Al Gore aside) to tell us that we are once more frittering away precious lead time between now and when (a) the oil runs out and (b) the environment crashes.

The American religion of every man for himself and the devil take the hindmost has made it a point of pride never to plan ahead, never to be ready and never to prepare. So in war after war we are caught with our pants down and in peace each Katrina is worse than the last one.

Whatever danger, no matter how real, how close or how certain, the response is, "Oh, the free market will take care of it" or "Aw, don't worry, technology has our back covered." So instead of throwing ourselves into energy conservation to postpone the day of disaster, we hear speeches about energy independence and ethanol.

As of now all ethanol can do is win the Midwestern farm vote. Yet the Democrats ought not to give up hope. The Republicans seem to have an inexhaustible supply of crooked pederast Congressmen, and there is one deep truth, which is that oil prices, like all prices, fluctuate. Next time the Ds may catch 'em on the down cycle.

"Why Are Saudis Approving Cheaper Oil? Short term, the kingdom fears economic disruption from price spikes. Long term, though, it seeks to manage the market with boosted capacity," by Stanley Reed, Business Week, October 4, 2006 ---
Click Here

Unbelievable as it may sound, Saudi Arabia is practically applauding the 22% plunge in global oil prices since July. On Sept. 19, Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi called a price of about $60 per barrel "reasonable." Analysts think the Saudis could even live with a price in the mid-$50's per barrel. "The Saudi price target is probably lower than the rest of OPEC; they are still happy at $50 per barrel," says David Kirsch, an analyst at PFC Energy in Washington.

Why would the kingdom, which boasts the world's largest oil reserves, cheer a price slump? In fact, the Saudis never felt comfortable with $70 oil, fearing that sky-high prices might kill off the global appetite for their single source of wealth.

"There is concern that the volatility in the markets is so beyond anyone's control that it could cause severe damage to the world economy," says Sadad Al Husseini, the retired exploration and production chief of Saudi Aramco, the national oil company. The Saudis, he says, "are determined to try and manage better."

INVESTING IN CAPACITY.
That's not to say the Saudis want to see prices continue to drop. In the short term, they're trying to keep them from crashing below $50 per barrel by gradually withdrawing oil from the market. But they're also investing tens of billions of dollars to build spare capacity.

At a mid-September OPEC meeting in Vienna, Oil Minister Naimi said Saudi Arabia plans to expand production in seven fields to add 2.4 million barrels per day of capacity, boosting its total to about 12.5 million barrels per day by 2009. On Oct. 1, the Saudis announced they would start work in early 2007 on a new oilfield called Moneefa, which will have 900,000 barrels of capacity and come on line in 2011.

The Saudis want to be able to pump more so they can manage prices by adding supply when markets are tight, and removing it when inventories fatten. Of the major OPEC producers, only the Saudis currently have significant spare capacity. But by 2004 they had allowed their buffer to dwindle to around 700,000 barrels per day, not enough to cover a major outage such as a shutdown of Iranian production. Like the rest of the industry, they were caught napping by the big surge in demand beginning in 2004, which triggered a doubling of prices over the following two years.

DECOUPLING OIL FROM POLITICS.
The new production won't come cheap. The cost of expanding production will exceed $24 billion, figures Nawaf Obaid, managing director of the Saudi National Security Project, a Riyadh consultancy. He says the Saudi leadership under King Abdullah wants to "decouple energy and foreign policy" by building up enough spare capacity to offset a cutoff of crude from Iran as well as another major producer such as Venezuela or Nigeria. They also want to tamp down criticism from U.S. politicians.

For now, Venezuela and Nigeria say they are cooperating with Saudi Arabia’s short-term goal. Oil ministers from the two nations in late September promised to cut production by 170,000 barrels per day, which should help the Saudis steady prices without reducing their own 30% share of OPEC production. But some market watchers think the Saudis will eventually have to shoulder nearly all of the cuts of 1 million barrels per day or more that may be required to keep oil above $50 per barrel.

"We have seen the peak [in prices] for a while unless something blows up," says Leo Drollas, an analyst at the Center for Global Energy Studies in London. Even so, the Saudis want an insurance policy of extra capacity in case prices spike again.


From Columbia University
Having wreaked havoc onstage, the students unrolled a banner that read, in both Arabic and English, "No one is ever illegal."

"At Columbia, Students Attack Minuteman Founder," by Eliana Johnson, The New York Sun, October 4, 2006 --- http://www.nysun.com/article/40983

Students stormed the stage at Columbia University's Roone auditorium yesterday, knocking over chairs and tables and attacking Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minutemen, a group that patrols the border between America and Mexico.

Mr. Gilchrist and Marvin Stewart, another member of his group, were in the process of giving a speech at the invitation of the Columbia College Republicans. They were escorted off the stage unharmed and exited the auditorium by a back door.

Having wreaked havoc onstage, the students unrolled a banner that read, in both Arabic and English, "No one is ever illegal." As security guards closed the curtains and began escorting people from the auditorium, the students jumped from the stage, pumping their fists, chanting victoriously, "Si se pudo, si se pudo," Spanish for "Yes we could!"

The Minuteman Project, an organization of volunteers founded in 2004 by Mr. Gilchrist, aims to keep illegal immigrants out of America by alerting law enforcement officials when they attempt to cross the border. The group uses fiery language and unorthodox tactics to advance its platform. "Future generations will inherit a tangle of rancorous, unassimilated, squabbling cultures with no common bond to hold them together, and a certain guarantee of the death of this nation as a harmonious ‘melting pot,'" the group's Web site warns.

The pandemonium that ensued as the evening's keynote speaker took the stage was merely the climax of protest that brewed all week. A number of campus groups, including the Chicano caucus, the African-American student organization, and the International Socialist organization, began planning their protests early this week when they heard that the Minutemen would be arriving on campus.

The student protesters, who attended the event clad in white as a sign of dissent, booed and shouted the speakers down throughout. They interrupted Mr. Stewart, who is African-American, when he referred to the Declaration of Independence's self-evident truth that "All men are created equal," calling him a racist, a sellout, and a black white supremacist.

A student's demand that Mr. Stewart speak in Spanish elicited thundering applause and brought the protesters to their feet. The protesters remained standing, turned their backs on Mr. Stewart for the remainder of his remarks, and drowned him out by chanting, "Wrap it up, wrap it up!" Mr. Stewart appeared unfazed by their behavior. He simply smiled and bellowed, "No wonder you don't know what you're talking about."

"These are racist individuals heading a project that terrorizes immigrants on the U.S.-Mexican border," Ryan Fukumori, a Columbia junior who took part in the protest, told The New York Sun. "They have no right to be able to speak here."

The student protesters "rush to vindicate themselves with monikers like ‘liberal' and ‘open-minded,' but their actions, their attempt to condemn the Minutemen without even hearing what they have to say, speak otherwise," the president of the Columbia College Republicans, Chris Kulawik, said. On campus, the Republicans' flyers advertising the event were defaced and torn down.

The College Republicans expressed their concern about the lack of free speech for opposing viewpoints on the Columbia campus in the wake of the evening's events. "We've often feared that there's not freedom of speech at Columbia for more right-wing views — and that was proven tonight," the executive director of the Columbia College Republicans, Lauren Steinberg, said.

