While I'm under contract to write a book I
suspended weekly editions of Tidbits. However, when my monthly editions of New
Bookmarks become too cluttered with tidbits I will occasionally come out with a
special edition of Tidbits. This is a June 16, 2008 special edition.

Hi Dena,
It’s been a cold and
somewhat dry spring up here. The Lupin are late and not quite as impressive as
usual now
that they’re blooming. I think it’s been too bloomin’ cold in the mountains.
We finally got
some nice rain, but we could use much more.
We went from running
the furnace two days ago to running the air conditioners yesterday and today.
There is no spring up here. They’re too seasons --- winter and summer, although
we started running the air conditioners when the temperature hit 80 degrees so
summer here is not like summer in Texas.
My heating bill
may go from $2,500 to $5,000 next year. I haven’t heard about how cooling
costs are going in Texas. One advantage of air conditioners is that A/C
units became more more efficient the last 20 years. There’s not much new technology in
furnaces. Some people up here may close off parts of their houses for the
coldest months. There are millions of trees up here, but heating daily with wood
in a pain in the tail. Split hardwood is also becoming more expensive.
I
proposed that we stay in bed more during the day, but Erika’s not buying into
that fuel-saving idea
Bob
It's
the season for the annual Lupin Festival in Sugar Hill
What are Lupin? ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lupin



These are our wild roses along the front
fence.

This golf course that borders on two sides
of our home.

Above is one of the reasons I only found
time to play five holes of golf in five years.
A big old bull frog sings me to sleep at night accompanied by hoot owls.
Please check on your bank account ---
http://www.scottstratten.com/movie.html
Tidbits on June 16, 2008
Bob Jensen
For earlier editions of Tidbits go to
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TidbitsDirectory.htm
For earlier editions of New Bookmarks go to
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/bookurl.htm
Click here to search Bob Jensen's web site if you have key words to enter ---
Search Site.
For example if you want to know what Jensen documents have the term "Enron"
enter the phrase Jensen AND Enron. Another search engine that covers Trinity and
other universities is at
http://www.searchedu.com/.
Bob Jensen's past presentations and lectures
---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/resume.htm#Presentations
Bob Jensen's Threads ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/threads.htm
Bob Jensen's Home Page is at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/
CPA
Examination ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cpa_examination
On May 14, 2006 I retired from Trinity University after a long
and wonderful career as an accounting professor in four universities. I was
generously granted "Emeritus" status by the Trustees of Trinity University. My
wife and I now live in a cottage in the White Mountains of New Hampshire ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/NHcottage/NHcottage.htm
Bob Jensen's blogs and various threads on many topics ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/threads.htm
(Also scroll down to the table at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ )
Global Incident Map ---
http://www.globalincidentmap.com/home.php
Set up free conference calls at
http://www.freeconference.com/
Also see
http://www.yackpack.com/uc/
Free Online Tutorials in Multiple Disciplines ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials
Google Maps Street View ---
http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/
World Clock ---
http://www.peterussell.com/Odds/WorldClock.php
Tips on computer and networking
security ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ecommerce/000start.htm
If you want to help our badly injured troops, please check out
Valour-IT: Voice-Activated Laptops for Our Injured Troops ---
http://www.valour-it.blogspot.com/
Online Video, Slide Shows, and Audio
In the past I've provided links to various types of music and video available
free on the Web.
I created a page that summarizes those various links ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm
Ancient Mesopotamia: This History, Our History (video) ---
http://mesopotamia.lib.uchicago.edu/
A cleverly-constructed timeline on the history of the
world's great religions ---
http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/Religion.swf
How to Dispose of Energy Saving Light Bulbs ---
http://youtube.com/watch?v=e-LOtKIIKcg
The Labrador Inuit Through Moravian Eyes (video) ---
http://link.library.utoronto.ca/inuitmoravian/
The Energy Non-crisis ---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147&pr=goog-sl
(I don't know if the facts are straight, but I do believe this partly
true.)
Ordering Pizza in 2010 ---
http://aclu.org/pizza/images/screen.swf
Academics have also found Vertigo to be the most
concentrated distillation of Hitchcock's fascination with the act of seeing, a
favorite theme among film scholars for obvious reasons. The momentous glimpses,
glances, looks, and stares exchanged by Scottie and Judy/Madeleine add up to a
compendium of the gaze, illustrating its power to enthrall, gratify, deceive,
and even destroy. Associating the Hitchcockian gaze with the patriarchal gaze,
feminist critics like Laura Mulvey have often emphasized its harmful,
authoritarian effects in Vertigo and elsewhere. More eclectic commentators take
a broader view, however, finding more complexity in Hitchcock's films than
single-minded theories can encompass. In his recent book Hitchcock and
Twentieth-Century Cinema (Wallflower Press, 2005), for instance, the film
scholar John Orr says the fates of Hitchcock's characters are "bound up with
perceiving a world in flux," just as the success of his films is "bound up with
the spectator's pleasurable act of perceiving [the characters] perceiving."
Hitchcock's artistic vision is bound up with the nature of vision, and no film
penetrates its mysteries more deeply than Vertigo does. For a generation of
academics and critics, it has been a laboratory for investigating some of
cinema's most fundamental properties.
David Starrett, "At 50, Hitchcock's
Timeless 'Vertigo' Still Offers a Dizzying Array of Gifts," The Chronicle
Review, June 13, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i40/40b01801.htm?utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en
Free music downloads ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm
It's Hard to Be Humble (humor) ---
http://www.celeryhart.com/HardtobeHumble/hardtobehumble.swf
The Tennessee Plough Boy (Eddie Arnold) died on
May 8, 2008 one week short of being 90 years young..
He' a legend in country music ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_Arnold
Artie Shaw ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artie_Shaw
Yuji Ohno & Lupintic Sixteen - Lupin the Third
'78 ---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRoLgd7QQxk
Bob Jensen listens to music free online (and no commercials)
---
http://www.slacker.com/
Photographs and Art
Online Books, Poems, References, and Other Literature
In the past I've provided links to various
types electronic literature available free on the Web.
I created a page that summarizes those various links ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm
List: Revolution for Kids! Cory Doctorow recommends three
political books (not free) for young adults ---
http://www.reason.com/news/show/126848.html
1 Alan Mendelsohn, the Boy from Mars, by Daniel
Pinkwater: “One of my all-time favorite books, period. A subversive novel
about a kid who moves from a funky urbanized inner city neighborhood to a
place where he attends Heinrich Himmler junior high and is lost among very
plastinated people. He and a friend discover an occult book shop in the
funky neighborhood and go spelunking.”
2 Pretties, by Scott Westerfeld: “Well paced, and
wildly popular. It’s about the pressures on young people to conform,
specifically to physically conform and to switch off their minds while
they’re conforming. All Westerfeld’s books are good revolutionary texts.”
3 Animal Farm, by George Orwell: “It’s probably the
most perfect bit of political exposition disguised as fairy tale of all
time.”
Dylan Thomas ---
http://www.dylanthomas.com/
Not So Gentle Into That Good Night ---
http://poetry.suite101.com/article.cfm/dylan_thomas___do_not_go_gentle_
Free Online Video
Independence Day Quiz ---
http://games.toast.net/independence/
It's asserted that less than five percent of high school graduates can pass the
quiz.
Regardless of who wins in November, the attitudes of
Americans toward the role of identity in democratic life are unlikely to change
much. Relative to Europe, Americans will surely remain deeply patriotic and much
more committed to their faiths. Europeans, meanwhile, may move closer to the
Americans in their views. The recent shift to the right in Europe – from the
victory of conservative leaders like Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and Silvio
Berlusconi to the surprise defeat of the leftist mayor of London, Ken Livingston
– might partially reflect a belated awareness there that a unique heritage is
under assault by a growing Muslim fundamentalism. The logic of the struggle
against this fundamentalist threat will inevitably demand the reassertion of the
European national and religious identities that are now threatened. Europeans
are now saying goodbye to Mr. Bush, and hoping for the election of an American
president who they believe shares their sophisticated postnational, postmodern
and multicultural attitudes. But don't be surprised if, in the years ahead,
European leaders, in order to protect freedom and democracy at home, start
sounding more and more like the straight-shooting cowboy from abroad they now
love to hate.
