Still Pumping Out the Stuff

I don't know the old guy pictured above.

 I think this guy's more Cuil when searching for "Bob Jensen" --- http://www.cuil.com/info/

Bob Jensen's most recent photograph shown above appears under "sexy accountants" in David Albrecht's new accounting humor blog. He has the nerve to claim it really isn't a picture of me. I think he's jealous.

"Sexy Accounting–natural coupling or oxymoron?" The Summa:  Debits and credits of accounting professor David Albrecht, September 5, 2008 --- http://profalbrecht.wordpress.com/

In truth, I know one sexy accountant–Bob Jensen. Using a new search engine, Cuil (pronounced cool), I searched on “Bob Jensen Trinity”. The image to the right (above) is returned. No longer young in body, Bob never-the-less is in great condition. Being a professor for forty years seems to have kept him young. Retired, he now lives in the mountains of New Hampshire. Unfortunately, he looks nothing like the image at the right, and he never has! Cuil is cruel.

Over and out - -
David Albrecht

David wrote the following in a September 4, 2008 email message:

I currently live in NW Ohio.  It may sound wierd to many people, but I would like to move north to where there is more of a winter.

Dave Albrecht
Bowling Green
 


Jensen Comment
Beware of what you wish for David, because it might happen (the icicles are real) --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/tidbits/2008/tidbits080219.htm

The winds up here are real, but not quite as bad as those atop Mt. Washington when I am looking out at that mountain --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/tidbits/2007/tidbits071218.htm
But we do have winds on Sunset Hill that would lift me off the ground like Mary Poppins if I weighed half as much as I weigh now. My 222 lbs keep me on the ground most days.
You can almost feel the wind looking at one of the pictures here --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/tidbits/2008/tidbits080407.htm

And, sigh, when you’re enjoying your Ohio Azaleas in April we must wait up here until June.
Compare are our Azaleas in April versus June --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/tidbits/2008/tidbits080708.htm

I like where I live now, but then I’ve liked every single place where I’ve ever lived including:

·         An Iowa farm where I recall looking over a team of horses at oat bundles that nearly reached the horizon at harvest time --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/max01.htm  
 

·         A battleship at sea and a boarding house alongside the Iowa State University campus ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/tidbits/2007/tidbits070723.htm
 

·         A University of Denver coed dormitory (sadly not quite as coed in those days but we had a common lounge and dining hall)
 

·         An old Victorian Lodge on the Stanford campus (shared with 20 other graduate students)
It was called Manzanita Lodge and was covered with magenta Bouganvilla.
 

·         An old dairy farm in Michigan (with one cow named “Roast Beef”)
And there was a dumb basset hound named Andy who slept at the top of the stairs and, on occasion, fell down the stairs while turning around in the night.
 

·         A beach cottage on the ocean in Maine (I miss digging up those steamer clams)
Did you ever buy huge lobsters right off the boat and steam them on the beach at night with best friends three sheets to the wind by the time they sat down on the sand to eat like natives on a tropical island?
How To Eat Lobster --- http://www.gma.org/lobsters/eatingetc.html
 

·         An acreage with two horses on the outskirts of Tallahassee (I miss the smell of saddle leather soaked in sweat)
 

·         A lovely house in San Antonio and an elderly retired couple across the street who watched out the window almost daily and ordered us, five minutes after I got home from work, to get our butts over for happy hour (people are often more beautiful than mountains)
I do get lonesome for Texas swing music and dance halls big enough to have bull riding late at night --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=CMZaUwiv96M
 

·         A 140 year old cottage overlooking three mountain ranges to the east (White Mountains of New Hampshire) and one mountain range in west (Green Mountains of Vermont) --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/NHcottage/NHcottage.htm
Erika and I love walking down the road during a blizzard to have a beer and a hamburger in the cozy tavern of the Sunset Hill House Hotel. Memories are made of this.

And yes David, I could also be very happy Bowling Green, OH or Manhattan or Luckenbach, TX or San Antonio (although I’m no longer fond of hot and humid weather and city traffic). I’ve been blessed, because everywhere I relocated something or somebody always made me glad to be alive. I certainly hope that life is the same for each and every one of you on the AECM.

I’m certain that you would be a good neighbor with a great sense of humor David and a lot of enthusiasm for life. After my mother died in 1996, my father wanted to live on in his long-time home in Algona, Iowa. I was 1,200 miles due south at the time, but he had neighbors who made his life a wonderful until he passed on to the other side in 2001. He died happy and content in his sleep after watching (on television) the Patriots play football in a snowstorm.

How in the heck did I get off on this tangent?

 

 

 

Tidbits on September 9, 2008 (Early and Incomplete Draft)
Bob Jensen

For earlier editions of Tidbits go to http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TidbitsDirectory.htm
For earlier editions of New Bookmarks go to http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/bookurl.htm 

Click here to search Bob Jensen's web site if you have key words to enter --- Search Site.
For example if you want to know what Jensen documents have the term "Enron" enter the phrase Jensen AND Enron. Another search engine that covers Trinity and other universities is at http://www.searchedu.com/.


Bob Jensen's past presentations and lectures --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/resume.htm#Presentations   


Bob Jensen's Threads --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/threads.htm

Bob Jensen's Home Page is at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/

CPA Examination --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cpa_examination


Despite these noteworthy linguistic strides, the Academy presents Orwell 2008 to a college counselor who advises his clients to deliberately make mistakes on their applications so they "don’t sound like robots." After all, "if you fall into the trap of trying to do everything perfectly," without "typos" and other "creative errors," there's just "no spark left."
Fifteenth Annual Emperor's Awards, Guest commentary by Poor Elijah (Peter Berger), The Irascible Professor, August 19, 2008 --- http://irascibleprofessor.com/comments-08-19-08.htm
Jensen Comment
The same can be said for blogs and newsletters.

On May 14, 2006 I retired from Trinity University after a long and wonderful career as an accounting professor in four universities. I was generously granted "Emeritus" status by the Trustees of Trinity University. My wife and I now live in a cottage in the White Mountains of New Hampshire --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/NHcottage/NHcottage.htm

Bob Jensen's blogs and various threads on many topics --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/threads.htm
       (Also scroll down to the table at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ )

Global Incident Map --- http://www.globalincidentmap.com/home.php

Set up free conference calls at http://www.freeconference.com/
Also see http://www.yackpack.com/uc/   

U.S. Social Security Retirement Benefit Calculators --- http://www.socialsecurity.gov/estimator/
After 2017 what we would really like is a choice between our full social security benefits or 18 Euros each month --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Entitlements.htm

Free Online Tutorials in Multiple Disciplines --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials

Chronicle of Higher Education's 2008-2009 Almanac --- http://chronicle.com/free/almanac/2008/?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
Bob Jensen's threads on higher education controversies --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm
Bob Jensen's threads on economic and social statistics --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob1.htm#EconStatistics

World Clock --- http://www.peterussell.com/Odds/WorldClock.php

Tips on computer and networking security --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ecommerce/000start.htm

Many useful accounting sites (scroll down) --- http://www.iasplus.com/links/links.htm

If you want to help our badly injured troops, please check out
Valour-IT: Voice-Activated Laptops for Our Injured Troops  --- http://www.valour-it.blogspot.com/




Free Online Textbooks, Videos, and Tutorials --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Textbooks
Free Tutorials in Various Disciplines --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials
Edutainment and Learning Games --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/thetools.htm#Edutainment
Open Sharing Courses --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/updateee.htm#OKI




Online Video, Slide Shows, and Audio
In the past I've provided links to various types of music and video available free on the Web. 
I created a page that summarizes those various links --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm

Front Fell Off (two hilarious Aussie comedians) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=WcU4t6zRAKg
On August 19th 2007, an oil tanker off the coast of Australia split in two, dumping 20,000 tons of crude oil. Senator Collins, a member of the Australian Parliament, "supposedly" appeared on a TV news program to reassure the Australian public.