The Minutemen's arrival at Columbia drew protesters from around the city as well. An hour before Messrs. Stewart and Mr. Gilchrist took the stage, rowdy protests began outside the auditorium on Broadway, where activists chanted, "Hey, hey, ho, ho, the Minutemen have got to go!"

Continued in article

Mr. Bollinger (President of Columbia University), a legal scholar whose specialty is free speech and the First Amendment, quickly condemned this week’s disruption. “Students and faculty have rights to invite speakers to the campus,” he said yesterday in an interview. “Others have rights to hear them. Those who wish to protest have rights to do so. No one, however, shall have the right or the power to use the cover of protest to silence speakers.” He added, “There is a vast difference between reasonable protest that allows a speaker to continue, and protest that makes it impossible for speech to continue.”
Karen W. Arenson and Damien Cave, "Silencing of a Speech Causes a Furor," The New York Times, October 7, 2006 --- http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/07/nyregion/07columbia.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

With Columbia University again under fire over speech issues, the president is condemning anyone who prevents another’s speech from taking place. On Wednesday, protesters stormed a stage where Jim Gilchrist, head of the Minuteman Project, a “vigilance operation” opposing illegal immigration, was speaking, forcing him to stop his talk. Lee C. Bollinger, Columbia’s president, pledged that the university would investigate the incident and procedures for making sure that speakers can give their talks. In a statement, he said: “This is not a complicated issue. Students and faculty have rights to invite speakers to the campus. Others have rights to hear them. Those who wish to protest have rights to do so. No one, however, shall have the right or the power to use the cover of protest to silence speakers. This is a sacrosanct and inviolable principle.”
Inside Higher Ed, October 9, 2006


  • Frightened Into Ignorance
    Iraq's school and university system is in danger of collapse in large areas of the country as pupils and teachers take flight in the face of threats of violence. Professors and parents have told the Guardian they no longer feel safe to attend their educational institutions. In some schools and colleges, up to half the staff have fled abroad, resigned or applied to go on prolonged vacation, and class sizes have also dropped by up to half in the areas that are the worst affected.
    "Iraqi education system on brink of collapse." Peter Beaumont, The Guardian, October 4, 2006 --- http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1887450,00.html


     If the George Bush has this supernatural power, the whole world should be scared
    THE followers of Moqtada al-Sadr believe that the US invaded Iraq to prevent the return to Earth of their sect’s messiah-like figure, the Mahdi, or 12th imam. Hojatoleslam al-Sadr claims that his militia is preparing for the day when the Mahdi, the last direct descendent of the revered Shia figure Ali, reappears. Shia believe that the Mahdi, who disappeared in 868, will bring justice to Earth.

    "Waiting for the imam's return to Earth," London Times, October 3, 2006 --- Click Here


    "Why Are There Wars Without End?" PhysOrg, October 6, 2006 --- http://physorg.com/news79366691.html


    "Paz to supply gas to Palestinian Authority:  Israeli energy company to refine oil for Authority it in it's recently purchased Oil Refineries in Ashdod. Deal estimates to worth about NIA 1.5 billion (roughly USD 30 million)," by Tani Goldstein, Ynet, October 5, 2006 --- http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3311320,00.html

    The Paz energy company began supplying gas to the Palestinian Authority Wednesday, after signing an agreement with the PA to start providing it with petrol in three months.

    Sources in the Israeli energy industry and the PA claim that contract went into effect immediately after the Alon Oil Company, the PA's previous supplier, stopped providing the Palestinians with gas on Tuesday.

    Paz acquired the Ashdod Oil Refineries from the government this week for a sum of NIS 3.25 billion (roughly USD 764 million).

    According to the deal signed between the PA and Paz, the energy company will refine crude oil for the Palestinians, who will purchase the oil directly from the Arab countries. This is set to be the first time since its establishment in 1994 that the PA buys oil independently, and not from Israel.

    It is estimated that Paz will sell the petrol to the Palestinians for a lower price than will be charged in Israel.

    According to estimates in the energy industry, official purchase of oil in the PA amount to NIS 1.5 billion (roughly USD 30 million) per year.


    The North Korean Motives are Obvious
    Kim Jong-il’s methods have paid off handsomely. Each act of brinksmanship has brought cash, supplies, oil, nuclear reactors, or additional concessions from the West. Within two months of the Taepo Dong missile scraping across Nippon in August 1998, President Clinton sent North Korea a multi-million dollar aid package and reopened bilateral negotiations.
    Ben Johnson, "The Left's Diplomacy Pays Off," FrontPage Magazine, October 9, 2006 --- http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=24826

    "Pyongyang Phooey," by Nicholas Eberstadt, The Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2006; Page A20 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116001318634783308.html?mod=opinion&ojcontent=otep

    North Korea has been called a "rogue state" by some, a "terrorist state" by others, and fair enough -- but while those terms carry opprobrium, they lack real descriptive content. The North is better understood as a "revisionist state" -- bitterly dissatisfied with the international environment it faces, and intent upon overturning that order. Its main grievances with the international system are: (1) the predominance and success of the capitalist world economy, particularly its global trade and financial arrangements, which are fundamentally incompatible with Pyongyang's Stalin-style economy; (2) the Northeast Asian security structure of military alliances built and maintained by its superpower enemy, the U.S.; and (3) the florescence of a prosperous, democratic South Korean state on the landmass that the Kim family claims the right to rule unconditionally.

    These grievances are not merely aesthetic. Since each of these features of the international system places the survival of their own system in jeopardy, North Korea is exceedingly unlikely to be reconciled to them through "international dialogue." Making the world safe for Kim Jong Il requires nothing less than upending the contemporary economic, political and military order in Northeast Asia -- preposterous as such an outcome may sound to South Korean, Japanese or American ears.

    Nevertheless, North Korean policy is relentlessly focused on achieving just such an upending. The carefully chosen tools for the job are nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles. The point of vulnerability -- the focus of these WMD -- is the U.S.-South Korea military alliance. By training missiles on U.S. territory, Pyongyang's goal of breaking the alliance would be promoted most efficiently -- and its objective of unconditional unification with South Korea would be directly advanced. Why? Because placing U.S. territory in North Korea's nuclear crosshairs inescapably undermines the credibility of American security guarantees in a time of crisis on the Korean peninsula. If U.S. policy makers were deemed unwilling to expose Seattle in order to honor commitments to Seoul, the security alliance would be worthless, America's unparalleled military might notwithstanding.

    For over half a century, Pyongyang has endured the reality of U.S.-imposed "deterrence." For Kim Jong Il, the geopolitical keys to the kingdom lie in deterring the deterrer -- and North Korea's otherwise puzzling and bellicose behavior should be regarded through the prism of this long-term project.

    The seemingly stalled six-party talks, for example, are actually not stalled at all: North Korea's missile and nuclear weapons programs have apparently been progressing quite nicely during the three-plus years of conferencing. There is an eerie similarity between the "conference diplomacy" involving North Korea today and earlier episodes of "conference diplomacy" in Europe between World Wars I and II. While the particulars are obviously different -- Germany was the strongest state in its region, while North Korea is the weakest -- the dynamics are almost exactly the same: The status quo powers want to talk; the revisionist powers want to arm -- and both parties get their wish.