Natan Sharansky, "Democracies Can't
Compromise on Core Values," The Wall Street Journal, June 16, 2008; Page
A15 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121358021414976189.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
What kind of government forces people to make
gasoline out of food, artificially boosts the price of corn to $6 a bushel,
guarantees that inflated price as the "base" for higher federal subsidies to
corn farmers in the future, and then tries to hide its own depredations by
excluding high food prices from its measure of "core" inflation? Washington
never learns from its mistakes. In "The Worst Hard Time," Timothy Egan notes how
federal price supports encouraged farmers in World War I to plow up millions of
acres of dry grasslands and plant wheat. When the price of wheat crashed after
the war, the denuded land lay fallow; then it blew away during the droughts of
the 1930s, turning a big chunk of America into a Dust Bowl.
Ernest S. Christian and Gary A Robbins,
"Stupidity and the State," The Wall Street Journal, June 7, 2008; Page A9
---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121279364915353389.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
On top of everything else, Washington
tries to cover up the cost of its failures and incompetence by officially
misstating the government's financial results. For instance, the government
says that the tax burden will be $2.6 trillion in 2008. But counting the
"deadweight" loss from damage done by taxes to the private economy, the real
tax burden is twice that – roughly $5.2 trillion, according to various
estimates, including ones published by the National Bureau of Economic
Research and the Congressional Budget Office. On the spending side, a study
by the Office of Management and Budget showed that government programs on
average fall 39% short of meeting their goals. Thus, in 2008, government
will spend $2.7 trillion to provide $1.65 trillion of benefit.
A real tax burden of $5.2 trillion to pay
for a $1.65 trillion benefit seems a bit excessive, even by Washington
standards. Perhaps one of the presidential candidates should do the voters
the courtesy of at least telling them the truth, and asking them if they
really want quite so much government at such a high price. Then again, maybe
the voters already sense the truth, and perhaps that is why they are so
furious.
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics,
the national gender ratio is 98 males to every 100 females. Compare to a global
average of 102 males to every 100 females, and to countries like China, which
has 107 males for every 100 females. Australia might not be the worst off in
this regard; America's ratio is 97 males to every 100 females, and Estonia's is
a distressing 85:100. But within Australia, the differences can be pronounced.
Six out of Australia's eight states and territories have lower numbers of males
than females.
Robert Skeffington, "Man Drought,"
The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2008 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121269592936449047.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
If only the metadata accompanying e-texts were as
interesting as that found in used books! Online bookseller
AbeBooks.com recently asked its vendors about the
strangest things they've found in used books. The list will surprise you: a
Christmas card from L. Frank Baum, a Mickey Mantle rookie card, a diamond ring,
a strip of bacon, $40,000, a World War II U.S. ration book, and even "a
holographic image of a lady who sheds her clothing," among other items. Surely
similar items have turned up in collections bequeathed to academic libraries
around the country. What strange things have you found in your library's old
books?
Catherine Rampell, Chronicle of
Higher Education, June 11, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3083&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Cuba is to abolish its system of equal pay for all
and allow workers and managers to earn performance bonuses, a senior official
has announced.
"Cuba to abandon salary equality," BBC News, June 12, 2008http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7449776.stm
As United States airlines reel from soaring oil
prices and a sinking domestic economy, most of their European rivals appear
better placed to ride out the storm. While no airline can avoid the oil price
shock, analysts say, European operators are benefiting from the relatively
strong euro, given that jet fuel is priced in dollars. European carriers also
fly relatively newer models of Boeing and Airbus planes, which burn 30 percent
less fuel than models from the 1970s and 1980s, many of which are still in use
by United States airlines.
The New York Times, June 12, 2008 ---
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/business/12air.html?ref=business
Jensen's Leading Questions for Obama and McCain
What are your plans to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and strengthen the U.S.
dollar? The weakening U.S. dollar, fueled by President's Bush's spendthrift
budgets, is the number one cause of high oil prices and jumps in inflation
pricing in the U.S. All other proposed causes are politicalsubterfuge intended
to avoid making the hard choices that will not win the presidency but will save
the nation.
Anyone wondering why U.S. energy policy is so
dysfunctional need only review Congress's recent antics. Members have debated
ideas ranging from suing OPEC to the Senate's carbon tax-and-regulation
monstrosity, to a windfall profits tax on oil companies, to new punishments for
"price gouging" – everything except expanding domestic energy supplies. Amid
$135 oil, it ought to be an easy, bipartisan victory to lift the political
restrictions on energy exploration and production. Record-high fuel costs are
hitting consumers and business like a huge tax increase. Yet the U.S. remains
one of the only countries in the world that chooses as a matter of policy to
lock up its natural resources. The Chinese think we're insane and
self-destructive, while the Saudis laugh all the way to the bank
"$4 Gasbags," The Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2008; Page
A16 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121322599645166029.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
California won't drill for the estimated 1.3 billion
barrels of recoverable oil off its coast because of bad memories of the Santa
Barbara oil spill – in 1969. We won't drill for the estimated 5.6 billion to 16
billion barrels of oil in the moonscape known as the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge (ANWR) because of – the caribou. In 1990, George H.W. Bush, calling
himself "the environmental president," signed an order putting virtually all the
U.S. outer continental shelf's oil and gas reserves in the deep freeze. Bill
Clinton extended that lockup until 2013. A Clinton veto also threw away the key
to ANWR's oil 13 years ago.
Daniel Henninger, "Drill! Drill!
Drill!," The Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2008; Page A15 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121322872046666269.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Also see
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66441
Although the Senate's recent attempt to introduce a
cap-and-trade system for carbon crashed and burned when it collided with $4 per
gallon gasoline, fear not. Some in Congress are fearlessly tilting at another
windmill: the "windfall" profits earned by oil companies. Unfortunately, by
reducing supplies, a windfall profits tax will only lead to even higher prices.
Still, if Congress really wants to "do something" about high gasoline prices and
global warming, it can always try rationing. To lower gasoline prices
permanently, you can reduce demand, increase supply, or do both. Congress long
ago capped supplies by proclaiming from on high: Drillest thou not offshore, nor
in ANWR. The next obvious step for our solons is to cap demand by rationing
gasoline, and then gradually reduce the quantity of ration coupons. "Trading" in
coupons would be encouraged to ensure gasoline is allocated to uses of only the
highest value. So Congress could reserve quantities of ration coupons for key
lobbyists and their clients. Environmentalists could buy up coupons and "retire"
them, lowering gasoline sales even more. Refineries could continue to produce
gasoline, but as consumer demand would be sharply limited (and declining), oil
companies would be forced to reduce the prices they charge. No more windfall
profits! And lower carbon emissions!
Jonathan Lesser, "Cap and Trade for
Gasoline?" The Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2008; Page A9 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121340131140573813.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Also see "Carbon: Tax, Trade, or Deregulate? Something is going to be "done"
about global warming, so what should it be? A debate," by Ronald Bailey, Fred L.
Smith and Lynne Kiesling, Reason Magazine, July 2008 ---
http://www.reason.com/news/show/126851.html
That such musings are no merely individual quirk is
confirmed by James Baldwin in an
essay written in his
mid-forties — a portion of which I have copied out onto a small piece of paper
and carried around in my wallet over the past several months. In it, Baldwin
writes: “Though we would like to live without regrets, and sometimes proudly
insist that we have none, this is not really possible, if only because we are
mortal. When more time stretches behind than stretches before one, some
assessments, however reluctantly and incompletely, begin to be made. Between
what one wishes to become and what one has become there is a momentous gap,
which will now never be closed. And this gap seems to operate as one’s final
margin, one’s last opportunity, for creation. And between the self as it is and
the self as one sees it, there is also a distance even harder to gauge. Some of
us are compelled, around the middle of our lives, to make a study of this
baffling geography, less in the hope of conquering these distances than in the
determination that the distance shall not become any greater. ”This passage helps
me keep my bearings. But I’ve broken the quotation off at that point because
Baldwin then shifts to a higher pitch of personal drama than quite resonates
given my own circumstances: “One is attempting,” he writes, “nothing less than
the recreation of oneself out of the rubble which has become one’s life....”Well
now that seems a bit much. Clutter, yes, but not rubble — though in saying that,
one has the sense of tempting fate . . . For better or worse, Intellectual
Affairs is firmly planted in the “baffling geography” that Baldwin describes as
occupying the zone between what one most deeply wants and that which actually
exists. After two hundred columns, I still don’t have a map. But it’s too late
to turn back now.