Japanese Illusionist --- http://images2.jokaroo.net/videos/grandpajapan.wmv

The Atlas of Early Printing (interactive slide show) --- http://atlas.lib.uiowa.edu/

Fun 2008Election Video --- http://www.peteyandpetunia.com/VoteHere/VoteHere.htm

50th Anniversary of NASA --- http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/50th/

NASA: Everest Expedition --- http://www.nasa.gov/astronauts/everest_expedition.html

Physics History Videos:  Physclips --- http://www.physclips.unsw.edu.au/

Video: National Geographic's Spore Documentary --- http://blog.wired.com/games/2008/09/video-national.html


Free music downloads --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/music.htm

Amazing Wine Glass Music (video) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=phqymc8anO0
Ode to Joy --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlk59xdM_YY&feature=rec-fresh

Cellist Haimovitz: Classic Bach, Classic Rock --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93587797

Glen Campbell: A Rhinestone Cowboy Returns --- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94237070

Bob Jensen listens to music free online (and no commercials) --- http://www.slacker.com/ 


Photographs and Art

The Friedman Archives (great photographs) --- http://www.friedmanarchives.com/

Two Men (slide show) --- http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/temp/TwoMen.pps

Charlie Parker (films in history) --- http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/

The Atlas of Early Printing (interactive slide show) --- http://atlas.lib.uiowa.edu/

MoMA: Kirchner and the Berlin Street (Art History Slide Show) --- http://moma.org/exhibitions/2008/kirchner/kirchner.html

Zaida Ben-Yusuf: New York Portrait Photographer --- http://www.npg.si.edu/exhibit/zaida/index.html

Portrait Gallery of Canada --- http://www.portraits.gc.ca/index-e.html

Portraits of Modern Japanese Historical Figures (Video) --- http://www.ndl.go.jp/portrait/e/index.html

1800s Map of Washington DC (from the University of Maryland) --- http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3285&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en

Iowa City Town and Campus Scenes Digital Collection --- http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm4/index_ictcs.php?CISOROOT=/ictcs

Buckaroos in Paradise: Ranching Culture in Northern Nevada, 1945-1982 --- http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/buckaroos/

NYPL Digital Library: Cigarette Cards: ABCs --- http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/explore/?collection=ABCsofCigaretteCards&col_id=161

The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) --- http://www.sfmoma.org/media/features/miller/

Guggenheim Museum: Louise Bourgeois --- http://www.guggenheim.org/exhibitions/exhibition_pages/bourgeois/index.html

Museum of Contemporary Photography --- http://www.mocp.org/

National Gallery of London --- http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/

Irish Museum of Modern Art --- http://www.modernart.ie/en/index.htm

Masters of Photography (video) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Xu4PNWkV4

Samurai Gallery --- http://horse.shrine.net/


Online Books, Poems, References, and Other Literature
In the past I've provided links to various types electronic literature available free on the Web. 
I created a page that summarizes those various links --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm

Edward Lear's Nonsense Poetry and Art --- http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/

Luke Surl's Comics and Creative Writing --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Banned

25 Banned Books That You Should Read Today --- http://degreedirectory.org/articles/25_Banned_Books_That_You_Should_Read_Today.html
Other banned books --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Banned
By the way, Snopes says that the purported book list that Sarah Palin banned is a false rumor --- http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp

Five Ways to Break Through Writer's Block --- http://www.wordclay.com/resources/WritersBlock.aspx

Writing Prompts --- http://www.writersdigest.com/WritingPrompts/

GoodQuotes.com --- http://www.goodquotes.com/answeringmachine.htm
The Quotations Archive --- http://www.aphids.com/quotes/
Other quotations finders --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Quotations

Free Online Textbooks, Videos, and Tutorials --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Textbooks
Free Tutorials in Various Disciplines --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials
Edutainment and Learning Games --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/thetools.htm#Edutainment
Open Sharing Courses --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/updateee.htm#OKI




Vice-President Cheney is even more hated (if that's possible) than President Bush with respect to the Iraq War and the commitment of ever increasing U.S. troop strength in Iraq. In his latest book, Bob Woodward reveals that Cheney was left completely out of the loop with respect to decisions made to send in 30,000 additional troops and to replace General Casey with General Petraeus. Why? Because Bush knew that both Cheney and the Pentagon would oppose these decisions. Woodward also reveals a top secret weapon that, more than anything else, is making the Surge work.
Watch the video of Bob Woodward ---http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/60minutes/main4415771.shtml 

No matter how you feel about Sarah Palin as a candidate, it’s fun to watch the Congress and the media squirm. What liberal reporters and correspondents have just made public apologies about their negative remarks about Gov. Palin?

Broken Promises and Pork Binges
The Democratic majority came to power in January promising to do a better job on earmarks. They appeared to preserve our reforms and even take them a bit further. I commended Democrats publicly for this action. Unfortunately, the leadership reversed course. Desperate to advance their agenda, they began trading earmarks for votes, dangling taxpayer-funded goodies in front of wavering members to win their support for leadership priorities.

John Boehner, "Pork Barrel Stonewall," The Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2007 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119085546436140827.html

Sarah Palin has put the flim-flam nature of America feminism sharply into focus, revealing the not-so-secret hypocrisy of its code and, whatever her future, this alone is an accomplishment. As she emerged into the nation's consciousness, a shudder went through the feminist left—a political movement not restricted to females. She is a mother refusing to stay at home (good) who had made a success out in the workplace (excellent) whose marriage nevertheless is a rip-roaring success and whose views are unspeakable—those of a red-blooded, right-wing principled pragmatist.
Barbara Amiel, "What Mrs. Palin Could Learn From Mrs. T, The Wall Street Journal, September 5, 2008; Page A15 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122057410046101771.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

There is nothing more dangerous to entrenched Washington power than a populist conservative who looks unlikely to buy into Washington's creature comforts. Take a close look at Governor Palin's record on ethics and energy in Alaska, and it becomes clear what this Beltway outburst is actually about. The irony is that while Senator Obama is running on change, his acceptance speech made explicit that he's promising only more power and money for Washington. Sarah Palin's history of taking on the career politicians of a corrupt Alaskan GOP machine -- her own party -- shows that she's the more authentic change agent.
"The Beltway Boys," The Wall Street Journal, September 3, 2008; Page A22 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122039719000892745.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Jensen Comment
The fear of Palin is bipartisan on the Beltway.

She has the power of the normal. Hillary Clinton is grim, stentorian, was born to politics and its connivances. Nancy Pelosi, another mother of five, often seems dazed and ad hoc. But this state governor and mother of a big family is a woman in a good mood. There is something so normal about her, so "You've met this person before and you like her," that she broke through in a new way, as a character vividly herself, and vividly genuine.  . . . She seemed wholly different from, and in fact seemed a refutation to, all the men of Washington at their great desks who make rules others have to live by but they don't have to live by themselves, who mandate work rules from which they exempt Congress, for instance. They don't live by the rules they espouse. She has lived her expressed values. She said yes to a Down Syndrome child. This too is powerful . . . Her flaws accentuated her virtues. Now and then this happens in politics, but it's rare. An example: The very averageness of her voice, the not-wonderfulness of it, highlighted her normality: most people don't have great voices. That normality in turn highlighted the courage she showed in being there, on that stage for the first time in her life and under trying circumstances. Her averageness accentuated her specialness. Her commonality highlighted her uniqueness.
Peggy Noonan, "'A Servant's Heart'," The Wall Street Journal, September 6, 2008 4:48 p.m.; Page A11 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122059352189503479.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Jensen Comment
I suspect in the end that the liberal media and the self-serving intellectuals of academe who live by government grants will destroy Sarah Palin, but for her short 15 minutes of fame, isn't it grand to see NBC, Jon Stewart, Keith Olbermann, Newsweek, and the New York Times squirm in their biases and hypocrisy?  Sure she accepted the earmarks dangling in front of her for the benefit of her constituency. But so did Senator Obama accept earmarks for his constituency. Nancy Pelosi let earmarks soar after she had the power to curtail this corruption. Do Jon and Keith ever poke fun at the scars on Pelosi's ears?

