Bob Jensen is
in the Department of Business
Administration at TrinityUniversity.
Email: rjensen@trinity.edu
![]()
Bob Jensen's Codec Saga: How I Lost a Big Part of My Life's
Work
Until My Friend Rick Lillie Solved My Problem
http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/video/VideoCodecProblems.htm
Shielding Against
Validity Challenges in Plato's Cave ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TheoryTAR.htm
Shielding Against Validity Challenges in Plato's Cave
---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TheoryTAR.htm
By Bob Jensen
Table of Contents
Free Online Textbooks, Videos, and Tutorials ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Textbooks
Free Tutorials in Various Disciplines ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials
Edutainment and Learning Games ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/thetools.htm#Edutainment
Open Sharing Courses ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/updateee.htm#OKI
Gaming for Tenure as an Accounting Professor
---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TheoryTenure.htm
(with a reply about tenure publication point systems from Linda Kidwell)
"So you want to get a Ph.D.?" by David Wood, BYU ---
http://www.byuaccounting.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=So_you_want_to_get_a_Ph.D.%3F
Do You Want to Teach? ---
http://financialexecutives.blogspot.com/2009/05/do-you-want-to-teach.html
Jensen Comment
Here are some added positives and negatives to consider, especially if you are
currently a practicing accountant considering becoming a professor.
Accountancy Doctoral Program Information from Jim Hasselback ---
http://www.jrhasselback.com/AtgDoctInfo.htmlWhy must all accounting doctoral programs be social science (particularly econometrics) "accountics" doctoral programs?
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theory01.htm#DoctoralProgramsWhat went wrong in accounting/accountics research?
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theory01.htm#WhatWentWrong
AN ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF RESEARCH
CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW: 1926-2005 ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/395wpTAR/Web/TAR395wp.htm#_msocom_1
Systemic problems of accountancy (especially the
vegetable nutrition paradox) that probably will never be solved ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudConclusion.htm#BadNews
"The
Accounting Doctoral Shortage: Time for a New Model,"
by Neal Mero, Jan R. Williams and George W. Krull, Jr. .
Issues in Accounting Education 24 (4)
http://aaapubs.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=IAEXXX000024000004000427000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes&ref=no
ABSTRACT:
The crisis in supply versus demand for doctorally qualified faculty members in accounting is well documented (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business [AACSB] 2003a, 2003b; Plumlee et al. 2005; Leslie 2008). Little progress has been made in addressing this serious challenge facing the accounting academic community and the accounting profession. Faculty time, institutional incentives, the doctoral model itself, and research diversity are noted as major challenges to making progress on this issue. The authors propose six recommendations, including a new, extramurally funded research program aimed at supporting doctoral students that functions similar to research programs supported by such organizations as the National Science Foundation and other science-based funding sources. The goal is to create capacity, improve structures for doctoral programs, and provide incentives to enhance doctoral enrollments. This should lead to an increased supply of graduates while also enhancing and supporting broad-based research outcomes across the accounting landscape, including auditing and tax. ©2009 American Accounting Association
Bob
Jensen's threads on accountancy doctoral programs are at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theory01.htm#DoctoralPrograms
Capsule Commentary Book Review, The Accounting Review, January 2012,
pp. 356-357 ---
http://aaajournals.org/doi/full/10.2308/accr-10189
CAPSULE COMMENTARY
Stephen A. Zeff, Editor
HARRY I. WOLK (editor), Accounting Theory (London, U.K.: Sage Publications Ltd., 2009, ISBN 978-1-84787-609-6, pp. xlv, 1,518 in four volumes).
Harry I. Wolk, the compiler of this collection of 74 previously published articles and other essays, died in October 2009 at age 79. In 1984, he was assisted by two colleagues in writing a thoughtful, wide-ranging textbook on accounting theory, which is now in its seventh edition. He has, thus, been a close student of the accounting theory literature for many years.
Wolk's valedictory contribution is this anthology, which is divided into ten sections: philosophical background, accounting concepts, conceptual frameworks, accounting for changing prices, standard setting, applications of accounting theory to five measurement areas, agency theory, principles versus rules, international accounting standards, and accounting issues in East and Southeast Asia. Because he provides only a two-and-a-half-page general introduction, we cannot know the criteria he used to make these selections. The earliest of the articles dates from 1958, and one infers that this collection represents the body of work that, over his long career, mostly at Drake University, he found to be influential writings.
Among the major contributors to the theory literature represented in the collection are Devine, Mattessich, Davidson, Solomons, Sterling, Thomas, Bell, Shillinglaw, Bedford, Ijiri, and Stamp. Conspicuous omissions are Chambers, Baxter, Staubus, Moonitz, Sorter, and Vatter. Although many of the earlier pieces have stood the test of time, a number of the more recent selections would, inevitably, be open to second-guessing. To be sure, most of these articles can be accessed electronically, yet it is instructive to know the works that Harry Wolk believed were worth remembering, and it is handy to have them all in one collection.
The price tag of £600/$1,050 for the four-volume set will, unfortunately, deter all but the most enthusiastic purchasers.