Scott McLemee, "200 and Counting,"
Inside Higher Ed, June 11, 2008 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2008/06/11/mclemee
To GOP strategists' frustration, focus groups still
show that many people don't know what Mr. Obama proposes policy-wise – and don't
care. They are drawn to his promise to move past political business as usual.
John "My Friends" McCain won't be able to match his rival's verbal mojo. He's
instead going to have to counter with a compelling theme of his own. First,
he'll have to find one.
Kimberly A. Strassel, "What We've
Learned About Barack," The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2008; Page A13
---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121270837880050313.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
And finally, how much more will college attendance
increase? Will it go to 100 percent (currently, about 60 percent of high school
graduates go on to college--of course many kids drop out of high school)? That
depends on two factors: the brain/brawn tradeoff, and IQ (or some alternative
measure of intellectual aptitude). If the intellectual demands of work relative
to the physical demands continue to increase, the demand for college will also
increase. IQ is, though, a limiting factor. But it is less of a limiting factor
than one might think. The reason is that a frequent byproduct of technological
advance is deskilling.
Richard Posner, "The Boom in College
Education," The Becker-Posner Blog, June 9, 2008 ---
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/
Jensen Comment
I wonder if Becker and Posner would've written their commentaries differently if
they were Wal-Mart Greeters for a week?
We are nearing the end of American identity politics
as we know it. Bearing that gift to those who prize the individual over the
tribal is a messenger who shared a Hyde Park neighborhood with Milton Friedman,
though with a public record that suggests he is more statist than classical
liberal. But Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.),
can’t be categorized that simply. He is, rather, an intellectual and ideological
work in progress. Not stuck in cable-babble caricatured time, he may be
traveling the circuitous path many “liberal-tarians”—or libertarian Democrats
like me—treaded as we grew and found our way back to the self-reliant values
that informed our pluralistic democracy. We lost those values in the Industrial
and Progressive eras, when advocates of centralized planning prized society’s
perfection over individual liberty. While Obama’s positions don’t exactly
channel the Cato Institute, his departure from usual Democratic Party
left-liberalism is reflected in the left’s suspicion of him for not having all
the 162-point plans of Sen. Hillary Clinton, or spewing the syrupy populism of
trial lawyer to the underclass, Sen. John Edwards.
Terry Michael, "Obama as the End of
Identity Politics as We've Known Them (And I Feel Fine)," Reason Magazine,
June 10, 2008 ---
http://www.reason.com/news/show/126944.html
But in many ways, it will be business as usual in
Washington DC with or without President Obama
An Absurd Way to Bring About "So-Called Change" in
Washington: Let Yesterday's Thieves Pave the Way for More Theft
"Friends of Barack," The Wall Street Journal, June 11,
2008; Page A22 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121314375651462773.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
A former CEO of mortgage financing giant Fannie
Mae, Mr. Johnson is now vetting Vice Presidential candidates for Mr. Obama.
But he is also a textbook case for poor disclosure as regulators sifted
through the wreckage of Fannie's $10 billion accounting scandal. Despite an
exhaustive federal inquiry, Mr. Johnson managed to avoid disclosing one very
special perk: below-market interest-rate mortgages from Countrywide
Financial, arranged by Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo. Journal reporters
Glenn Simpson and James Hagerty broke the story this weekend.
Fannie Mae tells us that Mr. Johnson did not inform
the company's board of these sweetheart mortgage deals, nor did his CEO
successor Franklin Raines, who also received such loans. We can understand
why. Fannie bought mortgages from loan originator Countrywide, and then
packaged them into securities for sale or kept the loans and profited from
the interest. Mr. Mozilo told Dow Jones in 1995 that he was "working very
closely . . . with Jim Johnson of Fannie Mae to come up with a rational
method of making the process more efficient by the use of credit scoring."
Since Fannie was buying Countrywide's loans, under
terms set by Mr. Johnson and later Mr. Raines – or by people in their employ
– the fact that Fannie's CEO had a separate personal financial relationship
with Countrywide was an obvious conflict of interest. The company's code of
conduct required prior approval of such arrangements. Neither Mr. Johnson
nor Mr. Raines sought such approval, according to Fannie.
Even if they had received waivers from the board to
enjoy these perks, conscientious board members would then have wanted to
disclose the waivers to investors. Post-Enron, the Sarbanes-Oxley law
requires such disclosures. But even in the late-1990s, when the Friends of
Angelo loans began, board members would likely have raised red flags.
Former SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt tells us that "the
best way to deal with issues like this is not to have these kinds of
relationships. From both the Countrywide and the Fannie perspective, it is
simply bad policy to permit loans to 'friends' on more favorable terms than
others similarly situated would be able to get."
One question is whether Messrs. Johnson and Raines
were using their position to pad their own incomes that were already
fabulous thanks to an implicit taxpayer subsidy. (See the table nearby.) But
the bigger issue is whether they steered Fannie policy into giving Mr.
Mozilo and Countrywide favorable pricing, which means they helped to
facilitate the mortgage boom and bust that Countrywide did so much to
promote. A further federal probe would seem to be warranted, and we assume
Barney Frank and his fellow mortgage moralists will want to dig into this
palm-greasing from Capitol Hill.
The irony here is that Mr. Obama has denounced Mr.
Mozilo as part of his populist case against corporate excess, calling Mr.
Mozilo and a colleague in March "the folks who are responsible for infecting
the economy and helping to create a home foreclosure crisis." Obama campaign
manager David Plouffe also said in March that "If we're really going to
crack down on the practices that caused the credit and housing crises, we're
going to need a leader who doesn't owe these industries any favors." But now
this protector of the working class has entrusted his first big task as
Presidential nominee to the very man who received "favors" in return for
enriching Mr. Mozilo.
Yesterday, ABC News asked Mr. Obama whether he
should have more carefully vetted Mr. Johnson and Eric Holder, who is
working with Mr. Johnson on veep vetting. Correspondent Sunlen Miller noted
Mr. Johnson's loans from Countrywide and Mr. Holder's involvement as Deputy
Attorney General in the Clinton Administration in the pardon of fugitive
Marc Rich. Said Mr. Obama: "Everybody, you know, who is tangentially related
to our campaign, I think, is going to have a whole host of relationships – I
would have to hire the vetter to vet the vetters."
Vetting Mr. Johnson's finances would have been time
well spent, judging by a May 2006 report from Fannie Mae's regulator, the
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo). Even if Mr. Obama
considers the advisers helping him select a running mate "tangentially
related" to his campaign, he might have thought twice about any relationship
with Mr. Johnson.
Addressing the company's too smooth (and
fraudulent) reported earnings growth in the late 1990s and early 2000s,
Ofheo reported: "Those achievements were illusions deliberately and
systematically created by the Enterprise's senior management with the aid of
inappropriate accounting and improper earnings management . . . By
deliberately and intentionally manipulating accounting to hit earnings
targets, senior management maximized the bonuses and other executive
compensation they received, at the expense of shareholders."
* * * The regulator described how, despite an
internal Fannie analysis that valued Mr. Johnson's 1998 compensation at
almost $21 million, the summary compensation table in the firm's 1999 proxy
suggested his pay was no more than $7 million. Ofheo found that Fannie had
actually drafted talking points to deflect such media questions as: "He's
trying to hide how much he's made, isn't he?" and "Gimme a break. He's
hiding his compensation."
To this list we would add one more, directed at Mr.
Obama: Is this what you mean by bringing change to Washington?
Update
James A. Johnson, the consummate Washington insider
whom Senator Barack Obama tapped to head his vice-presidential search effort,
resigned abruptly on Wednesday to try to silence a growing furor over his
business activities. Mr. Johnson’s departure deprives Mr. Obama of decades of
experience and access to Washington’s power elite. Mr. Johnson has been a
fixture in Washington political and legal circles for three decades, and he led
the vice-presidential search team for Senator John Kerry, the Democrats’
presidential nominee in 2004.