If you've ever seen a lady with a bee in her bonnet, and all the crazy contortions she'll make to get the darned thing out before it stings her lovely head, you'll understand precisely why the Democrats are taking such crude swats at Governor Sarah Palin. . . . So, what's clearly at the bottom of all the Democrat angst over Governor Sarah Palin? She's not their kind of ordinary, good-old-wink-and-nod party pol. She'll be a bee in the bonnet of every pork-laden, greedy D.C. insider the same way she has been in Alaska. I sincerely doubt that there's a good ole boy or gal this side of hell who isn't squirming, swatting and contorting every which-way to take her out before her potent stinger lands in Washington next January. McCain and Palin are two reformers on the move.
Kyle-Anne Shiver, "Why Palin Is a Bee in Dems' Bonnets," American Thinker, September 1, 2008 ---
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/why_palin_is_a_bee_in_dems_bon.html

The Palin pick already, as Noemie Emery wrote, “Wipes out the image of McCain as the crotchety elder and brings back that of the fly-boy and gambler, which is much more appealing, and the genuine person.” But of course McCain needs Palin to do well to prove he’s a shrewd and prescient gambler. I spent an afternoon with Palin a little over a year ago in Juneau, and have followed her career pretty closely ever since. I think she can pull it off. I’m not the only one. The day after the V.P. announcement, I spoke with an old friend, James Muller, chairman of the political science department at the University of Alaska, Anchorage. He said that Palin “has been underestimated over and over again. She took on the party and state establishments here in Alaska, and left them reeling. She’s a very good campaigner, a quick study and a fighter.” Muller called particular attention to her successes in passing an increase to the oil production tax and facilitating the future construction of a huge natural gas pipeline. “At first the oil companies thought she was naïve, and they’d have their way. Instead she faced them down and forced them to compromise on her terms.” Can she face down the Democrats, Joe Biden and the national media over the next couple of months? John McCain is betting she can. Perhaps, as he pondered his vice-presidential selection, he recalled the advice of Margaret Thatcher: “In politics if you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman.”
William Kristol, "A Star Is Born?" The New York Times, September 1, 2008 --- Click Here
Jensen Comment
This was surprising to me in that it was printed in the GOP-hating NYT.

You want to look like a maverick and like you think outside the box? Pick a woman for a running mate. You want to look good to the evangelicals? Choose a running mate with a Down syndrome child . . . Fisherman, sportswoman, hunter. Speaks truth to power in a state corrupted by oil. Has a son headed to Iraq. A woman who made the decision to carry to term a baby she knew to be developmentally disabled. She makes John McCain, Naval Academy graduate, fighter pilot and prisoner of war, look like just another grouchy, old, rich white guy . . . If you are going to pick a woman for the sake of picking a woman, can you at least make it a credible choice? Can you at least make a choice that doesn't give the gag writers for Jay Leno and Jon Stewart the month off? (The jokes started immediately: She won't be able to hold her own against Joe Biden in a vice presidential debate. But wait until the swimsuit portion of the competition.)
Susan Reimer
, The Baltimore Sun,  September 1, 2008 --- http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.reimer01sep01,0,1829342.column

Susan Reimer was shocked to find that her substance free, lie filled attack on John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin generated “More than 8,200  9,159 comments were posted to the column on The Baltimore Sun’s Web site. I received more than 700 personal e-mails and about 50 phone calls.” Even worse for Reimer, her gutter scraping column was read by Rush Limbaugh and Brit Hume and was linked by Drudge as an example of the outrageous treatment that Palin has gotten at the hands of feminist media elites like Reimer. Oh, the humanity!
Werner Todd Huston, "Baltimore Sun Columnist Whines Readers Being Mean to Her," Public Forum, September 6, 2008 --- http://conservablogs.com/publiusforum/2008/09/06/palin-smearing-baltimore-sun-columnist-whines-readers-being-mean-to-her/

An apology? Not really.
The things that were said about me
(replies to her attack on Sarah Palin), my personal appearance and my children - as well as Barack Obama - were beyond the bounds of decency, and many were said in language that might only be seen in a bathroom stall. Generally, the comments were not made behind the veil of anonymity the Internet can provide. The writers signed their names. And they revealed what I think has become the bare-knuckles nature of our national conversation. So much pent-up anger, so much barely concealed hate was released in those e-mails and those postings. I wonder where next they will find a vent. It is still two months until the presidential election. Things could get really rough out there.
Susan Reimer, "Gloves came off when column came out," The Baltimore Sun,  September 5, 2008 --- http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.reimer05sep05,0,3664358.column
Reamer gets reamed by her readers --- http://www.topix.net/forum/source/baltimore-sun/T4I0OVJRSID6BK8GM

. . . (NBC's Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea) Mitchell who said that only uneducated, female voters will be drawn to Sarah Palin, not those smart, college educated ones. At about 5:57 into this clip Andrea Mitchell was brought onto Meet the Press with Goodwin, David Gregory and host Tom Brokaw to tell us all that Sarah Palin will only appeal to uneducated women, not educated ones. At about 5:57 into this clip Andrea Mitchell was brought onto Meet the Press with Goodwin, David Gregory and host Tom Brokaw to tell us all that Sarah Palin will only appeal to uneducated women, not educated ones.
Newsbusters, August 31, 2008 --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2072189/posts

Say what?
"Andrea Mitchell Changes Mind, Now Thinks Palin a Good VP Pick," by Noel Shepard, Newsbusters, September 7, 2008 ---
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/09/07/andrea-mitchell-changes-mind-now-thinks-palin-good-vp-pick

Sally Quinn (Washington Post Reporter) belittles Sarah Palin --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=o24Y_6HWLCY

Say What?
Sally Quinn Apologizes for Sarah Palin Remarks (Video apology) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=9FEANF9dR_8
Jensen Comment
I admire Ms Mitchell and Ms Quinn for apologizing. You would never catch Susan Reimer or Jon Stewart or Keith Olbermann apologizing. I take that back. Keith Olbermann did apologize for his graphic 9/11 tribute played in the lead-up to John McCain's acceptance of the nomination --- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/05/keith-olbermann-apologize_n_124179.html 
And when I did a Google search on the phrase "Keith Olbermann aplogizes" I came up with hundreds of hits. Thanks Keith. And I got hundreds of others when I searched for "Jon Stewart apologizes," so I guess it just goes to show that the left wing TV comedians aren't all bad. Rush Limbaugh on occasion has apologized, but not nearly as often as Olbermann and Stewart. Bill O'Reilly, however, is the most apologetic of them all. Just goes to show you that fair play is equal opportunity.

Is The New York Times is apologizing for a Palin Smear? --- http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2008/09/nyt_issues_retraction.html
Oops! No the NYT is not apologizing! The NYT's reporter "is completely confident in the word of a single source who has since retracted her claims? What kind of operation are the editors at the Times running?" asks Michael Goldfarb.

Ms Winfrey is by far the world’s best-paid television entertainer, earning an estimated $295 million in the year to June 2007, dwarfing the second-ranking Jerry Seinfeld, on $68 million, according to Forbes magazine. Simon Cowell, a creator and judge of American Idol, the US version of Pop Idol, came third with $51 million.
London Times, October 10, 2007 --- http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article2626198.ece

Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. "Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider explains. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama." One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash! It is not clear if Oprah has softened her position after watching Palin's historic convention speech. Last year, Winfrey blocked an appearance by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, timed to a promotional tour of his autobiography. Oprah and executive producer Sheri Salata, who has contributed thousands of dollars to Obama's campaign, refused requests for comment.
Drudge Report, September 5, 2008 --- http://drudgereport.com/flash3os.htm
For nearly $1 billion, Oprah sold her cable network to MSNBC --- http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article2626198.ece
Campaigning for Obama (Part 1) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=_QJJOtT32C0
Campaigning for Obama (Part 2) ---http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=iTCWgljr8tY
Campaigning for Obama (Part 3) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=HcUr2kCIJpQ
Campaigning for Obama (Part 4) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=VfzFmYoZajY
Campaigning for Obama (Part 5) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=OrOpKOrQDsk
Campaigning for Obama (Part 6) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=o9avjiNW_G4
Campaigning for Obama (Part 7) --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=renZsrXqvBc
Campaigning for Obama (Part 8) ---http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=FkpYyaKPaNE
Women for Obama --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=zmPOJDOays4
Thank You Oprah --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=oCyybJ3k2iI