    When North Korea launched its missiles in July, the move was judged in many quarters to be impetuous, even irrational. In fact, it was coolly calculated, displaying the regime's confidence that it could manage subsequent international events while pushing its game up to a potentially much more dangerous level.

    Even so, Pyongyang could not have known how much its own project -- inflaming the U.S.-South Korea military alliance -- would be abetted by the hapless Roh Moo Hyun government. In the immediate aftermath of the launches, South Korea's President Roh studiously avoided criticism of North Korea -- and instead harshly scolded the Japanese for (among other things) bringing the matter before the U.N., averring that Tokyo's actions could "lead to a critical situation in the peace over Northeast Asia"! The Roh administration also stated that its multibillion dollar joint-venture scheme within North Korea, the Kaesong Industrial Complex, should be insulated against any political fallout from the missile episode. It continued the subsidies for the project and insisted that North Korean products "made in Kaesong" should receive privileged treatment in the pending U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement.

    Most portentously of all, Mr. Roh fixated on switching wartime operational control (Opcon) of the U.S-South Korea combined forces command from U.S. to South Korean hands. It seemed to matter little to him that many military specialists in South Korea itself -- including a large number of retired generals and former ministers of national defense -- went on record to warn that the South's forces were not prepared for such a transition, and that readiness might suffer. The true reasoning behind Mr. Roh's adamant Opcon lobbying may have been revealed by one of his advisers at a public seminar in Seoul last month. He argued that South Korea's control of troops during wartime is critical to maintain security on the peninsula as it prevents the U.S. military from unilaterally conducting military operations in the case of an emergency on the peninsula.

    Opcon, in other words, was a proxy for the Roh government's distrust of its U.S. ally -- a feeling evidently so powerful that it could not be restrained even under the pressure of North Korea's missile tests. In the light of such official South Korean reactions, Pyongyang made its own calculations about the risks and benefits in moving its agenda on to nuclear tests. * * *

    If the flower children in charge of South Korean national security policy these days have acquitted themselves poorly, the record of the self-proclaimed grownups who took charge of Washington's policies in 2001 does not look that much better. Passive-aggressive in the face of North Korean brinkmanship, irritable and reactive in the face of mounting frictions in the relationship with Seoul, the Bush administration's main achievement to date in "alliance management" seems to have been the drawdown of U.S. forces in South Korea, with more in store. It is not even clear that our statesmen understand the stakes of the game they are embroiled in. All this, of course, will hardly dissuade Pyongyang from pressing the U.S.-South Korea alliance ever harder.

    With his latest nuclear gambit, Kim Jong Il has just reset the clock on the U.S.-South Korean military alliance, moving the hands palpably closer to midnight. If we listen closely, we can hear the ticking.

    Mr. Eberstadt, the Henry Wendt scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, is author of "The North Korean Economy Between Crisis and Catastrophe," forthcoming from Transaction Publishers.


    Question
    Do professors who expound political beliefs to their students affect political beliefs of their students?

    "All in the Family," by Arthur C. Brooks, The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2006; Page A26 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115984030264280759.html?mod=todays_us_opinion

    Parents have just sent their kids off to college, full of hope that the knowledge and enlightenment they acquire will prepare them for the rigors of the modern economy. But a worrying possibility is keeping some of these parents -- especially the conservative ones -- up at night: the prospect that their children will be hopelessly corrupted by the faculty.

    In one popular book about campus politics, the author writes, "We all know that left-wing radicals from the 1960s have hung around academia and hired people like themselves. . . . [T]hey spew violent anti-Americanism, preach anti-Semitism, and cheer on the killing of American soldiers and civilians -- all the while collecting tax dollars and tuition fees to indoctrinate our children." If the author is right, then the fears about the minds of our children might seem like a lot more than just right-wing paranoia.

    Most studies of the subject have indicated that, indeed, upward of 90% of college professors at many universities hold liberal political views. In some schools and departments, faculties are virtually 100% left-wing. It is one thing to lament this ideological lopsidedness in the academy. But it is quite another to assume that professors actually bend the little minds in their care toward a liberal point of view, or even a radical one. Imagine a student with God-fearing Republican parents exposed to the depredations of an English professor aiming to use his class as a Bolshevik training camp. Will the professor succeed in turning the kid into a Red? The evidence says, probably not: When it comes to politics, people from conservative families follow their parents, not their professors.

    The most recent evidence on this subject comes from the mid-1990s, in the University of Michigan's National Election Studies. These survey data uncover two facts. First, people who go to college are more likely to vote Republican than those who don't go to college. Adults 25 and under from Republican homes are, for example, 11 percentage points more likely to vote Republican if they attended college than if they didn't. And young adults from Democratic households are 11 percentage points less likely to vote Democrat if they've gone to college than if not.

    Second, nearly everybody grows more likely to vote Republican as they age -- but especially college graduates. It is no shock that the vast majority of people of all educational backgrounds from Republican homes vote Republican by age 40. It may come as more of a surprise that 40-year-olds with Democrat parents are far less likely to vote Democrat if they've gone to college than if they haven't. In fact, while three-quarters of the uneducated group still vote Democrat, the odds are only about 50-50 that the college graduates vote this way. And they've not all become skeptical political independents: Fully a third are registered Republicans.

    Obviously, some kids turn left in college -- but this appears to be the exception, not the rule. Does all this mean that our colleges and universities are actually breeding grounds for conservatism? Hardly. What the statistics really show is that higher education by itself doesn't affect political views very much. Rather, in addition to the strong influence of parents, it is higher incomes -- which typically reward a college education in America -- that push people to the right politically. In Republican families, the income effect reinforces parents' influence on their kids. In Democratic families, the two effects work against each other.

    To fearful Republican parents, then: Sleep tight. When it comes to politics, your kids are in good hands -- yours.

    Professor Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Public Affairs, is the author of "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism," forthcoming in November from Basic Books.


    "No Return To IRA Terror," Sky News, October 4, 2006 ---
    http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13545616,00.html

    The IRA no longer considers a return to terrorism "a viable option", according to Northern Ireland's ceasefire watchdog.

    The conclusion of the Independent Monitoring Commission comes in its 12th report on the peace process in the province.

    It says the IRA has disbanded its military structures and is no longer involved in "terrorism, training, recruiting, targeting, procurement or engineering".

    The Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain welcomed the conclusions of the IMC.

    "There is now convincing evidence of the IRA's continuing commitment to the political path and ... it is no longer credible to suggest otherwise," he said.

    The Irish PM Bertie Ahern called the findings "positive and clear-cut", adding they were "of the utmost importance and significance".

    Continued in article

    "Blair: Northern Ireland final settlement within reach," by Matt Weaver, The Guardian, October 4, 2006 --- http://www.guardian.co.uk/Northern_Ireland/Story/0,,1887436,00.html


    Senate Voting on Two Bills to Fence Off U.S.-Mexico Border

    Jensen Comment
    An iron curtain between Mexico and the U.S. may keep out some migrant workers, but it gives me very little feeling of safety from terrorists who will easily enter the U.S. with a bit of imagination and money. The easy passage of this bill is heavily based upon voter sentiment against a rising tide of illegal immigration across the southern border of the U.S.

    Senator Chafee is the only Republican voting against the fence on the second bill. Given business lobbying against the fence, it's surprising that all other Republicans did not follow Chafee's lead. Many businesses opposed to fencing want the added, and generally inexpensive, labor supply.