John M. Broder and Leslie Wayne, The New York Times, June 12,2008 ---
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/us/politics/12veep.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Bob Jensen's "Rotten to the Core" threads are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudRotten.htm

Local officials in this liberal city say it's time
for the U.S. Marines to move out. The Berkeley City Council has voted to tell
the Marines their downtown recruiting station is not welcome and "if recruiters
choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome guests." The measure
passed this week by a vote of 8-1.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327347,00.html
Jensen Comment
I can't think of anybody in Berkeley that the Marines would want.
The Berkeley City Council rescinded its earlier outright ban on the Marine recruiters
the fear that the University of California at Berkeley might lose hundreds of
millions in Federal government research contracts. The City of Berkeley does not
want to go too far in antagonizing its only good asset
--- the University of California. But the Berkeley City Council never passes up
a chance to insult the U.S. military. The only less-friendly cities to the U.S.
military are neighboring San Francisco and possibly Tehran although they might
be more polite about in Tehran.
Researchers at the University of
Munich have created new environmentally friendly bombs. The explosives commonly
used now by military and industry (such as TNT and RDX) hurt not only their
intended targets, but the environment as well by releasing toxic gases. They are
also relatively unsafe to handle,
LiveScience reports. The German scientists used
tetrazoles to create
explosives that release fewer toxic byproducts. Does this make you feel bad
about not recycling?
Catherine Rampel, Chronicle of Higher Education, June 4, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3057&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Question
What famous retailer is known for abusing accounts payable to vendors?
Hint:
In this mart, the buyer puts vendors to the “Wal.”
If textbook vendors were smart,
they'd just use Scott Adams for most of their illustrations.
"Stretching Accounts Payables." Financial Rounds, June 14, 2008 ---
http://financialrounds.blogspot.com/
Also enjoy the Dilbert cartoons!
Always open, always closed.
International Revolving Door Company slogan as quoted by Mark Shapiro at
http://irascibleprofessor.com/comments-06-05-08.htm
My friend, Sean, who taught
freshman composition and technical writing is a natural teacher. He brought his
real world corporate experience into the classroom, loved coming to work every
day and truly cared about everyone on his class roster. The students loved him.
He was rigorous, fair, and knowledgeable. He had a year-to-year full time
appointment, but no assurance of being rehired. Last week he packed his
briefcase for the last time, What a loss.
Beverly C. Lucey, "Migrants, Money, and Migraines: Headaches of the Adjunct
Professor," The Irascible Professor, May 20, 2008 ---
http://irascibleprofessor.com/comments-06-05-08.htm
The Case Against the World Wide Web
A provocative article in the forthcoming issue of
Atlantic Monthly argues that Web surfing is rewiring our brains, making us
unable to stay focused long enough to make it to the end of a book or long
article. To support his thesis, the author, Nicholas Carr, cites these scholars:
Bruce Friedman, of the University of Michigan Medical School; Maryanne Wolf, a
developmental psychologist at Tufts University; and James Olds, a professor of
neuroscience at George Mason University. Mr. Carr also mentions a report of
online research habits by scholars from University College London. A study by
the National Endowment for the Arts also seems to support Mr. Carr's argument.
The study, "To Read or Not to Read," showed, among other things, that the
portion of college graduates who were proficient in reading prose declined 23
percent from 1992 to 2003.
Andrea L. Foster, Chronicle of
Higher Education, June 12, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3085&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
For a short while the Atlantic Monthly
article ("Is Google Making Us Stupid?") may be downloaded free from
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google
I can feel it, too. Over the past few years I’ve
had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering
with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My
mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking
the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading.
Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind
would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d
spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the
case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three
pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to
do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The
deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.
I think I know what’s going on. For more than a
decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing
and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet. The Web has
been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the
stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes. A few
Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I’ve got the telltale
fact or pithy quote I was after. Even when I’m not working, I’m as likely as
not to be foraging in the Web’s info-thickets—reading and writing e-mails,
scanning headlines and blog posts, watching videos and listening to
podcasts, or just tripping from link to link to link. (Unlike footnotes, to
which they’re sometimes likened, hyperlinks don’t merely point to related
works; they propel you toward them.)
For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a
universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through
my eyes and ears and into my mind. The advantages of having immediate access
to such an incredibly rich store of information are many, and they’ve been
widely described and duly applauded. “The perfect recall of silicon memory,”
Wired’s Clive Thompson has written, “can be an enormous boon to thinking.”
But that boon comes at a price. As the media theorist Marshall McLuhan
pointed out in the 1960s, media are not just passive channels of
information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the
process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my
capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in
information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of
particles. Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the
surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.
I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles
with reading to friends and acquaintances—literary types, most of them—many
say they’re having similar experiences. The more they use the Web, the more
they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing. Some of the
bloggers I follow have also begun mentioning the phenomenon. Scott Karp, who
writes a blog about online media, recently confessed that he has stopped
reading books altogether. “I was a lit major in college, and used to be [a]
voracious book reader,” he wrote. “What happened?” He speculates on the
answer: “What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way
I read has changed, i.e. I’m just seeking convenience, but because the way I
THINK has changed?”
Bruce Friedman, who blogs regularly about the use
of computers in medicine, also has described how the Internet has altered
his mental habits. “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and
absorb a longish article on the web or in print,” he wrote earlier this
year. A pathologist who has long been on the faculty of the University of
Michigan Medical School, Friedman elaborated on his comment in a telephone
conversation with me. His thinking, he said, has taken on a “staccato”
quality, reflecting the way he quickly scans short passages of text from
many sources online. “I can’t read War and Peace anymore,” he admitted.
“I’ve lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or
four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.”
Anecdotes alone don’t prove much. And we still
await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will
provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition. But a
recently published study of online research habits, conducted by scholars
from University College London, suggests that we may well be in the midst of
a sea change in the way we read and think. As part of the five-year research
program, the scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of
visitors to two popular research sites, one operated by the British Library
and one by a U.K. educational consortium, that provide access to journal
articles, e-books, and other sources of written information. They found that
people using the sites exhibited “a form of skimming activity,” hopping from
one source to another and rarely returning to any source they’d already
visited. They typically read no more than one or two pages of an article or
book before they would “bounce” out to another site. Sometimes they’d save a
long article, but there’s no evidence that they ever went back and actually
read it. The authors of the study report:
It is clear that users are not reading online in
the traditional sense; indeed there are signs that new forms of “reading”
are emerging as users “power browse” horizontally through titles, contents
pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they go
online to avoid reading in the traditional sense.
Thanks to the ubiquity of text on the Internet, not
to mention the popularity of text-messaging on cell phones, we may well be
reading more today than we did in the 1970s or 1980s, when television was
our medium of choice. But it’s a different kind of reading, and behind it
lies a different kind of thinking—perhaps even a new sense of the self. “We
are not only what we read,” says Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist
at Tufts University and the author of Proust and the Squid: The Story and
Science of the Reading Brain. “We are how we read.” Wolf worries that the
style of reading promoted by the Net, a style that puts “efficiency” and
“immediacy” above all else, may be weakening our capacity for the kind of
deep reading that emerged when an earlier technology, the printing press,
made long and complex works of prose commonplace. When we read online, she
says, we tend to become “mere decoders of information.” Our ability to
interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read
deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged.
Reading, explains Wolf, is not an instinctive skill
for human beings. It’s not etched into our genes the way speech is. We have
to teach our minds how to translate the symbolic characters we see into the
language we understand. And the media or other technologies we use in
learning and practicing the craft of reading play an important part in
shaping the neural circuits inside our brains. Experiments demonstrate that
readers of ideograms, such as the Chinese, develop a mental circuitry for
reading that is very different from the circuitry found in those of us whose
written language employs an alphabet. The variations extend across many
regions of the brain, including those that govern such essential cognitive
functions as memory and the interpretation of visual and auditory stimuli.
We can expect as well that the circuits woven by our use of the Net will be
different from those woven by our reading of books and other printed works.