There is another question though which essentially I’ve heard expressed here many times today and from calls elsewhere, and that is the decision made by Sarah Palin herself, when knowing her daughter’s condition, by accepting John McCain’s offer she guaranteed that her daughter would be known globally as the best known 17-year-old unwed teenager in the world, and that decision many people question. I mean, Republicans, it’s not a partisan question. It’s just a question of whether in fact family values, and whether family values collide in this case. All candidates – David and I have talked about this – have healthy if not overly healthy ambitions. But there had to be some tension here. The ambition of going on a national ticket, and her love and consideration of her daughter, being known once and for all as ‘Aren’t you the daughter who was pregnant of the vice presidential candidate in 2008?
Mark Shields as quoted by Tim Graham, "PBS's Shields Slams Palin for Choosing Ambition Over Her Daughter," Newsbusters, September 2, 2008 --- http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/09/02/pbss-shields-slams-palin-choosing-ambition-over-her-daughter

Whoopi’s article concluded by suggesting Gov. Palin's speech reminded her of a German-American Nazi rally: "This girl (Palin) is dangerous to me. This is a very dangerous woman, because I believe for her intents and purposes, she’s OK if everybody lives a certain way, that is to say, the way God ordained men and women to be. Well, already she’s breaking that because she’s the daddy. She’s going to run the country and the husband is going to take care of the kids. I just,
Tim Graham, "Whoopi Goldberg: Palin Sounds Pro-Nazi: Wants to 'Succeed' From U.S. Newsbusters, September 2, 2008 ---
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/09/05/whoopi-goldberg-palin-sounds-pro-nazi-wants-succeed-u-s 

The big photo of Sarah on CNN shows her as Nazi? --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2074375/posts

Speaking at the fundraiser, Mrs. Obama insinuated that she doesn't think Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is very bright.
Michael Bates, "Michelle Obama disses Palin, promises gay adoption rights," Batesline, September 6, 2008 ---
http://www.batesline.com/archives/2008/09/michelle-obama-speaks-to-lgbt-re.html

Sarah Palin is really just a Barbie doll --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=JQGYchgLYdU
She just would not understand how to cripple the U.S. Military --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=dl32Y7wDVDs

Snopes Sets Some Palin Politically Correct Rumors Straight

"Anger at fake Sarah Palin photos as smear campaign makes her 'look like a stripper' "  --- Click Here

"The Media loves to hate Sarah Palin," by Howie Carr, Boston Herald, September 7, 2008 --- Click Here

She admits smoking pot as a teenager, which sets a terrible example for the youth of America, unlike Barack Obama, who admits smoking pot as a teenager, and whose “refreshing candor” is a breath of fresh air after eight years of Cheney-Bush.

She went to multiple colleges as an undergraduate, which shows how flighty and immature she is, unlike Barack Obama, who went to multiple colleges as an undergraduate, which shows the inquisitive nature of his intelligence, which has been such an inspiration, at least to everyone who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

She has been known to put out a flag - an American flag, of all things - on the Fourth of July.

The pregnancy and impending shotgun marriage of her teen daughter, Bristol, sets a terrible example for the youth of America, unlike the pregnancy of the teen movie character “Juno,” who sets a wonderful example for the youth of America by refusing to marry.

Sarah Palin is so stupid that on Friday she called the Penn State football team the “Nittaly Lions” - oh wait, scratch that, that was Barack Obama, who again proved his intellect by showing he has much weightier issues on his mind than college football. And who even cares about Penn State anyway, it’s not an Ivy League school.

She’s a member of the Alaska Independence Party - correction, she isn’t, it was The New York Times [NYT] that printed the flat-out lie that she was, in a story that, so said the Times, “called into question how thoroughly Mr. McCain had examined her background.”

You must understand printing lies about Republican candidates is OK. It’s called “vetting.” Printing the truth about liberals - that’s called “swift-boating.” From career MSNBC jock sniffer Keith Olbermann to Barney Frank’s favorite publisher Jann Wenner, the verdict on Palin is unanimous.

The naysayers run the gamut of the political spectrum, from A to B. Sarah is a heretic on everything they gullibly believe in, most significantly global warming. For that blasphemy alone the PC Inquistion insists on the traditional penalty: She must be burned at the stake!

Twelve years ago, she considered banning books at the Wasilla Public Library, which is a chilling assault on the First Amendment, unlike Barack Obama, whose campaign 12 days ago tried to shout down an appearance on Chicago radio of an investigative reporter looking into ties between Barack and rabid terrorist Bill Ayers. But that mob of Barack brownshirts besieging WGN can in no way be compared to what Palin did because well, uh, um, it just can’t be, if you know what’s good for you.

Jensen Comment
Snopes says that the purported book list that Sarah Palin banned is a false rumor ---
http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp

Faced with the Sarah Palin phenomenon, Wenner's (publisher of the Rolling Stones Magazine) liberal politics seem to have kicked into gear. While other celebrity-fixated magazines such as OK! cooed over the new Republican vice-presidential candidate, US Weekly devoted page after page to her teenage daughter's pregnancy, allegations over her conduct in office, as well as "new embarrassing surprises". However, the mass exodus of subscribers following the issue's launch seems
The First Post, Sepbember 5, 2008 --- http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/people,1350,jann-wenner-slips-up-with-sarah-palin-attack,43521

Andrea Mrozek, "The New Face of Feminism," Canada's National Post, September 3, 2008 --- http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=764723 

Note that The Guardian is a liberal magazine even by U.K standards
"When Barack's berserkers lost the plot," by Nick Cohen, The Guardian, September 7, 2008 --- http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/07/uselections2008.republicans2008

My colleagues in the American liberal press had little to fear at the start of the week. Their charismatic candidate was ahead in virtually every poll. George W Bush was so unpopular that conservatives were scrambling around for reasons not to invite the Republican President to the Republican convention. Democrats had only to maintain their composure and the White House would be theirs. During the 1997 British general election, the late Lord Jenkins said that Tony Blair was like a man walking down a shiny corridor carrying a precious vase. He was the favourite and held his fate in his hands. If he could just reach the end of the hall without a slip, a Labour victory was assured. The same could have been said of the American Democrats last week. But instead of protecting their precious advantage, they succumbed to a spasm of hatred and threw the vase, the crockery, the cutlery and the kitchen sink at an obscure politician from Alaska.

For once, the postmodern theories so many of them were taught at university are a help to the rest of us. As a Christian, conservative anti-abortionist who proved her support for the Iraq War by sending her son to fight in it, Sarah Palin was 'the other' - the threatening alien presence they defined themselves against. They might have soberly examined her reputation as an opponent of political corruption to see if she was truly the reformer she claimed to be. They might have gently mocked her idiotic creationism, while carefully avoiding all discussion of the racist conspiracy theories of Barack Obama's church.

But instead of following a measured strategy, they went berserk. On the one hand, the media treated her as a sex object. The New York Times led the way in painting Palin as a glamour-puss in go-go boots you were more likely to find in an Anchorage lap-dancing club than the Alaska governor's office.

On the other, liberal journalists turned her family into an object of sexual disgust: inbred rednecks who had stumbled out of Deliverance. Palin was meant to be pretending that a handicapped baby girl was her child when really it was her wanton teenage daughter's. When that turned out to be a lie, the media replaced it with prurient coverage of her teenage daughter, who was, after all, pregnant, even though her mother was not going to do a quick handover at the maternity ward and act as if the child was hers.

Hatred is the most powerful emotion in politics. At present, American liberals are not fighting for an Obama presidency. I suspect that most have only the haziest idea of what it would mean for their country. The slogans that move their hearts and stir their souls are directed against their enemies: Bush, the neo-cons, the religious right.

In this, American liberals are no different from the politically committed the world over. David Cameron knew that he would never be Prime Minister until he had killed the urgent hatred of the Conservative party in liberal England. A measure of his success is that hardly anyone now is caught up by the once ubiquitous feeling that no compromise is too great if it stops the Tories regaining power. Hate can sell better than hope.

When a hate campaign goes wrong, however, disaster follows. And everything that could go wrong with the campaign against Palin did. American liberals forgot that the public did not know her. By the time she spoke at the Republican convention, journalists had so lowered expectations that a run-of-the-mill speech would have been enough to win the evening.

As it was, her family appeared on stage without a goitre or a club foot between them, and Palin made a fighting speech that appealed over the heads of reporters to the public we claim to represent. 'I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion,' she said as she deftly detached journalists from their readers and viewers. 'I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country.'