    The Democratic leadership split markedly on these bills with Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Tom Harkin, Chuck Schumer, and Ron Wyden voting Yea for both fencing bills versus Senators Durbin, Feingold, Lieberman, and Sarbanes voting Nay both times. A few other leading Democrats joined in the Nay vote on the second bill. Labor union lobbying for the fence probably accounts for much of this split among Democrats. Noted switchers between the first and second fencing bills are highlighted below. Senator Kennedy abstained on the second vote, but his press releases are negative regarding fence building.

    Here's How Our U.S. Senators Voted on Both Fencing Bills:  http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00126
    http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00262

    Senator Name With the May 17, 2006 Vote Followed by the September 29, 2006 Vote
    Kennedy (D-MA), Nay then Abstain

    Chafee (R-RI),
    Yea then Nay
    Kerry (D-MA), Yea then Nay
    Leahy (D-VT), Yea then Nay
    Levin (D-MI),
    Yea then Nay
    Reid (D-NV), Yea then Nay
    Salazar (D-CO), Yea then Nay

    Akaka (D-HI), Nay
    on both
    Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
    on both
    Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
    on both
    Durbin (D-IL), Nay
    on both
    Feingold (D-WI), Nay
    on both
    Inouye (D-HI), Nay
    on both
    Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
    on both
    Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
    on both
    Lieberman (D-CT), Nay on both
    Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
    on both
    Murray (D-WA), Nay
    on both
    Reed (D-RI), Nay
    on both
    Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
    on both

    Dodd (D-CT), Nay then Yea
    Obama (D-IL), Nay then Yea
    Rockefeller (D-WV), Abstain then Yea


     


    Alexander (R-TN), Yea on both
    Allard (R-CO), Yea on both
    Allen (R-VA), Yea on both
    Baucus (D-MT), Yea on both
    Bayh (D-IN), Yea on both
    Bennett (R-UT), Yea on both
    Biden (D-DE), Yea on both
    Bond (R-MO), Yea on both
    Boxer (D-CA), Yea on both
    Brownback (R-KS), Yea on both
    Bunning (R-KY), Yea on both
    Burns (R-MT), Yea on both
    Burr (R-NC), Yea on both
    Byrd (D-WV), Yea on both
    Carper (D-DE), Yea on both
    Chambliss (R-GA), Yea on both
    Clinton (D-NY), Yea on both
    Coburn (R-OK), Yea on both
    Cochran (R-MS), Yea on both
    Coleman (R-MN), Yea on both
    Collins (R-ME), Yea on both
    Conrad (D-ND), Yea on both
    Cornyn (R-TX), Yea on both
    Craig (R-ID), Yea on both
    Crapo (R-ID), Yea on both
    Dayton (D-MN), Yea on both
    DeMint (R-SC), Yea on both
    DeWine (R-OH), Yea on both
    Dole (R-NC), Yea on both
    Domenici (R-NM), Yea on both
    Dorgan (D-ND), Yea on both
    Ensign (R-NV), Yea on both
    Enzi (R-WY), Yea on both
    Feinstein (D-CA), Yea on both
    Frist (R-TN), Yea on both
    Graham (R-SC), Yea on both
    Grassley (R-IA), Yea on both
    Gregg (R-NH), Yea on both

    Hagel (R-NE), Yea on both
    Harkin (D-IA), Yea on both
    Hatch (R-UT), Yea on both
    Hutchison (R-TX), Yea on both
    Inhofe (R-OK), Yea on both
    Isakson (R-GA), Yea
    Johnson (D-SD), Yea on both
    Kohl (D-WI), Yea on both
    Kyl (R-AZ), Yea on both
    Landrieu (D-LA), Yea on both
    Lincoln (D-AR), Yea on both
    Lott (R-MS), Yea on both
    Lugar (R-IN), Yea on both
    Martinez (R-FL), Yea on both
    McCain (R-AZ), Yea on both
    McConnell (R-KY), Yea on both
    Mikulski (D-MD), Yea on both
    Murkowski (R-AK), Yea on both
    Nelson (D-FL), Yea on both
    Nelson (D-NE), Yea on both
    Pryor (D-AR), Yea on both
    Roberts (R-KS), Yea on both
    Santorum (R-PA), Yea on both
    Schumer (D-NY), Yea on both
    Sessions (R-AL), Yea on both
    Shelby (R-AL), Yea on both
    Smith (R-OR), Yea on both
    Snowe (R-ME), Yea on both
    Specter (R-PA), Yea on both
    Stabenow (D-MI), Yea on both
    Stevens (R-AK), Yea on both
    Sununu (R-NH), Yea on both
    Talent (R-MO), Yea on both
    Thomas (R-WY), Yea on both
    Thune (R-SD), Yea on both
    Vitter (R-LA), Yea on both
    Voinovich (R-OH), Yea on both
    Warner (R-VA), Yea on both
    Wyden (D-OR), Yea on both

     

    Question
    Can we fence off the Pacific Ocean?

    "SEX TRAFFICKING:  San Francisco Is A Major Center For International Crime Networks That Smuggle And Enslave," San Francisco Chronicle, October 6, 2006 --- Click Here

    Many of San Francisco's Asian massage parlors -- long an established part of the city's sexually permissive culture -- have degenerated into something much more sinister: international sex slave shops.

    Once limited to infamous locales such as Bombay and Bangkok, sex trafficking is now an $8 billion international business, with San Francisco among its largest commercial centers.

    San Francisco's liberal attitude toward sex, the city's history of arresting prostitutes instead of pimps, and its large immigrant population have made it one of the top American cities for international sex traffickers to do business undetected, according to Donna Hughes, a national expert on sex trafficking at the University of Rhode Island.

    "It makes me sick to my stomach," said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. "Girls are being forced to come to this country, their families back home are threatened, and they are being raped repeatedly, over and over."

    Because sex trafficking is so far underground, the number of victims in the United States and worldwide is not known, and the statistics vary wildly.

    The most often cited numbers come from the U.S. State Department, which estimates that 600,000 to 800,000 people are trafficked for forced labor and sex worldwide each year -- and that 80 percent are women and girls. Most trafficked females, the department says, are exploited in commercial sex outlets.

    Relying on research from the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department estimates there are 14,500 to 17,500 human trafficking victims brought into the United States each year -- but does not quantify how many of those are sex victims. Some advocacy groups place the number of U.S. victims much higher, while others criticize the government for overstating the problem.

    "The number will always be an estimate, because trafficking victims don't stand in line and raise their hands to be counted, but it's the best estimate we have," said Ambassador John Miller, director of the State Department's Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons. The CIA won't divulge its research methods, but based its figures on 1,500 sources, including law enforcement data, government data, academic research, international reports and newspaper stories.

    Women trafficked for the sex industry are predominantly from Southeast Asia, the former Soviet Union and South America -- lured to the United States by promises of lucrative jobs as models or hostesses, only to be sold to brothels, strip clubs and outcall services and extorted into working off thousands of dollars in surprise travel debts to their new "owners."

    Federal investigators say that even those who come to the United States with the idea of working as high-society call girls cannot imagine the captivity and the degrading workload they face.