Continued in article
Jensen Comment
People generally
read some books for pure entertainment and the fast passage of time. With Agatha
Christie still being my favorite mystery writer, I read mystery books like
Agatha Christie might've written while I'm on airplanes and in hospital waiting
rooms and even while Erika shops. I read these without looking for embedded
messages other than learning about properties of some poisons if I ever did
undertake to commit murder
People read some books for the message, especially passages
from the Bible or Qur'an or biographies about great leaders or teachers like
Abraham Lincoln, Socrates, and Albert Einstein.
People read some classics for both entertainment and
embedded messages such as Moby Dick and the great books of Leo Tolstoy, although
I must admit that several times in my life I grew too weary of Tolstoy to ever
finish War and Peace. Often the benefits of the message are not worth the
wearying effort to wade through the verbiage. This is probably why even our best
writers often turn to short stories or magazine/journal articles or poems to
communicate their messages.
I don't blame the Internet for the decline in book reading
or the speed reading and scanning of books. The Internet is a fault only to the
extent that it is part of our frenetic lifestyles and the flood of information
from more and more books, articles, television, NetFlix DVDs, Blockbuster DVDs,
etc. Books have to compete with many newer alternatives aside from the Internet.
And our lifestyles just do not make it easy to find a few hours each day to read
a long book cover-to-cover. Admittedly part of the problem is the added time we
now devote to email messaging, blogs, online journals, podcasts, Webcasts, and
Bob Jensen's tidbits. But somehow I personally think I would be depriving myself
of much learning if I cut off my broadband cable and started working my way
through the classics or the endless stream of new, often poorly written,
so-called best sellers.
There's nothing sacrosanct about book reading in the
information age. Books must compete with other alternatives. And often books are
very worthwhile, although I must admit that I'm prone to speed reading and
scanning just like I was 50 years ago. There's more in Randy Pausch's new short
book than in his video speeches, television interviews, and most likely the
forthcoming movie about his life and death. Some books we just read to learn
more about what we can't find anywhere else. This makes books compete if they
contain more of what we are seeking. I'm not really seeking to learn more about
Barbara Walter's sex life, so I don't choose to read her autobiography. But
there are books that I seek out because I want to know more about particular
topics.
I find that the main advantage of a printed book is that I
like reading from hard copy rather than a computer screen and that I find books
to be better than any other alternative for perusing and scanning. I must admit
that I rarely, if ever, read every word in any book at any time. I guess this
goes with my Type A personality and aversion for wasting time even at things
like golf. There's a golf course on two sides of my property and a life-time
membership came with the purchase of my house. I've played a total of five holes
in five years up here in the mountains because there are better things to do
like spending ten hours a day on the Internet. Maybe there's something true
about "The Case Against the World Wide Web."
Perhaps my brain really has been altered by the WWW, at
least what's left of my aging brain!
Bob Jensen's threads on the dark side of education
technology are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/theworry.htm
June 13, 2008 reply from Orenstein, Edith
[eorenstein@FINANCIALEXECUTIVES.ORG]
Also of interest
on the subject of how the internet has impacted the way we learn and read
[and how we pay – or don’t pay- or indirectly pay a third party (vs. content
provider) - for that privilege] is in blog post by Barry L. Ritholtz
(analyst who has appeared on
CNBC among other places) in his blog called “The Big Picture”
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/06/word-of-the-day.html which
links to article by Chris Anderson, Editor in Chief of Wired magazine (wired.com),
“Free! Why $0.00 is the Future of Business”
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=1 .
Separately, with
advent of WWW, I am very interested in views this readership has on
Distance Learning – including:
are there any distance learning programs to get a PhD in Accounting, are any
distance learning programs (undergrad/masters level) currently seeking
professionally qualified (PQ vs. AQ) instructors, and any thoughts on
ability of distance learning programs to provide quality education in
accounting or business generally as well as PhD programs specifically. I
joined Prof. Jensen’s listserv recently and I apologize if this topic was
previously covered.
Thank you.
Edith
Orenstein, FEI
eorenstein@financialexecutives.org
www.financialexecutives.org
Blog:
http://www2.financialexecutives.org/blog/blog.cfm?blog_id=1 )
June 13, 2008 reply from Bob Jensen
Hi Edith,
Thank you for the informative reply.
I’ve always claimed there are no respectable or even satisfactory online
doctoral programs in accounting. Thus far nobody has convinced me otherwise.
The most popular online alternatives are to get an online law degree or a
PhD in business (not accounting), technology, or education and then teach
accounting based upon your accounting credentials such as a CPA, CA, or
Masters in Accountancy or Taxation ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/CrossBorder.htm#CommercialPrograms
.
Since there is such an enormous shortage of new PhDs in accounting,
sometimes doctoral graduates in other fields can get accounting tenure track
positions, especially when their theses make worthy contributions to
accounting research. But it’s important to remember that leading
universities can be pretty snobby when it comes to accounting tenure tracks.
And I might add that the AECM is not my listserv even though it may seem
like it at times.
Bob Jensen
June 16, 2008 reply from Jagdish Gangolly [gangolly@CSC.ALBANY.EDU]
Bob,
I must disagree. I ind it amusing when such blanket
statements are made on a phenomenon before it is fully understood.
I think the web's advantages far outweigh its
disadvantages. Also, blaming the web for the follies of those who misuse it
is like blaming guns for murders.
I thought you'll find the following article in the
Forbes by Robert Metcalfe (inventor of the ethernet) interesting:
It's All In Your Head Robert M. Metcalfe 05.07.07
http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2007/0507/052.html
Jagdish
A big difference that has taken
place in the last 40 years is that when I started the typical working paper,
double-spaced, was 20 to 25 pages. But now they are 60 to 70 pages, and as I get
older and my eye sight deteriorates especially, I find this a terrible thing. I
wish people would put their ideas in a punchier, simpler way.
"An Interview with Avinash Dixit," Forthcoming in the Royal Economic
Society Newsletter ---
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/faculty/oswald/avinashdixit.pdf
From the Finance Clippings blog on June 12, 2008 ---
http://financeclippings.blogspot.com/
Stephen Dubner at the freakonomics blog has a
bleg out for finance sayings.
One of my faves is
The market can stay irrational longer than you
can stay solvent.
Keynes
Jensen Comment
Here are some others ---
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/our-daily-bleg-wall-street-proverbs-please/
Bulls make money Bears make money pigs get
slaughtered. — Posted by charles
God gave you eyes. Plagiarize. - quoted in Liar’s
Poker by Michael Lewis, Work smarter, not harder. — Posted by Shane
Don’t try to catch a falling knife The market can
stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. - Keynes
You only find out who is swimming naked when the
tide goes out. - Buffet — Posted by Broadway
“Be Fearful When Others Are Greedy and Greedy When
Others Are Fearful” — Warren Buffett
“Buy the rumor, sell the fact” — Posted by Phil
“Buy on the sound of the cannon, Sell on the sound
of the trumpet”, I read this quote in Ben Stein’s column on Yahoo Finance,
it’s a great blog (as is this one). — Posted by James Burden
“Trees don’t grow to the sky.”
“Even a dead cat
will bounce if it drops from high enough.”
“No one ever went broke taking profits.” — Posted
by Marton
“Even a dead cat can bounce” — Posted by Drew 9.
I remember an SNL skit after the ‘87 crash. It was
Wall Street Week with a guest named “Futureman” he had the best investing
mantra ever: “Read old newspapers, look at historic charts, go back in time,
buy low, sell high.” — Posted by Greg
The stock market is like a beauty contest. Don’t
pick the prettiest girl; Pick the one everyone else thinks is the prettiest.
(Keynes?) — Posted by Adam J. Fein
June 12th, 2008 12:44 pm “When there is blood on
the streets, buy real estate”. Le Baron de Rothschild (so said Jodie Foster
in 2006’s Inside Man). — Posted by luz
I like them in matched pairs: No one ever went
broke taking profits - sell you losers and let your winners ride. Don’t
fight the tape/the trend is your friend - buy when there is blood in the
streets. I would be surprised if there are any cliches that don’t have an
opposite. — Posted by ziggurat
“Where Are the Customers’ Yachts?” (Fred Schwed) —
Posted by DK1
From Keynes - In the long run, we’re all dead. —
Posted by John
Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered. — Posted by
Bylo Selhi
October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous
months to speculate in stocks in. The others are July, January, September,
April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February. (Mark
Twain) Those who live by numbers can also perish by them and it is a
terrifying thing to have an adding machine write an epitaph, either way.