English leftists made the same mistake of allowing their hatred to override their judgment after the Iraq war. If they had confined themselves to charging Tony Blair with failing to find the weapons of mass destruction he promised were in Iraq, and sending British troops into a quagmire, they might have forced him out. They were so consumed by loathing, however, they insisted that he had lied, which he clearly had not. They set the bar too low and Blair jumped it with ease. 'When a man believes that any stick will do, he at once picks up a boomerang,' said GK Chesterton, and when the politically committed go on a berserker you should listen for the sound of their own principles smacking them in the face.

Journalists who believe in women's equality should not spread sexual smears about a candidate, or snigger at her teenage daughter's pregnancy, or declare that a mother with a young family cannot hold down a responsible job for the pragmatic reason that they will look like gross hypocrites if they do. Before Palin, we saw hypocrisy of the right when shock jocks who had spent years denouncing feminism came over all politically correct when Bill Clinton had an affair with Monica Lewinsky.

In Britain, the most snobbish attacks on Margaret Thatcher did not come from aristocrats but from the communist historian Eric Hobsbawm, who opined that Thatcherism was the 'anarchism of the lower middle classes' and the liberal Jonathan Miller, who deplored her 'odious suburban gentility'. More recently, George Osborne, of the supposedly compassionate Conservative party, revealed himself to be a playground bully when he derided Gordon Brown for being 'faintly autistic'.

In an age when politics is choreographed, voters watch out for the moments when the public-relations facade breaks down and venom pours through the cracks. Their judgment is rarely favourable when it does. Barack Obama knows it. All last week, he was warning American liberals to stay away from the Palin family. He understands better than his supporters that it is not a politician's enemies who lose elections, but his friends.

But it ain't about how hard you hit.
It's about how hard you can get hit and keep movin' forward.
It's about how much you can take and keep movin' forward.
That's how winning is done!

From Rocky --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=V1tXhJniSEc
Jim Carey's version --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=7O5Wu948TH4

In her speech last week, Palin gave a little jab back at "all those reporters and commentators." That won't likely win her many new admirers in the Washington press corps.
Brian M. Carney, "Political Diary," The Wall Street Journal, September 7, 2008 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122073072955107155.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

Nor should this blitz against the news media from the right be dismissed as simply glib and tired lines from the old Republican playbook. “The mainstream media, which has been holding endless symposia here on the future of media in the 21st century, is in danger of missing a central fact of that future,” wrote Peggy Noonan, the Wall Street Journal columnist and former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan. “If they appear, once again, as they have in the past, to be people not reporting the battle but engaged in the battle, if they allow themselves to be tagged by that old tag, which so tarnished them in the past, they will do more to imperil their own future than the Internet has.”
Mark Leibovich, "Who, Us?" The New York Times, September 7, 2008 ---
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/weekinreview/07leibovich.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Tensions are running high at MSNBC, at least surrounding veteran host Joe Scarborough who seems to be increasingly discontented at his network's decision to market itself as the cable net of choice for Bush haters. That hasn't sat well with the likes of the far left (Surge-hating and Bush-hating) Keith Olbermann who has played a large role in getting MSNBC to pursue this strategy The Democratic convention seems to have only exacerbated those tensions. Last night saw Olbermann caught on an open mic blurting out profane disgust at Scarborough, prompting the latter to verbally call him out while fellow MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews . . .
Newsbusters, August 25, 2008 --- http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/scarborough-mocks-shuster-msnbc-for-no-bias-claims.html
Watch the video --- http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/26/keith-olbermann-caught-dissing-joe-scarborough-open-mic
Also see the video --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=447YeVdqspE

Researchers have determined the secret to a fly's evasive maneuvering from a looming swatter by using high-resolution, high-speed digital imaging.
"Caltech Scientists Discover Why Flies Are so Hard to Swat." Converge Magazine, September 2, 2008 ---
http://www.convergemag.com/story.php?catid=421&storyid=107787
Jensen Comment
Homeland Security would like to remotely send what flies see back to the CIA and FBI. The problem to date is that the flies seem to prefer honing in on horse butts  and Keith Olbermann rather than terrorists making bombs.

At a forum on Sunday, when Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell called MSNBC "the official network of the Obama campaign," Brokaw said, "I think Keith has gone too far. I think Chris has gone too far." Insiders say Olbermann is pushing to have Brokaw banned from the network and is also refusing to have centrist Time magazine columnist Mike Murphy on his show.
P.J. Gladnik quoting from the New York Post, Newsbusters, August 27, 2008 ---
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/27/keith-olbermann-trying-banish-tom-brokaw-msnbc
The Bad News Bush Videos on NBC --- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#26567218
     Also see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/
The Good News Bush Videos on NBC --- You've got to be kidding

Did major international media, including wire services Reuters and The Associated Press, clumsily help spread pro-Georgian propaganda during the recent war with Russia? Perhaps so, based on possibly staged photos by Reuters photogs David Mdzinarishvili and Gleb Garanich, and George Abdaladze, an Reuters AP shooter. Several blogs, most notably Byzantine Blog, have highlighted some, ahem, curious details in a series of photos claiming to portray civilian casualties of Russian attacks on the town of Gori. Danger Room pal Bryan William Jones, himself a photographer, brought our attention to this. On his own he noticed details in several pics that he says "made me sit up and say WTF?" One series of photos from Gori might show bodies changing location and poses, while one photogenic Georgian man appears in several different photo series, shot by different photogs, "grieving" for the dead ... apparently without ever looking at the camera being shoved in his face.The photos are especially suspect when compared to clearly real snapshots from the conflict, Jones points out.
David Axe, "Possibly Staged Pics Fueled Georgian Propaganda Push (Updated, Corrected and Bumped)," Danger Room, September 5, 2008 --- http://blog.wired.com/defense/

Rick Perlstein, the author of the recent "Nixonland" -- an 896-page argument that Nixon's malign influence on postwar American politics reflected the malignity of his own soul -- has now edited "Richard Nixon: Speeches, Writings, Documents." It is the latest in the James Madison Library in American Politics, of which Sean Wilentz, the eminent Princeton professor, is the general editor. The idea of collecting the 37th president's miscellaneous prose is excellent and overdue. Some of Nixon's most important writings -- for instance, 1967's "Asia After Viet Nam," where he first advanced the idea of bringing Red China in from the cold -- have been unavailable for a long time or hard to find. In a general editor's introduction, Mr. Wilentz states that this collection will be "the autobiography [Nixon] did not write" -- which is awkward because Mr. Perlstein's first selection is from "RN" (1978), the 1,038-page autobiography Mr. Nixon did write . . . A much more shrewd and realistic portrayal of Nixon can be found in Conrad Black's "Richard M. Nixon: A Life in Full." As in his 2003 biography of FDR, Lord Black combines a mastery of his material with elegant (if occasionally overreaching) prose; and he brings a worldly outlook and sophisticated analysis to his subject. He admires Nixon's accomplishments, but his book is hardly hagiography.
Frank Gannon, "Finally Getting to Know Him," The Wall Street Journal, August 28, 2008, Page A15 --- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121996708293781533.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

The United Nations has long been an enabler of Burma's tyrannical leaders. Last week it reached a new low. Ibrahim Gambari, the U.N.'s special envoy to Burma, spent six days in the country, meeting almost exclusively with government ministers and government-backed "political parties" to discuss the junta's "road map to democracy," under which "elections" will be held in 2010. As during prior trips, the junta rejected Mr. Gambari's offer of U.N. election monitors for 2010. The fact that Mr. Gambari is focusing on the next sham election instead of the current lack of political freedoms is a diplomatic victory for the generals. The ruling junta has already ignored international criticism for its crackdown on peaceful demonstrators last year and its mishandling of Cyclone Nargis, which killed 85,000 in May.
"U.N. ♥ Burma's Generals -- II," The Wall Street Journal, August 28, 2008 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121986623375877133.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

Only a united Europe could stop Russia from cutting bilateral deals that are advantageous for individual countries but disastrous for the EU as a whole. Only a united Europe could hold Gazprom accountable to transparency and competition rules, stopping the firm from dictating its terms and playing one EU country against the other. The EU correctly points out that Russia needs European energy consumers just as much as Europe needs Russian energy suppliers. Moscow, though, has managed to turn this mutual dependence into one-sided leverage. It's time to reverse this trend. Ultimately, it all comes down to political will in Western Europe -- and the longer Russian tanks remain in Georgia, the clearer it becomes that such will is lacking.
Zeyno Baran, "A Bear Energy Market," The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2008 ---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121970256946770749.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