    "Human trafficking is a multibillion-dollar business. In terms of profits, it's on a path to overtake drug and arms trafficking," said Barry Tang, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement attache with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in South Korea. "There's a highly organized logistical network between Korea and the United States with recruiters, brokers, intermediaries, taxi drivers and madams."

    The United States is among the top three destination countries for sex traffickers, along with Japan and Australia. Once in the United States, traffickers most often set up shop in California, New York, Texas and Las Vegas.

    It's an underground world, but in more than 100 interviews with federal agents, experts and sex trafficking victims in California and South Korea, a picture emerges about how international traffickers buy and sell women between Asia and the West Coast.

    Overseas, the trafficker is usually a woman. She recruits from clubs, bars, colleges, pool halls and restaurants, said Deputy Special Agent Mark F. Wollman, who oversees San Francisco for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Recruiters fill the want ads in papers and the Internet, targeting vulnerable young women with fake job offers for waitresses, models and hostesses in America.

    Traffickers fly the women to Canada or Mexico, and walk or drive them into California. In Canada, they slip through Indian reservations off-limits to the U.S. Border Patrol, often at night, and sometimes along snow-packed trails.

    In Mexico, the traffickers lead the women over the same treacherous desert paths worn down by migrants heading to "El Norte" for work. More women come through airport customs in San Francisco and Los Angeles, using fake passports and student or tourist visas made for them by their traffickers.

    It's relatively easy for traffickers to evade authorities at the checkpoints -- land, air or sea -- because women still don't realize at that point that they are being tricked.

    "It's not like the movies where you open a trunk and you interview them and they tell you everything," said Lauren Mack, special-agent-in-charge with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in San Diego. "They aren't going to tell you they're victimized because they aren't -- yet."

    Once in California, the women are taken most often to Los Angeles or San Francisco, where they are hidden inside homes, massage parlors, apartments and basements, only to learn that the job offer was just a ploy. Typically they are locked inside their place of business, forced to have sex with as many as a dozen men a day. Sometimes victims are forced to live in the brothel, too, where five or six "co-workers" are crammed into one room.

    Their "owners" confiscate their travel documents until the women pay off exorbitant sums. Often captors will ensure the women never pay off their debts, by tacking on fees for food, clothing or rent. Some fine the women for displeasing customers, being late to work, fighting or a host of other possible transgressions.

    Yuki, 25, who fears for her safety and only gave her first name to The Chronicle during an interview in Seoul, said she was trafficked from South Korea to a karaoke bar in Inglewood (Los Angeles County), where she was assured that she would simply be serving drinks to men. Once there, she was ordered to sell $3,000 worth of drinks each month. When she failed, she was sent to the "touching room," a private suite where men could have their way with her for $400.

    Sex slaves who work in massage parlors and bars are often locked in their place of business by double security doors, monitored by surveillance cameras and only let outside under the guard of crooked taxi drivers who ferry them to their next sex appointment.

    Women report being beaten, raped and starved by their keepers. Kim, who also withheld her last name, told The Chronicle in an interview in South Korea that she was forced to pay $4,400 for plastic surgery to open her eyes and make her nose thinner and pointier, "like Marilyn Monroe."

    Both women eventually escaped their captors and now live as shut-ins in Seoul, spending their time on the phone or the Internet or watching TV, too afraid to go outside and cross paths with someone from the network that trafficked them.

    They are scared because sex trafficking rings are often run by criminal organizations that aren't afraid to use violence to protect the billions they generate.

    Although it's not known how much money the San Francisco market generates for sex traffickers, federal agents confiscated $2 million in cash from 10 Asian massage parlors during a San Francisco raid in summer 2005.

    Local police say the bust didn't make a dent in the illegal sex trade.

    Continued in article


    The president and co-owner of a Wilmington-based temporary labor service company pleaded guilty in federal court Tuesday to conspiring to provide work for hundreds of illegal aliens. Maximino Garcia, president of Garcia Labor Co. in Ohio Inc. and Tennessee-based Garcia Labor Co. Inc., entered a plea agreement that requires him to forfeit $12 million and face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines. Garcia's sister, Dominga McCarroll, who is also the former vice president of both companies and Gina Luciano, Garcia Labor Co. Inc. director of human relations, also pleaded guilty to the same charge and will face the same possible penalties, minus the $12 million forfeiture.
    "Business owner pleads guilty in illegal alien case," Business Courier, October 3, 2006 --- http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2006/10/02/daily24.html



    Analogous to "clear-cutting the forest to catch a squirrel"

    "Bush Seeks Ban on Destructive Fishing," PhysOrg, October 3, 2006 --- http://physorg.com/news79102898.html

    President Bush called for a halt to all types of destructive fishing on the high seas Tuesday, saying the United States will work to eliminate practices such as bottom trawling that devastate fish populations and the ocean floor.

    Bush's memo directs the secretaries of the State and Commerce departments to promote "sustainable" fisheries and to oppose any fishing practices "that destroy the long-term natural productivity of fish stocks or habitats such as seamounts, corals, and sponge fields for short-term gain." Bush also said the United States would work with other nations and international groups to change fishing practices and create new international fishery regulatory groups if needed.

    On the high seas, where the vast marine life knows few laws, hundreds of boats drag huge nets along the sea floor scooping up orange roughy, blue ling and other fish - but bulldozing nearly everything else in their path.

    "It's like clear-cutting the forest to catch a squirrel," said Joshua Reichert, head of the private Pew Charitable Trusts' environment program, which has been leading an international coalition of more than 60 conservation groups seeking to halt the practice known as bottom trawling on the high seas.

    Continued in article


    Al-Qaida instructed terrorists to release sarin gas
    Al-Qaida commanders allegedly ordered the suicide bombers to get jobs at Edgbaston Cricket Ground and wipe out the Australian and England players. They were instructed to release sarin gas, a highly toxic nerve agent that is one of the world's most dangerous chemical weapons. But cricket-loving terrorist Shehzad Tanweer apparently objected and instead the terrorist cell perpetrated the July 7 underground Tube and bus bombings that killed 56 people and injured more than 700.
    Fiona Hudson and Mark Dunn, "Ashes death plot revealed," Australia's Herald Sun, October 9, 2006 ---
    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20547173-661,00.html 


    Facts from Naomi Ragen's Home Page --- http://www.naomiragen.com/

  • Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and playwright who has lived in Jerusalem since 1971. She has published six internationally best-selling novels, and is the author of a hit play in Israel's National Theatre. Naomi also publishes a regular email column, to which you can subscribe by sending an empty email message to: NaomiRagen-on@mail-list.com.

  •  




    Common Cartridge
    A Serious New Commercial Advance for Online Training and Education

    "Opening Up Online Learning," by Doug Lederman, Inside Higher Ed, October 9, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/10/09/cartridge

    This has not exactly been a season of peace, love and harmony on the higher education technology landscape. A patent fight has broken out among major developers of course management systems. Academic publishers and university officials are warring over open access to federally sponsored research. And textbook makers are taking a pounding for — among other things — the ways in which digital enhancements are running up the prices of their products.

    In that context, many may be heartened by the announcement later today at the Educause meeting in Dallas that three dozen academic publishers, providers of learning management software, and others have agreed on a common, open standard that will make it possible to move digital content into and out of widely divergent online education systems without expensive and time consuming reengineering. The agreement by the diverse group of publishers and software companies, who compete intensely with one another, is being heralded as an important breakthrough that could expand the array of digital content available to professors and students and make it easier for colleges to switch among makers of learning systems.