(George J.W. Goodman) — Posted by Justin
Just to go with volume, a slight tweak to #2. Bears
make money; bulls make money; pigs lose their shirt. Which I like better
than slaughter, although now that I think on it, slaughter makes more sense
than fashion losing hogs. I thought there were more of these aphorisms. I
guess not. — Posted by Erika
Think big, think positive, never show any sign of
weakness. Always go for the throat. Buy low, sell high. Fear? That’s the
other guy’s problem. Nothing you have ever experienced will prepare you for
the absolute carnage you are about to witness. Super Bowl, World Series -
they don’t know what pressure is. In this building, it’s either kill or be
killed. You make no friends in the pits and you take no prisoners. One
minute you’re up half a million in soybeans and the next, boom, your kids
don’t go to college and they’ve repossessed your Bentley. Are you with me? —
Louis Winthorpe III — Posted by Sail Boffin
“For every cliche, there is an equal and opposite
cliche.” — Posted by zbicyclist
Buy the dips, sell the rips. — Posted by Dan M
From the subprime mess, “A rolling loan gathers no
loss.” — Posted by Evan
"Staying Smart in Dumbed-Down Times," by Judith
Shapiro, Inside Higher Ed, June 13, 2008 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2008/06/13/shapiro
In 1963, when I was graduating from college, a book
was published entitled Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by the
noted historian Richard Hofstadter. In exploring anti-intellectualism as a
major current of American culture, Hofstadter examined various facets of our
nation’s history over time. He described how those living in rural areas
grew suspicious of urban life. He analyzed how utilitarianism and
practicality, associated with the world of business, were accompanied by a
certain contempt for the life of the mind. He devoted special attention to
evangelicalism, although we should perhaps more specifically define his
target as fundamentalism, a literal-minded approach to the Bible that
involved hostility to all forms of knowledge that contradicted scripture or
sought to interpret it as a set of historical documents reflecting the
context of its production. He noted how all of this combined to make the
term “elite” a dirty word.
This exploration of American national character,
which was very much a product of his times, notably the atmosphere of fear
and distrust that characterized the Cold War, is still quite timely today.
Which is why I felt compelled to re-read Hofstadter’s book last summer. And
why I was particularly interested in reading an update and homage to
Hofstadter by Susan Jacoby, whose book The Age of American Unreason
was published just this year.
Jacoby brings Hofstadter’s arguments into the
present, illustrating them with examples from the times in which we live
today. She talks about the powerful role played by fundamentalist forms of
religion in current America; about the abysmal level of public education;
about the widespread inability to distinguish between science and
pseudoscience; about the dumbing-down of the media and politics; about the
consequences of a culture of serious reading being replaced by a rapid-fire,
short-attention-span-provoking, over-stimulating, largely visual,
information-spewing environment.
She, like Hofstadter, invites us to consider how
all of this has affected the great venture that is American democracy? So,
let us do so.
Once upon a time, the leaders of our country were
the kind of men — and, let’s face it, it was a men’s club at the time — who
were learned, who valued scholarship and science. The American Philosophical
Society, founded in 1743 at the instigation of Benjamin Franklin, counted
also among its early members presidents George Washington, John Adams,
Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.
In adopting as its mission the promotion of “useful
knowledge”, the American Philosophical Society reflected a time in which the
sciences and the humanities were not divided from one another, and in which
there was no opposition between what we might now call pure and applied
science. What it did reflect was an opposition between Enlightenment values
of reason and empirical research, on the one hand, and what we might call
“faith based” beliefs, on the other. There were clergymen among the early
members of the APS, but they were those who felt that their religious
convictions did not stand in their way of their desire to be among the most
educated members of their society.
That was then. This is now: We have a president who
believes that “creation science” should be taught in our schools. As Jacoby
points out, we should understand “how truly extraordinary it [is] that any
American president would place himself in direct opposition to contemporary
scientific thinking.”
But let’s not just pin the tail on the elephant
here and pick only on the Republicans — or, to be more precise, on the
extreme right wing of the Republican party, since there are, after all
(though they may be increasingly hard to locate), moderate, thoughtful — one
might even say, liberal — Republicans.
Let’s look at the Democrats, at the nomination
fight we all followed – followed, it seems, since the early Pleistocene.
Here we had two candidates vying to run for President who had been educated
at institutions that are among the most distinguished in our country:
Wellesley, Yale, Columbia and Harvard. Both candidates were obviously highly
intelligent and knowledgeable. Yet both felt the need to play down their
claims to intellectuality — and the winner may still feel that need in the
general election. Hillary Clinton chugalugged beer and sought to attach the
dread label of “elitist” to her rival. And Barack Obama felt compelled to
follow one of the most honest and sophisticated political speeches in recent
memory with strenuous displays of folksiness.
And who are we to blame them? If anyone is going to
serve as president, the first step is to get elected. What level of
intellectual interest and background can political candidates presuppose on
the part of our nation’s citizenry? What level of interest in the most
important challenges facing us in the years ahead? What level of public
demand that assertions be backed up with sound reasoning and actual facts?
To take just one example: citing data from the Pew
Forum on Religion and Public Life, released in 2005, Jacoby notes that
two-thirds of Americans believe that both evolution and creationism should
be taught in our public schools. Who would have thought that, all these
years after the United States became the laughing stock of the civilized
world through international newspaper coverage of the Scopes trial, we would
still see the fight we have recently seen in the state of Pennsylvania over
teaching creationism in our public schools?
Nor is this simply a matter of religious belief.
Many who advocate teaching creationism do so in the name of providing a
“fair and balanced” curriculum. This misplaced pluralism, which draws no
distinction between the results of scientific inquiry and the content of
folk beliefs, is in line with the loose way in which the word “theory” is
used, such that Einstein’s “theory” of relativity or Darwin’s “theory” of
evolution is on a par with the loose way we use “theory” to describe any
kind of wild guess. In this latter sense, “theory” is used as the opposite
of “fact”, rather than as a systematic set of hypotheses to explain a
variety of facts. Moreover, simply changing the label from “creationism” to
“creation science” or “intelligent design” gives this set of untestable and
unfalsifiable assertions the veneer of science, which is quite enough for a
lot of people who have little or no sense of what real science is.
But let us not let the scientists and scholars
themselves off the hook. Jacoby devotes some interesting passages in her
book to forms of pseudo-science that were at various times in our history
embraced by members of the most educated classes. Back in the 19th and early
20th centuries, we had social Darwinism, which sought to justify differences
between rich and poor as a reflection of “survival of the fittest” (which,
by the way, was not an expression coined by Darwin). And lest we look upon
those benighted forebears too complacently, let us keep in mind that, much
more recently, we have had sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, which
share many of the same faults, though in more sophisticated trappings, as
befits the trajectory of the natural and social sciences since the 19th
century unilinear evolutionism of Herbert Spencer and others.
Returning to the world of politics, the first
presidential candidate I campaigned for myself — I was 10 years old at the
time and we were having a mock convention in my elementary school (those
were the days when candidates actually got chosen at the party’s national
convention) — that first presidential candidate was the quintessential,
unelectable intellectual Adlai Stevenson, who ran against Dwight Eisenhower.
One of the well-known anecdotes about him is the time a woman went up to him
after a speech and said, “Mr. Stevenson, every thinking American will be
voting for you.” To which he replied, “Madam, that is not enough. I need a
majority.”
In her chapter on “Public Life”, which is subtitled
“Defining Dumbness Downward”, Jacoby opens by talking about the
extemporaneous speech given by Robert Kennedy on April 4th, 1968, when he
had just learned, before taking the stage in Indianapolis, that the Reverend
Martin Luther King, Jr. had just been assassinated in Memphis. Kennedy began
by invoking from memory the following lines from Aeschylus:
Even in our sleep, pain which we cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
Until, in our own despair,
Against our will,
Comes wisdom
Through the awful grace of God.