I came across this interesting speech by CFTC Commissioner, Bart Chillton. In this speech he gives three loopholes exploited by future market traders - Enron loophole, London loophole and Swaps loophole. Basically all have a similar theme- one market is regulated and other is not and both have near similar products. The regulators can only watch the former and the traders switch and build volumes in the latter. This is actually problematic as because of innovation, one can create similar instruments in another exchange and build up positions (he explains that is what Amaranth traders did). Now what should a regulator do? He says we need more cooperation between regulators.
Amol Agrawal, Mostly Economics, September 1, 2008 --- http://mostlyeconomics.wordpress.com/

What began as a team project they proposed during the 2007 Institute has turned into Enhanced Vehicle Acoustics, a San Francisco Bay Area-based business that has developed technology to transform nearly soundless hybrid cars into vehicles that pedestrians can hear. Meyer, who holds an MD and PhD in immunology from Stanford, told 2008 institute participants on July 10 about the challenges he sees for his new firm. Enhanced Vehicle Acoustics also involves Bai and a third key player, Brook Reeder, another ’07 Institute participant who holds a master’s degree from the Stanford Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics. “The spirit of this course is learning by trial and error and then pushing forward,” said Meyer. “We’ve had a lot of good advice.” The four-week business management program is designed for graduate students from non-business fields who have dreamed up a good idea for a company. There are 72 people attending the 2008 Institute, 66 of them from Stanford.
Michele Chandler, "Young Inventors Make Hybrid Cars Noisier," Stanford GSB News, July 2008 --- http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/headlines/hybrid_7_08.html
Jensen Comment
Why not just broadcast a recording of an 18-wheeler? I seriously tried this in an effort to keep armadillos from digging up my back yard in San Antonio. But it didn't work. The armadillos ignored my recordings altogether and continued to uproot my lawn on a nightly basis. I then tried to trap them, but they're wary of traps. I figured if I shot them with my 22-cal. pistol, the bullets would just bounce off their armor plating. I guess this is why they've survived since prehistoric times. They survived very well in my back yard.




This film, really isn't for anybody other than the (Obama) choir. But that's because I believe the choir needs a song to sing every now and then.
Michael Moore
Jensen Comment
Is the price just too high for Michael Moore's new film?
"Michael Moore to release new film online for free," by Jake Coyle, The Washington Post, September 5, 2008 --- Click Here
"Slacker Uprising" --- http://www.michaelmoore.com/
Impeach the President*** | Call Your Congressperson | Sign the Petition | Impeach Him in the Streets (VIDEO) --- http://www.michaelmoore.com/
Question
Is Michael Moore's pacifist/populist activism support of Obama and Biden hurting them more than helping them?
Possibly, because liberal populists already intend to vote for Obama and Biden, whereas others are turned off by Moore's self-serving promotions of himself.
Witness how the Obama Campaign distances itself from Moore and other pacifist activists. Smart move on Senator Obama's part.
No Michael, even the millions dollars you're spending for Obama and Biden won't get you invited to the Inaugural Ball.

The Liberal Skew in Hollywood --- http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw

"Why Is Hollywood Dominated by Liberals?" by Richard Posner, The Becker-Posner Blog, August 24, 2008 --- http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/

A recent article in the Washington Times by Amy Fagan, entitled “Hollywood’s Conservative Underground, www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/23/hollywoods-conservative-underground/  (visited Aug. 23, 2008), is a reminder of the curious domination of the American film industry by left liberals. The industry’s left-wing slant drives the Right crazy (if you Google "Hollywood Liberals," you'll encounter an endless number of fierce, often paranoid, denunciations by conservative bloggers and journalists of Hollywood's control by the Left). Fagan's article depicts Hollywood conservatives as an embattled minority, forced to meet in secret lest the revelation of their political views lead to their being blacklisted by the industry. The conservatives' complaint is an ironic echo of the 1950s, when communists and fellow travelers in Hollywood--who were numerous--were blacklisted by the movie studios.

We need to distinguish between actors, actresses, set designers, scriptwriters, directors, and other "creative" (that is, artistic) film personnel, on the one hand, and the business executives and shareholders of the film studios, on the other hand. (Producers are closer to the second, the business, echelon than to the creative echelon.) The creative workers, I think, are not so much magnetized by left-wing politics as drawn to political extremes--for there have been a number of extremely conservative Hollywood actors, such as Ronald Reagan, John Wayne, Charlton Heston, Mel Gibson, and Jon Voight--Voight recently wrote a fiercely conservative op-ed in the Washington Times, where Fagan's article was published. The left end of the political spectrum in this country is still somewhat more respectable than the right end, and so if one finds a class of persons who are drawn to political polarization, more will end up at the far liberal end of the political spectrum than at the far conservative end, yet it will be polarization rather than leftism as such that explains the imbalance. No one has a good word for Stalin and Mao nowadays, but socialism is not a dirty word, as fascism is.

But why should actors and other creative workers in the Hollywood film industry, and indeed "cultural workers" more generally, be drawn to political extremes? The nature of their work, which combines irregular employment with high variance in income, an engagement with imaginative rather than realistic concepts, noninvolvement in the production of "useful" goods or service, and, traditionally, a bohemian style of living (a consequence of the other factors I have mentioned), distances them from the ordinary, everyday world of work and family in a basically rather conservative, philistine, and emphatically commercial society, which is the society of the United States today.

The choice of a political ideology, which is to say of a general orientation that guides a person's response to a variety of specific political and ethical issues, is less a matter of conscious choice or weighing of evidence than of a feeling of comfort with the advocates and adherents of the ideology. An ideology attractive to solid bourgeois types is unlikely to be attractive to cultural workers as I have described them. So we should not expect those workers to subscribe to the conventional political values, and apparently a disproportionate number of them do not. Moreover, though most actors and other creative film workers are not particularly intellectual, as cultural producers much in the public eye they have a natural affinity with public intellectuals, who I found in my book Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline (2001) split about 2/3 liberal 1/3 conservative.

The situation of Hollywood's business executives, including investors in the film business, is different. They are not cultural workers, and one expects their focus to be firmly on the bottom line. It is true that the Hollywood film industry was founded largely by Jews and has always been very heavily Jewish, and that Jews of all income levels are disproportionately liberal. But if Hollywood based its selection of movies to produce and sell on the political views of the studios' owners and managers, that would be commercial suicide, as competitors would rush in to cater to audiences' desires. The idea that Hollywood is a propaganda machine for the Left is not only improbable as theory but empirically unsupported. Hollywood produces antiwar movies during unpopular wars and pro-war movies during popular ones (as during World War II), movies that ridicule minorities when minorities are unpopular and movies that flatter them when discrimination becomes unfashionable, movies that steer away from frank presentation of sex when society is strait-laced and movies that revel in sex when the society, or at least the part of the society that consumes films avidly, society turns libertine. The Hollywood film industry follows taste rather than creating taste, as one expects business firms to do.

What troubles conservatives about Hollywood is less the promotion in movies of left-liberal policies than the breakdown of the old taboos. Those taboos were codified in the Hays Code, which was in force between 1934 and 1968 with the backing of the Catholic Church. The code forbade disrespect of religion and marriage, obscene and scatological language, sexual innuendo, and nudity. The code was abandoned because of changing mores in society rather than because leftwingers suddenly took over Hollywood. If conservatives bought the studios and reinstituted the Hays Code they would soon be out of business. But what is true is that when movie audiences demand vulgar fare, then given that conservatives are more disturbed by vulgarity than liberals are, the film industry becomes less attractive to conservatives as a place to work in. This may be an additional reason for the left-liberal slant of the industry. But as long as the industry is an unregulated competitive industry, market forces will prevent studio heads and owners from trying to impose their own values on audiences, rather than trying to create movies that are in sync with those values.

"Why Is Hollywood Dominated by Liberals?" by Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, The Becker-Posner Blog, August 24, 2008 ---
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/

For every Ronald Reagan Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jon Voight, Charlton Heston, and a few other prominent conservative Hollywood stars, there are probably more than 50 strongly liberal actors, directors, producers, and other "above the line" categories of filmmakers. The top "below the line" categories of cinematographers and production designers are also heavily liberal.Less creative crew members, such as grips, have political views that are closer to those of the general American voting population.