    Of course, that’s only if the new standard, known as the “Common Cartridge,” becomes widely adopted, which is always the question with developments deemed to be potential technological advances.

    Many observers believe this one has promise, especially because so many of the key players have been involved in it. Working through the IMS Global Learning Consortium, leading publishers like Pearson Education and McGraw-Hill Education and course-management system makers such as Blackboard, ANGEL Learning and open-source Sakai have worked to develop the technical specifications for the common cartridge, and all of them have vowed to begin incorporating the new standard into their products by next spring — except Blackboard, which says it will do so eventually, but has not set a timeline for when.

    What exactly is the Common Cartridge? In lay terms, it is a set of specifications and standards, commonly agreed to by an IMS working group, that would allow digitally produced content — supplements to textbooks such as assessments or secondary readings, say, or faculty-produced course add-ons like discussion groups — to “play,” or appear, the same in any course management system, from proprietary ones like Blackboard/WebCT and Desire2Learn to open source systems like Moodle and Sakai.

    “It is essentially a common ‘container,’ so you can import it and load it and have it look similar when you get it inside” your local course system, says Ray Henderson, chief products officer at ANGEL, who helped conceive of the idea when he was president of the digital publishing unit at Pearson.

    The Common Cartridge approach is designed to deal with two major issues: (1) the significant cost and time that publishers now must spend (or others, if the costs are passed along) to produce the material they produce for multiple, differing learning management systems, and (2) the inability to move courses produced in one course platform to another, which makes it difficult for professors to move their courses from one college to another and for campuses to consider switching course management providers.

    The clearest and surest upside of the new standard, most observers agree, is that it could help lower publishers’ production costs and, in turn, allow them to focus their energies on producing more and better content. David O’Connor, senior vice president for product development at Pearson Education’s core technology group, says his company and other major publishers spend “many hundreds of thousands of dollars a year effectively moving content around” so that ancillary material for textbooks can work in multiple course management systems.

    Because Blackboard and Web CT together own in the neighborhood of 75 percent of the course management market, Pearson and other publishers produce virtually all of their materials to work in those proprietary systems. Materials are typically produced on demand for smaller players like ANGEL, Desire2Learn and Sakai, and it is even harder to find usable materials for colleges’ homemade systems. While big publishers such as Pearson and McGraw-Hill have sizable media groups that can, when they choose to, spend what’s necessary to modify digital content for selected textbooks, “small publishers often have to say no,” O’Connor says. As a result, “there are just fewer options for people who aren’t using Blackboard and WebCT, and more hurdles to getting it.”

    Supporters hope that adoption of the common cartridge will allow publishers to spend less time and money adapting one textbook’s digital content for multiple course platforms and more time producing more and better content. “This should have the result of broadening choice in content to institutions,” says Catherine Burdt, an analyst at Eduventures, an education research firm. “Colleges would no longer be limited to the content that’s supported by their LMS platform, but could now go out and choose the best content that aligns with what’s happening in their curriculum.”

    Less clear is how successful the effort will be at improving the portability of course materials from one learning management system to another. If all the major providers introduce “export capability,” there is significant promise, says Michael Feldstein, who writes the blog e-Literate and is assistant director of the State University of New York Learning Network. “This has the potential to be one of the most important standards to come out in a while, particularly for faculty,” says Feldstein, who notes that his comments here represent his own views, not SUNY’s. “It would become much easier for them to take rich course content and course designs and migrate them from one system to another with far less pain.”

    But while easier transferability would obviously benefit the smaller players in the course management market — and ANGEL and Sakai plan to announce today that their systems will soon allow professors to create Common Cartridges for export out of their systems — such a system would only take off if the dominant player in the market, the combined Blackboard/WebCT, eventually does the same. “I’m not sure how excited Blackboard would be about making it easier for faculty to migrate out of their product and into one of their competitors,” says Feldstein.

    Chris Vento, senior vice president of technology and product development at Blackboard, was a leading proponent of the IMS Common Cartridge concept when he was a leading official at WebCT before last year’s merger. In an interview, he acknowledged the question lots of others are asking: “What’s in it for Blackboard? Why wouldn’t you just lock up the format and force everybody to use it?” His answer, he says, is that by helping the entire industry, he says, the project cannot help but benefit its biggest player, too.

    “This will enable publishers to really do the best job of producing their content, making it richer and better for students and faculty, and more lucrative for publishers from the business perspective,” says Vento. “Anything we can do to enable that content to be built, and more of it and better quality, the more lucrative it is eventually for us.”

    Blackboard is fully behind the project, Vento says. Having endorsed the Common Cartridge charter, Blackboard has also committed to incorporating the new standard into its products, and that Blackboard intends to make export of course materials possible out of its platform. “Exactly how that maps to our product roadmap has not been finalized,” he said, “but in the end, we’re all going to have to do this. It’s just a question of when.” There will, he says, “be a lot of pressures to do this.”

    That pressure is likely to be intensified because of the public relations pounding Blackboard has taken among many in the academic technology world because of its attempt to patent technology that many people believe is fundamental to e-learning systems. O’Connor of Pearson says he believes Blackboard could benefit from its involvement in the Common Cartridge movement by being seen “as the dominant player, to be someone supporting openness in the community.” He adds: “There is an opportunity for them to mend some of the damage from the patent issue.”

    Like virtually all technological advances — or would-be ones — Common Cartridge’s success will ultimately rise and fall, says Burdt of Eduventures, on whether Blackboard and others embrace it. “Everything comes down to adoption,” she says. “The challenge with every standard is the adoption model. Some are out the door too early. Some evolve too early and are eclipsed by substitutes. For others, suppliers decide not to support it for various reasons.”

    Those behind the Common Cartridge believe it’s off to a good start with the large number of disparate parties not only involved in creating it, but already committing to incorporate it into their offerings.

    Yet even as they launch this standard, some of them are already looking ahead to the next challenge. While the Common Cartridge, if widely adopted, will allow for easier movement of digital course materials into and out of course management systems, it does not ensure that users will be able to do the same thing with third-party e-learning tools (like subject-specific tutoring modules) that are not part of course management systems, or with the next generation of tools that may emerge down the road. For that, the same parties would have to reach a similar agreement on a standard for “tool interoperability,” which is next on the IMS agenda.

    “This is only one step,” Pearson’s O’Connor says of the Common Cartridge. But it is, he says, an important one.

    Bob Jensen's threads on education technology and distance education are linked at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/0000start.htm


    Question
    Who are the 50 hottest professors according to RateMyProfessors.com?

    Answer --- http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/hotProfs.html
    It helps to teach huge classes!
    The top seven have six red peppers
    The hottest professor is a Canadian psychology professor.
    Four of the top seven teach in Canadian universities.
    There are a surprising number of mathematics professors near the top.
    There's a scarcity of business professors near the top, although Business Policy professor Laura Allan from Wilfrid Laurier University (in Canada) is hot at Rank 11.
    Accounting professors are ice cubes in these rankings of hot professors.