Jacoby notes how inconceivable it is today that a
major political figure, an aspirant to the highest office in the land, would
use such a quote, given the pervasive fear nowadays of seeming to be an
“elitist.” Yet Robert Kennedy was not showing off to his audience or
condescending to them. He just assumed that he could address them in this
way, whether or not they themselves were familiar with these lines, much
less could quote them from memory.
Jacoby’s discussion of the dumbing down of our
public, political culture follows a chapter on what she calls “The Culture
of Distraction”. She worries over the consequences of our being constantly
bombarded by noisy stimuli, by invitations to multitask in a way that
fosters superficiality as opposed to depth. The major casualties of our
current media-saturated life are three things essential to the vocation of
an intellectual: silence, solitary thinking, and social conversation.
Continued in article
New Wiki Helps Humanities Researchers Find Online Tools
A new wiki provides a directory of online tools for
humanities scholars. The site, which uses software that lets anyone edit or add
to the material, covers more than 20 categories, including blogging tools,
specialized search engines for scholars, and software programs that can record
what is on a user's screen. The site, called Digital Research Tools, or DiRT, is
run by Lisa Spiro, director of the Digital Media Center at Rice University. The
Center for History and New Media at George Mason University runs a similar
collection of resources called
Exploring and Collecting History Online, or ECHO.
Jeffrey R. Young, Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3068&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Now you can write modules for Encyclopedia
Britannica (well sort of in their "not responsible" section)
Encyclopaedia Britannica Goes -- Gasp! -- Wiki
Long a standard reference source for scholarship,
largely because of its tightly controlled editing, the
Encyclopaedia Britannica announced this week it was
throwing open its elegantly-bound covers to the masses. It will allow the "user
community" (in the words of the encyclopedia's blog) to contribute their own
articles, which will be clearly marked and run alongside the edited reference
pieces. This seems to be a response to the runaway success of the user-edited
online reference tool
Wikipedia. (See
for yourself. Do a Web search on a topic and note whether Wikipedia or
Britannica shows up first.) Scholars have been adamantly opposed to Wikipedia
citations in academic papers because the authors and sources are always
changing. Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia's co-founder, agrees with this, but in next
week's issue of The Chronicle (click back to our home page on Monday for more)
he also points to some changes in the reference tool that may make it more
palatable to scholars. At Britannica, "readers and users will also be invited
into an online community where they can work and publish at Britannica’s site
under their own names," the encyclopedia's blog explains. But it's not a
complete free-for-all. The voice of Britannica adds that the core encyclopedia
itself "will continue to be edited according to the most rigorous standards and
will bear the imprimatur 'Britannica Checked' to distinguish it from material on
the site for which Britannica editors are not responsible."
Josh Fischman, Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6, 2008 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3064&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Jensen Comment
This might be the wave of the future for academic research journals. In a
journal's online archives could be those "set in stone" reviewed articles given
a blue ribbon. Then there could be the "open source communications" for
contributions that are edited and revised by the world in general. The academic
community will ultimately have to judge whether two or three editor-assigned
(anonymous) reviewers have more cost-benefit to scholarship than the entire
world of (signed) reviewers.
Question
Are refereed journals set in stone for the academy's tenure and performance
evaluations in the age of newer technology?
"Colleges Are Reluctant to Adopt New Publication Venues," by Andrea L.
Foster, Chronicle of Higher Education, December 17, 2007 ---
http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2617&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Academe has been slow to accept new forms of
scholarship like blogs, wikis, and video clips, according to a report
released last week that examines emerging technology trends in higher
education. The
Horizon Report 2007 predicts that in four to five
years, academe will accept as scholarship this kind of interactive online
material and will develop methods for evaluating it.
The document notes that the change serves to encourage the public to
participate in the production of research and scholarly works. An author who
posts a draft of his or her book online, for example, can receive immediate
feedback on ways to improve the work, the report states. The document was
developed by Educause and the
New Media Consortium, two higher-education technology groups.
The report also concludes that within one year,
social-networking sites will be widely used in teaching and learning, and
that mobile phones and virtual worlds will be used in this way in two to
three years.
Bob Jensen's threads on higher education controversies
are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm
Bob Jensen's threads on knowledge bases are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Searchh.htm#KnowledgeBases
Western Governors University,
which was founded in 1997 as a collaboration of colleges in 19 states offering
online programs, was for many years known for not meeting the ambitious goals of
its founders. Projected to attract thousands of students within a few years, it
initially attracted but scores of students. But the university has been growing
lately, and on Wednesday announced that
enrollment has hit 10,000, including students from
all 50 states.
Inside Higher Ed, June 5, 2008 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/05/qt
Jensen Comment
Some of the things that made WGU controversial were as follows:
-
Before spreading to other states it was sponsored by
four governors largely concerned with reducing the cost and increasing the
availability of higher education;
-
It went online before online tools were as developed as
they are today, and online learning was not yet accepted by most educators
or students;
-
It acquired an early reputation for being career
focused, which often riles humanities departments --- many educators
appeared to predict and enjoy the life-threatening struggles of WGU;
-
It was and is still a competency-based program that
takes much of the subjectivity of grading and graduation out of the hands of
instructors who traditionally have the option of fudging grades for such
things as effort.
WGU now has many undergraduate and graduate degree
programs, including those in traditional fields of business such as accounting,
marketing, etc. ---
http://www.wgu.edu/
Some tidbits on history of WGU are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Crossborder.htm
Judith Boettcher in Syllabus, June 1999, 18-24 Judith
Boettcher is affiliated with CREN. She predicts the following scenarios (which
appear to be heavily in line with the emerging WGU programs mentioned above):
1. A "career university" sector
will be in place (with important partnerships of major corporations with
prestige universities).
2. Most higher education institutions, perhaps 60
percent, will have teaching and learning management
software systems linked to their back office administration systems.
3. New career universities will focus on
certifications, modular degrees, and skill sets.
4. The link between courses
and content for courses will be broken.
5. Faculty work and roles will make a dramatic shift
toward specialization (with less stress upon
one person being responsible for the learning material in an entire course).
(Outsourcing Academics
http://www.outsourcing-academics.com/ )
6. Students will be savvy consumers
of educational services (which is consistent with the Chronicle of
Higher Education article at
http://chronicle.com/free/99/05/99052701t.htm ).
7. The tools for teaching and learning will become as
portable and ubiquitous as paper and books are
today.
An abstract from On the Horizon
http://horizon.unc.edu/horizon/online/login.asp
Will Universities Be Relics? What Happens When an Irresistible
Force Meets an Immovable Object? John W. Hibbs
Peter Drucker predicts that,
in 30 years, the traditional university will be nothing more than a relic.
Should we listen or laugh? Hibbs examines Drucker's prophesy in the light of
other unbelievable events, including the rapid transformation of the Soviet
Union "from an invincible Evil Empire into just another meek door-knocker at
International Monetary Fund headquarters." Given the mobility and cost
concerns of today's students, as well as the growing tendency of employers
to evaluate job-seekers' competencies rather than their institutional
affiliations, Hibbs agrees that the
brick-and-mortar university is doomed to extinction.
Bob Jensen's threads on higher education controversies
are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm
Bob Jensen's threads on online training and education
alternatives are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Crossborder.htm
Question
How do for-profit-colleges and universities differ fundamentally from
traditional colleges and universities?
At the
beginning of their new book on for-profit higher education,
William G. Tierney and Guilbert C. Hentschke talk about the
academic division between “lumpers” and “splitters,” the former
focused on examining different entities or phenomena as
variations on a theme and the latter focused on classifying
entities or phenomena as truly distinct. In
New Players, Different Game: Understanding the Rise of
For-Profit Colleges and Universities,
just published by Johns Hopkins University
Press, Tierney and Hentschke consider the ways for-profit
colleges are part of or distinct from the rest of higher
education. Tierney and Hentschke are professors at the Rossier
School of Education at the University of Southern California,
where Tierney is also director of the Center for Higher
Education Policy Analysis. They responded to questions via
e-mail about their new book . . . For-profits are not,
technically, just a ‘technology.’ But they do function in a
manner that is radically different from the manner in which
traditional postsecondary institutions function. For-profits,
like their traditional brethren, come in many shapes and sizes —
some are gigantic (such as the University of Phoenix) and others
are small barber’s colleges. What differentiates them from
traditional institutions is that they have a different
decision-making model, different ways to develop and deliver the
model, and different ways to measure success. The point is not
that all for-profits utilize distance learning (because they do
not), but that they eschew the established norms of the academy
and pursue success in quite different ways.