Posner gives several explanations of the liberality of filmmakers, including their engagement in fantasy projects, their irregular employment, and the prominence of Jews, who are mainly liberal, in the industry. There is an additional consideration of great importance. Whereas most actors and other filmmakers have little interest in tax policy, approaches to Medicare and social security, other domestic economic and political questions, and even in many foreign policy issues (except wars), they are very much concerned about policies regarding personal morals. I believe the single most important reason why so many of these Hollywood creative personnel are opposed to the Republican party, especially to the more conservative members of this party, is that the personal morals of many filmmakers deviate greatly from general norms of the American population.

Creative contributors to films divorce in large numbers, often several times. Many have frequent affairs, often while married, they have children without marriage, they have significant numbers of abortions, have a higher than average presence of gays, especially in certain of the creative categories, who are open about their sexual preferences, they take cocaine and other drugs, and generally they lead a life style that differs greatly from what is more representative of the American public. By contrast, an important base of the Republican Party is against out of wedlock births, strongly pro life and against abortions, against gays, especially those who adopt an publicly gay lifestyle, against affairs while married, and very much oppose the legalization of drugs like cocaine and even marijuana.

It becomes impossible for Hollywood types who adopt these different lifestyles to support a political party that is so openly and prominently critical of important aspects of their way of living. That the majority of the relatively few conservative filmmakers lead more ordinary lifestyles confirms this hypothesis: they tend to be heterosexual, married, have children while married, are less into drugs, and in other ways too have more conventional lifestyles. True, some of the most prominent conservative member of Hollywood, such as Reagan and Voight, have been divorced, but divorce is now more accepted even by most conservative Republicans. After all, Ronald Reagan was a darling of conservative Republicans, and John McCain also has been divorced. Note that below the line members of crews lead more conventional life styles, and so they are less likely to be anti conservatives and against Republicans.

When other issues affect filmmakers more than attacks on their morals, their views often become very different. So while many of the more creative filmmakers consider themselves to be socialists, filmmakers, writers, and other creative types in communist countries were typically very strongly opposed to their governments. The obvious reason is that these governments imposed substantial censorship on the type of films that could be made, and so directly interfered with what filmmakers and writers wanted to do.

Another important factor stressed to me by Guity Nashat Becker is that members of the print and visual media who generally have strongly liberal political views surround actors and other creative contributors to films. Since it is well established that political views are greatly affected by the attitudes of people one interacts with closely, it is not surprising that some of the liberality of the media rub off on actors and others in the filmmaking industry. In addition to their concern about political approaches to personal morality, their association with the media helps make filmmakers anti-business, especially big business, and strongly pro-union.

Do the liberal views of Hollywood stars and leaders have a big affect on the opinions of others? I do not know of any evidence on this, but I suspect they only have a small indirect effect. This is not the result of speeches or other statements of their views-since they usually are not articulate in their extemporaneous comments- but their entertainment at various political functions can help generate enthusiastic audiences. More important probably is that whereas audiences do not go to films unless they enjoy them, anti-business and other liberal views will often be an underlying message of popular films. I doubt of these messages have a large permanent effect on the opinions of the audiences, but some affect is surely possible. So all in all, I believe Hollywood is a very minor contributor to general political views, but I do not think their influence can be fully dismissed.

Bob Jensen's threads on the liberal skew in higher education are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/HigherEdControversies.htm#LiberalBias

 




Reconsidering Blackboard
The dominant — and domineering — provider of course-management software has become the company that many campus-technology officials love to hate, especially when it raises prices. Now more colleges are looking at free, open-source alternatives. But Blackboard promises that its new Next Generation software will keep the company ahead of competitors.

"Blackboard Customers Consider Alternatives: Open-source software for course management poses market challenge," by Jeffrey R. Young, Chronicle of Higher Education, September 12, 2008 --- http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i03/03a00103.htm?utm_source=wb&utm_medium=en

Matthew Henry, programming-services manager at LeTourneau University, sat near the front of a ballroom with his arms crossed, ready to watch a multimedia preview of Blackboard Inc.'s next course-management system.

He arrived here in July for the company's annual user conference with more than a few complaints about the company. Its service is poor, he said, its behavior toward competitors is overly aggressive, and its fast growth in recent years has distracted it from supporting the product that helped make it a giant in the usually quiet world of college software.

Blackboard has become the Microsoft of higher-education technology, say many campus-technology officials, and they don't mean the comparison as a compliment. To them the company is not only big but also pushy, and many of them love to hate it.

Mr. Henry's mission here, as he waited with four colleagues from LeTourneau, was to determine whether the company's software remains the best choice to run the Texas university's course Web pages, online discussion boards, digital gradebooks, and other teaching tools, which have become as standard as physical whiteboards on college campuses.

New software called Blackboard NG, for Next Generation, is supposed to keep the company a step ahead and keep people such as Mr. Henry as customers. The user conference was its first public display. "I'm anxious to see whether Blackboard NG is just hype or something that's going to solve our problems" with the company, said Mr. Henry, as the lights dimmed for the presentation.

LeTourneau's contract with Blackboard ends this year, and campus officials may join the growing number of colleges switching to Moodle, a free, open-source course-management system, or Sakai, another free program. Those systems have grown feature-rich enough to pose serious challenges to Blackboard. Giants like the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of California at Los Angeles, along with smaller colleges, like Louisiana State University at Shreveport, have made the jump.

"There are a lot of institutions right now that are upset with Blackboard, to say the least, and looking for alternatives," says Michael Zastrocky, vice president for research at Gartner Inc., a consulting firm that tracks trends in higher-education technology. "They caused a backlash that's been very difficult for them to overcome."

Blackboard is heading for a showdown with the free-software movement, according to some observers. Although Blackboard remains the clear market leader — about 66 percent of American colleges use its software as their standard, says the Campus Computing Project, an annual survey — there are signs that open-source alternatives are starting to gain ground. The survey found that the proportion of colleges using Moodle as their standard rose from 4.2 percent in 2006 to 7.8 percent in 2007, and that about 3 percent of colleges have selected Sakai. A recent survey by the Instructional Technology Council, which promotes distance learning, found that the proportion of its member colleges using Moodle jumped from 4 percent last year to more than 10 percent this year. The proportion using Blackboard fell slightly.

Blackboard's leaders say they see no sign of an exodus to commercial or open-source rivals. "There's not more people leaving now than there were yesterday," said Blackboard's chief executive, Michael L. Chasen, in an interview this summer in the company's new corporate offices, in Washington, where the brightly lit white corridors and modern accents in staff lounges make it look a bit like a Star Trek starship.

Growing Goliath

How big is Blackboard? Three years ago it acquired its major rival, WebCT, solidifying its dominance of the course-management market. The company has also bought other companies in recent years, including the NTI Group, which makes emergency-notification software, and Xythos Software, which makes content-management programs.

How pushy is it? Blackboard claimed a patent on processes that many college officials say were already in widespread use. After the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted the patent, in 2006, Blackboard sued a leading rival, Desire2Learn, claiming infringement. Many saw the move as trying to bully a competitor. (A federal judge found in favor of Blackboard, although the decision has been appealed).

Such tactics are common in other business sectors, says Trace A. Urdan, an education-industry analyst with Signal Hill, an investment firm, but not in the world of college software. "They're sharks operating in this universe where you don't see a lot of sharks," he says of Blackboard's leaders. For him that is a compliment. "They're smart," he says.

Mr. Urdan argues that the legal battle has probably caused enough uncertainty about Desire2Learn's future to scare off larger software companies who might otherwise have considered buying it and turning it into a more serious competitor.

Colleges say they have reason for concern about Blackboard's growing dominance. Their biggest fear is that the company will jack up prices once colleges have become reliant on its products. As one of Sakai's founders, Bradley Wheeler, chief information officer at Indiana University, puts it, "When switching costs get high, you can raise the rent."

Blackboard officials have attempted to calm such concerns and to convince colleges that it is a good partner. Two years ago, after the higher-education technology group Educause took the unusual step of issuing a statement criticizing the company's behavior over the patent, Blackboard's leaders held a town-hall session at Educause's annual conference to answer questions and listen as college officials vented.

But some of those college leaders say the company's ways haven't significantly changed since then.

"That's the first thing that comes to people's mind when you come to Blackboard — its lawsuit," says Stephen G. Landry, chief information officer at Seton Hall University, which uses Blackboard. "I don't like working with a company that seems to spend as much money on legal and financial folks as they do on developers."