    Question
    What topic dominates instructor evaluations on RateMyProfessors.com (or RATE for short)?
    Answer --- See http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/assess.htm#GradeInflation 

    Bob Jensen's critical threads on teaching evaluation controversies are at
    http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/assess.htm#GradeInflation

    October 5, 2006 reply from Dee (Dawn) Davidson [dgd@MARSHALL.USC.EDU]

    But there’s also this list on Business Week. Our Merle Hopkins is here.
    Click Here

    http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/sep2006/bs20060918_503106.htm?chan=bschools_undergrad+--+favorite+professors_favorite+professors 

    dee davidson
    Leventhal School of Accounting
    Marshall School of Business
    University of Southern California

     dgd@marshall.usc.edu 

    October 5, 2006 reply from Bob Jensen

    Dee's link mentioning the popularity of Professor Hopkins illustrates how misleading the outcomes can be for RateMyProfessor.com. Even though Professor Hopkins has huge classes, only 12 students bothered to send any ratings into the RateMyProfessor.com --- http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=18909

    There are definitely small (Epsilon?) sample problems, outlier problems, and a non-random/self-selecting sampling problems at RateMyProfessor.com. Also there is a tendency for disgruntled students to be more self-selecting than satisfied students. This is the case for Merle Hopkins.

    Bob Jensen

    October 5, 2006 reply from David Albrecht [albrecht@PROFALBRECHT.COM]

  • Congratulations Merle!

    The B-week list only lists faculty from their top b-schools. There could be other top accounting faculty, they just aren't at the few schools selected for the recognition.

    Dave Albrecht


  • Camtasia 4
    And another important new feature of Camtasia 4 – you can create Camtasia VIDEOS of your lectures in Ipod format. So the students can now study 24x7, wherever they are!

    Richard Campbell, October 3, 2006

    Bob Jensen's threads on Camtasia are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HelpersVideos.htm


    Women in MBA Programs

    September 29, 2006 message from Priscilla Reis [reispris@ISU.EDU]

    While these questions have nothing to do with technology, I'm sure someone on the list will have some insight. The gender balance of our undergraduate accounting program tends to fluctuate between 40 and 50% female. However, our population of female MBA applicants, and thus, students (combined accounting students and those concentrating in other areas), has gone down to less than 20%.

    Are other schools also suffering from a paucity of female MBA applicants/students? Does anyone know of any recent studies on gender balance in MBA programs? Has anyone developed effective methods for attracting more female students?

    Priscilla R. Reis, Ph.D., CMA
    Department of Accounting
    College of Business
    Idaho State University
    Box 8020 Pocatello, ID 83209
    reispris@isu.edu

    September 29, 2006 reply from Ellen Glazerman, Ernst & Young LLP [ellen.glazerman@EY.COM]

    Research has been done by the University of Michigan and C200. The percentage of women in MBA programs nationally is 30% (or less). this year has seen a slight increase in these numbers at the most competitive business schools in the US. GMAC has some of this most recent data. There is a Foundation - Forte Foundation: Inspiring Woman Business Leaders - that is a unique partnership between business schools and companies. You should get some good information from their website: fortefoundation.org. I hope it is helpful!

    Ellen

    September 29, 2006 reply from Bob Jensen

    Women now make up more than 60 percent of all accountants and auditors in the United States, according to the Clarion-Ledger. That is an estimated 843,000 women in the accounting and auditing work force.
    AccountingWeb, "Number of Female Accountants Increasing," June 2, 2006 ---
    http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=102218

    Since most states require at least 150 credits to sit for the CPA Examination, most of the men and women at the entry level have masters degrees.

    It is possible to check on the male/female proportion for selected programs at http://www.aacsb.edu/knowledgeservices/omd2/simple-srch.asp

    Member schools have access to all sorts of data on graduate and undergraduate business programs in the AACSB's huge databases --- https://www.aacsb.edu/knowledgeservices/datadirect/dd-intro.asp

    Also see the Management Education at Risk report https://www.aacsb.edu/publications/metf/default.asp

    October 2, 2006 reply from Tracey Sutherland [tracey@AAAHQ.ORG]

    It seems there's some recent evidence that more women managers bring equity to women in their companies (link below). On the other hand, our colleagues in sociology have been tracking for some time effects related to increased numbers of women in professions - one related to lower salaries is illuminated below in a fairly recent report from psychology.  Related to Bob's posting that women now make up about 60% of accountants, it's interesting to consider the possible implications of the trend over time.

    Tracey Sutherland
    Executive Director
    American Accounting Association

    From the Journal of Applied Psychology (2003) - Pay of Both Men and Women Managers is Less When Managers’ Subordinates, Peers and Supervisors are Women, Study Finds. Specific findings regarding gender and pay indicate that:

    • Managerial pay becomes substantially lower as the percentage of females that the manager supervises increases. For example, on average, a male or female manager whose subordinate group is comprised of 80% female receives approximately $7,000 less in pay than a manager whose subordinate group is 80% male.
    • Managerial pay remains relatively constant when the percentage of females that the manager supervises is less than 50%. However, once females become the majority in the workgroup, both male and female managers pay decreases sharply as the percentage of female subordinates in the workgroup increases. For example, a manager who supervises a group comprised of all women receives approximately $9,000 less than one who supervises a group comprised of 50% women.
    • On average, managerial pay decreases by approximately $500 for each 10% increase in the percentage of his or her female peers.
    • On average, a manager whose supervisor is female receives approximately $2,000 less pay than one whose supervisor is male.

    Women breaking the glass ceiling seems to help other women in the company -
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/12/AR2006081200858_pf.html

    October 3, 2006 reply from Linda Kidwell, University of Wyoming [lkidwell@UWYO.EDU]

    Thanks for the story Tracey.

    In reading the news story, there is some confusion as to whether they are discussing snapshots or trends. What I'm getting at is this: Is it that "as women move into management positions" in general, or as women in traditionally male or female fields move into management? If you read the piece through, it sounds like the real story is that women are starting to break the glass ceiling in traditionally male fields. Thus more of their subordinates are men, pay has traditionally been higher, thus pay continues to be higher. Where there are many junior management women, they are looking at traditionally female areas, and pay is lower, as it has always been. They haven't attempted any time series analysis to see what happened within any given industry as women entered management ranks. I don't really see that they've made the case that women at high ranks bring other women into better pay, or that women in lower ranks have a negative trending effect on men who work for them. So I don't really anticipate the influx of women into accounting depressing the pay of men in the profession. They are moving into (taking over? :-) ) a traditionally male field, so their pay should come up to par in accounting rather than bringing down the pay of men in the field.

    Perhaps I'm naive, but that's been my experience -- any pay differentials I've experienced have been when I taught at teaching focused smaller colleges (more female domain) relative to research focused universities (male domain), rather than a male/female differential within either type of school. And before I changed careers, I was clearly in traditionally female jobs, being paid peanuts. Working within the financial administration at Harvard at the beginning of the unionization movement among staff and lab workers, I still remember the organizers' slogan: "You can't eat prestige!" Pay at Harvard for staffers, most of them women, was a disgrace. But that's off point, I suppose, or is it?