Scott Jaschik, "New Players, Different Game," Inside Higher
Education, August 30, 2007 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/08/30/forprofit
For the first
time, a for-profit education company has received permission to
offer degrees in Britain,
The Guardian reported.
Inside Higher Ed, September 26, 2007 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/09/26/qt
With
Grand Canyon Education planning an initial public offering, an
article in
The Wall Street Journal
explores the state of the for-profit market on Wall Street.
Several for-profit entities are seeing stocks increase, with
analysts feeling particularly favorable about online education.
Inside Higher Ed, June 5, 2008 ---
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/05/qt
"Online College Plans IPO In
Rough Market," by Lynn Cowan, The Wall Street Journal,
June 5, 2008; Page C3 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121263175442747247.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Investing in
for-profit colleges is often considered a haven during a
rocky economy. But turmoil in the student-loan market could
add a hint of uncertainty to Grand Canyon Education Inc.'s
plans for an initial public offering of stock this year.
The company,
which acquired 55-year-old Grand Canyon University in 2004
and converted it from a traditional nonprofit
bricks-and-mortar college to a school that also offers
online degrees, registered last month with the Securities
and Exchange Commission to raise as much as $230 million in
an IPO.
Based in
Phoenix, the company hasn't set a price range, share size or
date yet for its offering, which it plans to list on the
Nasdaq Stock Market under the trading symbol LOPE.
Smart Money?
Many of
Grand Canyon's public peers -- Strayer Education Inc., which
operates Strayer University; Capella Education Co.; and
American Public Education Inc. -- have been trending higher
since hitting 2008 lows in March. Capella rose 26% on its
first day of trading in November 2006 and is now more than
triple its $20 IPO price, while American Public Education
rose 80% on its first day in November, the third-best debut
of 2007, and is up about 78% from its $20 IPO price.
Apollo Group
Inc., which operates the University of Phoenix, hasn't shown
the same upward trend as its peers since March; late that
month the company reported earnings for its second quarter,
ended Feb. 29, that missed analysts' estimates.
"There's an
association between increased unemployment figures and
increasing enrollment of adults in postsecondary schools,"
says Richard Garrett, program director and senior research
analyst for education research and consulting firm
Eduventures. "The underlying story for these firms remains
positive."
Colleges
that offer an online-degree component are viewed in an
especially positive light, according to Mr. Garrett and
other industry watchers, because it is easier and more
economical to expand their programs.
Earlier IPO
Grand Canyon
isn't alone in its interest in tapping the public markets;
earlier this year, Education Management Corp. filed to
return to the public markets after going private in 2006.
What's less
clear is how the student-loan environment will fare in the
future.
Lower demand
among debt investors for student-loan securities, combined
with a new law that cut the subsidies student-loan issuers
get on Federal Family Education Loans, has caused some
lenders to leave the market and others to pare back.
"This summer
will be zero hour for determining whether the loan market in
its current form will be able to serve students adequately,
or whether there is further uncertainty on the horizon. The
bulk of students will be receiving their loans in June and
July," says Jessica Lee, an investment banker at Rittenhouse
Capital Partners, which specializes in education and
technology.
Ms. Lee
believes that the for-profit education market should remain
strong because of economic conditions and investors' flight
to safety; most for-profit schools have low debt levels,
along with high profit margins and free cash flow.
June 5, 2008 reply from Richard C. Sansing
[Richard.C.Sansing@TUCK.DARTMOUTH.EDU]
The *fundamental* difference is that non-profit
colleges and universities face what Hansmann (1980) calls the
"non-distribution constraint."
See
http://www.learningtogive.org/papers/index.asp?bpid=177
June 5, 2008 reply from Hossein Nouri --- hnouri
[hnouri@TCNJ.EDU]
Bob:
Do you know whether there are there any data how
recruiters view this degree? That is, How many of them get job?
June 5, 2008 reply from Bob Jensen
If WGU was a dead end on a career path and a graduate school path, it is
doubtful that it would continue to grow at these rates. Certainly it will do
better in some disciplines than other disciplines. The MBA and some K-12
teacher prospects are bleak at the moment for many programs these days but
accounting firms are hiring.
WGU had a drawn out battle for accreditation because it was so different.
But it achieved accreditation. It is now the only accredited
competency-based program in the United States.
Students should also be able to sit for the CPA examination in the states
that are supporting WGU. Online programs typically have greater problems
with dropout for a number of pretty well known reasons. Also education is
not ideal in the sense of socialization of the students vis-à-vis onsite
students.
WGU is apparently filling a need, and I think accounting recruiters will
hire good students from most any accredited programs that graduate students
who qualify to sit for the CPA examination. MBA programs have lost their
appeal in some respects as states tightened up requirements to sit for the
CPA examination.
Some online programs are graduating duds, but WGU is not one of these
programs. To the contrary, its competency-based grading makes WGU relatively
tough.
I like WGU because in didn't get out of the kitchen when it got hot both
in the snobbish academy and in state legislatures. It hung in there and
stayed true to its mission and standards. The same thing happened to the
competency based CASB in Canada which also hung in there as a graduate
school with high standards ---
http://www.casb.com/
My hat is off to both competency based WGU and the CASB.
Bob Jensen
Bob Jensen's threads on higher education controversies
are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm
What's Online Learning Really Like in a Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting
Class?
The Chronicle's Goldie Blumenstyk has covered distance education for
more than a decade, and during that time she's written stories about
the economics of for-profit education, the ways that online institutions
market themselves, and the demise of
the 50-percent rule. About the only thing she hadn't done, it seemed, was to
take a course from an online university. But this spring she finally took the
plunge, and now she has completed a class in government and nonprofit accounting
through the University of Phoenix. She shares tales from the cy ber-classroom --
and her final grade --
in a podcast with Paul Fain, a Chronicle reporter.
Chronicle of Higher Education, June 11, 2008 (Audio) ---
http://chronicle.com/media/audio/v54/i40/cyber_classroom/
-
All course materials (including textbooks) online;
No additional textbooks to purchase
-
$1,600 fee for the course and materials
-
Woman instructor with respectable academic
credentials and experience in course content
-
Instructor had good communications with students
and between students
-
Total of 14 quite dedicated online students in
course, most of whom were mature with full-time day jobs
-
30% of grade from team projects
-
Many unassigned online helper tutorials that were
not fully utilized by Goldie
-
Goldie earned a 92 (A-)
-
She gave a positive evaluation to the course and
would gladly take other courses if she had the time
-
She considered the course
to have a heavy workload
Jensen Added Comment
It wasn't mentioned, but I think Goldie took the ACC 460 course ---
Click Here
ACC 460 Government and Non-Profit Accounting
Course Description
This course covers fund accounting, budget and
control issues, revenue and expense recognition, and issues of reporting for
both government and non-profit entities.
Topics and Objectives
Environment of Government/Non-Profit Accounting
- Compare and contrast governmental and proprietary accounting.
- Analyze the relationship between GASB and FASB.
- Analyze the relationship between a budget and a Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR).
- Determine when and how to use the modified accrual accounting
method.
Fund Accounting Part I
- Distinguish between expenses and expenditures.
- Explain the effect of encumbrances on a budget.
- Apply the principles of fund accounting.
- Determine the closing process for the fund accounting cycle.
- Explain the reconciliation of government-wide financial statements
with the fund statements.
Fund Accounting Part II
- Apply accounting procedures for recognizing revenues and other
financial resources.
- Record interfund transfers.
- Prepare fund and non-governmental accounting entries.
- Prepare a financial statement for a governmental agency.
Overview of Not-for-Profit Accounting
- Examine the funds for different types of not-for-profit
organizations.
- Compare and contrast reporting by governmental, not-for-profit, and
proprietary organizations.
Current Issues in Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting
- Analyze current issues in government and not-for-profit accounting.
Bob Jensen's threads on asynchronous learning ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/255wp.htm
Bob Jensen's threads on distance