So now that open-source options are ready for prime time, many colleges are taking a cold, hard look at the price, reliability, and features of Moodle and Sakai.

Hidden Costs

Price seems like an obvious advantage of open-source software. After all, it is free. But officials say open-source programs can end up costing just as much as, or even more than, Blackboard's software when staff time is taken into account. It all depends on how much customization a college wants, or how many features it needs.

"The software is free, but you have to buy the computers to put it on, and you have to buy a development team to move it forward," says Donna Crystal Llewellyn, director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning at Georgia Tech, which recently switched from WebCT to Sakai. Saving money was not the goal, she says, adding that the university already had a staff of programmers to tackle the challenge.

"Our faculty are very techno-savvy," she says. "They always think they can do something better than someone else that's already put it in a box."

But many smaller colleges say price was indeed a major reason to move away from Blackboard.

"They continued to raise the prices," says Scott Hardwick, assistant director of information-technology services on Louisiana State's Shreveport campus, which a few years ago gave up Blackboard for Moodle.

"Had we continued paying what Blackboard wanted us to pay, it probably would have been $100,000 a year," he says. Now the university pays only about $5,000 a year to an outside company that provides support for the Moodle software. "It's definitely cheaper," says Mr. Hardwick, even considering the time he spends on maintenance.

Professors, too, at Shreveport have been pleased with Moodle. The only complaint Mr. Hardwick says he has heard is that Moodle's user interface doesn't look as slick as Blackboard's. "I'm like, 'Seriously, that's your complaint? It doesn't look as slick?' Apparently that's a huge deal for people."

Blackboard's chief executive, Mr. Chasen, defended his company's prices. "I don't think that we're too expensive," he said in the interview. "Compared to other enterprise software, we're a fraction of the cost." There's a good chance, he said, that colleges "bought their human-resources package for a million dollars."

A Supportive Environment

The downside of open-source software is that because it is free, there's no one company to call if things go wrong. But the downside of buying a commercial program is that if its maker provides poor support, it's hard to get under the hood yourself to make a fix.

Blackboard has a history of poor support, according to many college officials.

"Support in the past has certainly been a challenge for us," Mr. Chasen acknowledged. He blamed the company's rapid growth. "We went from 100 clients to now over 5,000 clients in a relatively short time, and support is one of those areas that lagged behind."

The company recently hired an outside firm as part of an effort to improve its customer service. "We're on the way to answering it," said Mr. Chasen. "We know that support is improving. Is it there yet? No, we still have a long way to go. But over the next few months, you'll start to see significant improvements across the board."

Some colleges running open-source programs initially had concerns about whether free software could be scaled to provide Web sites and services for thousands of courses on large campuses. But UCLA recently decided to use Moodle across the campus, and things are going smoothly as it adds about 900 course Web sites on the system per quarter, says Rosemary Rocchio, director of academic applications in the office of information technoogy there.

But the university has plenty of programmers to handle issues that crop up, she notes. "If you're a small university, and you don't have IT staff, then open source isn't a great solution," she says. "I don't think it's one size fits all."

Innovation as Attraction

The biggest benefit of open-source software, say many observers, is that if a college wants a new feature, it can simply build it, since the entire program code is open. When a college adds a new feature, it shares the code with everyone else using the software.

Blackboard's Mr. Chasen argued that there are benefits to the corporate model of software publishing, too. "I have 300 people on my development team working full time on our products and services," he said. "I don't know if there are 300 full-time people currently working on Sakai. Maybe there are. I have a multimillion-dollar hardware-testing lab just to test scalability."

"At a minimum," he said, "we are at least just as innovative as open source."

Michael Korcuska, executive director of the Sakai Foundation, a nonprofit group that coordinates the use of the open-source software, argues that the open-source model is quicker to react to needs of colleges than Blackboard is. "The people doing the work and deciding what features go in the system are sitting on campus next to the users, not in some back office somewhere," he says.

But Mr. Urdan, the industry analyst, says fine-tuning software is a "luxury" that most colleges can't afford. The slight improvements are often not worth the man-hours and dollar costs of adopting them, he says.

The Next Generation

Many of those arguments, users say, will be settled by the performance of Blackboard's new product.

Continued in article

Bob Jensen's threads on Blackboard and other alternatives --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Blackboard.htm

Bob Jensen's threads on the history of course authoring and management technologies are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/290wp/290wp.htm


 

That some bankers have ended up in prison is not a matter of scandal, but what is outrageous is the fact that all the others are free.
Honoré de Balzac

Bankers bet with their bank's capital, not their own. If the bet goes right, they get a huge bonus; if it misfires, that's the shareholders' problem.
Sebastian Mallaby. Council on Foreign Relations, as quoted by Avital Louria Hahn, "Missing:  How Poor Risk-Management Techniques Contributed to the Subprime Mess," CFO Magazine, March 2008, Page 53 --- http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/10755469/c_10788146?f=magazine_featured
Now that the Fed is going to bail out these crooks with taxpayer funds makes it all the worse.

The bourgeoisie can be termed as any group of people who are discontented with what they have, but satisfied with what they are
Nicolás Dávila

 

The Treasury Department on Sunday seized control of the quasi-public mortgage finance giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and announced a four-part rescue plan that included an open-ended guarantee to provide as much capital as they need to stave off insolvency.

"U.S. Unveils Takeover of Two Mortgage Giants," by Edmund L. Andrews, The New York Times, Septembr 7, 2008 --- http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/business/08fannie.html?hp

At a news conference on Sunday morning, the Treasury secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. also announced that he had dismissed the chief executives of both companies and replaced them with two long-time financial executives. Herbert M. Allison, the former chairman of TIAA-CREF, the huge pension fund for teachers, will take over Fannie Mae and succeed Daniel H. Mudd. At Freddie Mac, David M. Moffett, currently a senior adviser at the Carlyle Group, the large private equity firm, will succeed Richard F. Syron. Mr. Mudd and Mr. Syron, however, will stay on temporarily to help with the transition.

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are so large and so interwoven in our financial system that a failure of either of them would cause great turmoil in our financial markets here at home and around the globe,” Mr. Paulson said. “This turmoil would directly and negatively impact household wealth: from family budgets, to home values, to savings for college and retirement. A failure would affect the ability of Americans to get home loans, auto loans and other consumer credit and business finance. And a failure would be harmful to economic growth and job creation.”

Mr. Paulson refused to say how much capital the government might eventually have to provide, or what the ultimate cost to taxpayers might be.

The companies are likely to need tens of billions of dollars over the next year, but the ultimate cost to taxpayers will largely depend on how fast the housing and mortgage markets recover.

Fannie and Freddie have each agreed to issue $1 billion of senior preferred stock to the United States; it will pay an annual interest rate of at least 10 percent. In return, the government is committing up to $100 billion to each company to cover future losses. The government also receives warrants that would allow it to buy up to 80 percent of each company’s common stock at a nominal price, or less than $1 a share.

Beginning in 2010, the companies must also pay the Treasury a quarterly fee — the amount to be determined — for any financial support provided under the agreement.

Standard & Poor’s, the bond rating agency, said Sunday that the government’s AAA/A-1+ sovereign credit rating would not be affected by the takeover.

Mr. Paulson’s plan begins with a pledge to provide additional cash by buying a new series of preferred shares that would offer dividends and be senior to both the existing preferred shares and the common stock that investors already hold.

The two companies would be allowed to “modestly increase” the size of their existing investment portfolios until the end of 2009, which means they will be allowed to use some of their new taxpayer-supplied capital to buy and hold new mortgages in investment portfolios.

But in a strong indication of Mr. Paulson’s long-term desire to wind down the companies’ portfolios, drastically shrink the role of both Fannie and Freddie and perhaps eliminate their unique status altogether, the plan calls for the companies to start reducing their investment portfolios by 10 percent a year, beginning in 2010.

The investment portfolios now total just over $1.4 trillion, and the plan calls for that to eventually shrink to $250 billion each, or $500 billion total.

“Government support needs to be either explicit or nonexistent, and structured to resolve the conflict between public and private purposes,” Mr. Paulson said. “We will make a grave error if we don’t use this time out to permanently address the structural issues presented by the G.S.