    Linda

    October 4, 2006 reply from Bob Jensen

    An encouraging sign in terms of breaking the glass ceiling in accounting firms has been Deloitte's "Women's Initiative" commenced 12 years ago. Results to date are linked at http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/section_node/0,1042,sid%253D2261,00.html

     

    WIN 2005 Annual Report
    Women’s Initiative teams delivered more than 235 programs in 2005 and were honored with seven national awards. Our number of women partners, principals and directors rose along with our women in leadership positions. Learn about these and more achievements in the 2005 Annual Report.

    Blog Excerpts
    One way the Women's Initiative connects with our people is through the WIN blog on the Deloitte intranet site. The blog covers personal perspectives on topics ranging from work/life balance to gender bias to the power of networking. Read some recent excerpts.

    This week Deloitte's program for maintaining training programs and re-entry initiatives for women who take out time to raise a family made the national news in a very positive way.

    It also helped that Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers were recognized as two of the best (in the Top 10) companies in the U.S. for working mothers, according to an annual survey by Working Mother magazine.

    Progress in terms of working women and women planning career re-entry after raising a family  is probably greater in accountancy than in most industries.

    Bob Jensen

    "E&Y, PwC Top Employers for Working Mothers," SmartPros, September 27, 2006 --- http://accounting.smartpros.com/x54886.xml

    Bob Jensen's threads on women in accountancy and law professions are at
    http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob1.htm#careers


    "Trading in Harrah's Contracts Surges Before LBO Disclosure:  Options, Derivatives Make Exceptionally Large Moves; 'Someone...Was Positioning'," by Dennis K. Berman and Serena Ng, The Wall Street Journal, October 4, 2006; Page C3 --- http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB115992145253481882.html

    Trading in Harrah's Entertainment Inc. options and derivatives contracts reached a fevered pitch in the days leading up to news of a potential leveraged buyout of the gambling giant, making it the latest in a string of recent deals marked by unusual trading activity.

    At one point last week, the volume of "call" options, contracts to buy a specific number of shares by a fixed date at a specified price, increased to almost six times the August average. At about the same time, movements in the credit-default swap market suggested that traders in the sophisticated financial instruments were anticipating a potential buyout.

    Harrah's said Monday that it had received a $15.1 billion buyout offer from private-equity firms

    Apollo Management and Texas Pacific Group. The $81-a-share offer caused Harrah's shares to jump 14% and its bonds to fall 11% as the company's credit ratings were cut to "junk" by Standard & Poor's. Yesterday, the shares fell 1.3%, or 97 cents, to $74.71 as of 4 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The Las Vegas company is reviewing the buyout proposal and isn't certain a transaction will be sealed.

    Last Thursday, two trading days before the offer was announced, options traders exchanged 23,597 call contracts, nearly six times the August volume, according to Options Clearing Corp.

    "Clearly, someone out there was positioning for some movement in Harrah's," said Stacey Briere Gilbert, Susquehanna Financial Group's chief options strategist. "I don't know whether they were positioning for an LBO, but for something."

    Derivatives tied to Harrah's bonds also moved. The price of a five-year credit-default swap that protects an investor against a default in $10 million of Harrah's bonds climbed 24% last week to $114,000 annually, according to Markit Group.

    The price of Harrah's swaps more than doubled to $265,000 after Monday's announcement.

    These derivatives, which trade over the counter and are much more active than the bonds to which they are tied, are lightly regulated and traded mostly by big banks and hedge funds. Some investors use them to hedge against a debt default, while others use them to speculate on whether a company's default risk is rising or falling.

    As the options and derivatives markets experienced abnormal swings, Harrah's publicly traded shares were relatively flat last week. "The stock market is by far the slowest to respond," Ms. Briere Gilbert said.

    In a leveraged buyout, the company being acquired often ends up taking on additional debt, increasing its risk of default and causing the price of the swaps to rise. The firm's existing bonds also tend to fall in value on such news, pushing their yields higher as investors demand greater returns to compensate for the additional risk.

    In a market awash in rumor, speculation, and sometimes dumb luck, it can be hard to pinpoint who was trading and why such trading began. Often, an options trade unrelated to a deal can set off "piggyback" buying from traders hoping to catch a lucky break. Many such rumors -- as with a recent round of talk about Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. -- create a trading stir that ends in a whimper. No deal ever materialized for Starwood.

    Bob Jensen's "Rotten to the Core" threads are at
    http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudRotten.htm


    October 5, 2006 message from Carolyn Kotlas [kotlas@email.unc.edu]

    NEW TAKE ON PEER REVIEW OF SCHOLARLY PAPERS

    The Public Library of Science will launch its first open peer-reviewed journal called PLoS ONE which will focus on papers in science and medicine. Papers in PLoS ONE will not undergo rigorous peer review before publication. Any manuscripts that is deemed to be a "valuable contribution to the scientific literature" can be posted online, beginning the process of community review. Authors are charged a fee for publication; however, fees may be waived in some instances. For more information see http://www.plosone.org/.

    For an article on this venture, see: "Web Journals Threaten Peer-Review System" By Alicia Chang, Yahoo! News, October 1, 2006 --- http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061001/ap_on_sc/peer_review_science

    Bob Jensen's threads on peer review are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/assess.htm#PeerReview


    The Global Technology Revolution 2020 ---
    http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2006/RAND_TR303.pdf


    Question
    Is Harvard's curriculum tantamount to no curriculum?
    What does it take at a minimum to have an undergraduate education?

    "As Goes Harvard. . . ," by Donald Kagan
    See http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm#CustomizedCurricula

    Harvard University is Making Another Stab at Defining a Core Curriculum Requirement

    "Direction and Choice," by Scott Jaschik, Inside Higher Ed, October 5, 2006 --- http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/10/05/harvard

    On Wednesday, the university released a new plan for undergraduate education that would designate certain subjects as ones that must be studied. As a result, every Harvard undergraduate would have to take a course on the United States and a course dealing with religion, among others. Few top colleges and universities have such requirements. But students would be able to pick within those broad topics, with the idea that many courses would meet the requirements.

    . . .

    The report goes on to say that general education “prepares students to be citizens of a democracy within a global society” and also teaches students to “understand themselves as product of — and participants in — traditions of art, ideas and values.” General education should also encourage students to “adapt to change” and to have a sense of ethics, the report says.

    The general education proposed by the faculty panel would have students take three one-semester courses in “critical skills” in written and oral communication, foreign languages, and analytical reasoning.

    Then students would have to take seven courses in the following categories:

    Within these categories, there would be a broad range of courses that could fulfill the requirements. Each would have to meet certain general education requirements, such as providing a broad scope of knowledge and encouraging student-faculty contact. But the subject matter within categories could vary significantly.

    For instance, courses suggested as possibilities for the cultural traditions requirement include “The Emergence of World Literature,” “Art and Censorship,” and “Representations of the Other.” Courses for study of the United States could include “Health Care in the United States: A Comparative Perspective” and “Pluralist Societies: The United States in Comparative Context.” The reason and faith requirement, which would involve all students studying religion in some form, might have courses such as “Religion and Closed Societies” and “Religion and Democracy.”

    In explaining the rationale for a faith and reason requirement, the Harvard professors noted that most college undergraduates care about religion and discuss it, but “often struggle — sometimes for the first time in their lives — to sort out the relationship between their own beliefs and practices, the different beliefs and practices of fellow students, and the profoundly secular and intellectual world of the academy itself.”

    The report also noted the many tensions around religion in modern socie