Jensen Comment
And to think my constantly-updated accounting theory book (in two volumes) has a
price tag of $0 (Sigh!)---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Theory01.htm
But I do thank Harry for providing me with an accounting illustration that
I turned into the most popular Excel illustration that I ever authored (i.e.,
popular in the eyes of my students over the years) ---
www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/Excel/wtdcase2a.xls
Comparisons
of IFRS with Domestic Standards of Many Nations
http://www.iasplus.com/country/compare.htm
More Detailed Differences (Comparisons) between FASB and IASB Accounting Standards
2011 Update
"IFRS and US GAAP: Similarities and Differences" according to PwC (2011 Edition)
http://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ifrs-reporting/publications/ifrs-and-us-gaap-similarities-and-differences.jhtml
Note the Download button!
Note that warnings are given throughout the document that the similarities and differences mentioned in the booklet are not comprehensive of all similarities and differences. The document is, however, a valuable addition to students of FASB versus IASB standard differences and similarities.It's not easy keeping track of what's changing and how, but this publication can help. Changes for 2011 include:
- Revised introduction reflecting the current status, likely next steps, and what companies should be doing now
(see page 2);- Updated convergence timeline, including current proposed timing of exposure drafts, deliberations, comment periods, and final standards
(see page 7);- More current analysis of the differences between IFRS and US GAAP -- including an assessment of the impact embodied within the differences
(starting on page 17); and- Details incorporating authoritative standards and interpretive guidance issued through July 31, 2011
(throughout).This continues to be one of PwC's most-read publications, and we are confident the 2011 edition will further your understanding of these issues and potential next steps.
For further exploration of the similarities and differences between IFRS and US GAAP, please also visit our IFRS Video Learning Center.
To request a hard copy of this publication, please contact your PwC engagement team or contact us.
Jensen Comment
My favorite comparison topics (Derivatives and Hedging) begin on Page 158
The booklet does a good job listing differences but, in my opinion, overly downplays the importance of these differences. It may well be that IFRS is more restrictive in some areas and less restrictive in other areas to a fault. This is one topical area where IFRS becomes much too subjective such that comparisons of derivatives and hedging activities under IFRS can defeat the main purpose of "standards." The main purpose of an "accounting standard" is to lead to greater comparability of inter-company financial statements. Boo on IFRS in this topical area, especially when it comes to testing hedge effectiveness!One key quotation is on Page 165
IFRS does not specifically discuss the methodology of applying a critical-terms match in the level of detail included within U.S. GAAP.
Then it goes yatta, yatta, yatta.Jensen Comment
This is so typical of when IFRS fails to present the "same level of detail" and more importantly fails to provide "implementation guidance" comparable with the FASB's DIG implementation topics and illustrations.I have a huge beef with the lack of illustrations in IFRS versus the many illustrations in U.S. GAAP.
I have a huge beef with the lack of illustrations in IFRS versus the many illustrations in U.S. GAAP.
I have a huge beef with the lack of illustrations in IFRS versus the many illustrations in U.S. GAAP.
Bob Jensen's threads on accounting standards setting controversies ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Theory01.htm#MethodsForSettingComparisons of IFRS with Domestic Standards of Many Nations
http://www.iasplus.com/country/compare.htm
Chris Deeley in Australia and I have been corresponding regarding an antique
learning curve paper that I published nearly 20 years ago. You can read some of
our correspondence at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theorylearningcurves.htm
In that correspondence I discuss the good and evil of the Wolfram Alpha
computational search engine.
Chris also sent me his latest working paper on an entirely different topic (which I've not yet found time to delve into). I asked if I could serve up the paper to my AECM friends and others. When I find time I would like to test some of his formulas in Wolfram Alpha. Chris is skeptical.
September 23, 2010 message from
Bob
Yes, by all means post my working paper on general annuities on the AECM website. I suspect that Wolfram Alpha may not be able to handle this sort of thing. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if the application of standard maths has created and entrenched the error. ChrisChris Deeley
Senior Lecturer in Accounting & Finance
School of Accounting,
Faculty of Business
Charles Sturt University,
Locked Mail Bag 588
Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678
Ph: +612 69332694 Fax: +612 69332790
Email: cdeeley@csu.edu.au
Web:www.csu.edu.a u
I put his paper on one of my Web servers. I'm sure that Chris will appreciate any comments that you have regarding this technical topic. It may be a good exercise for accounting and finance students to study this paper.
"IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTION OF A COMMON ERROR IN GENERAL ANNUITY
CALCULATIONS," by Chris Deeley, Charles Sturt University, Australia., September
23, 2010 Working Draft ---
http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/temp/DeeleyAnnuityCorrections.pdf
The Insignificance of Testing the Null
October 1, 2010 message from Amy Dunbar
Nick Cox posted a link to a statistics paper on statalist:
2009. Statistics: reasoning on uncertainty, and the insignificance of testing null. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46: 138-157.
http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anz46-free/anz46-138.pdf
Cox commented that the paper touches provocatively on several topics often aired on statalist including the uselessness of dynamite or detonator plots, displays for comparing group means and especially the over-use of null hypothesis testing. The main target audience is ecologists but most of the issues cut across statistical science.
Dunbar comment: The paper would be a great addition to any PhD research seminar. The author also has some suggestions for journal editors. I included some responses to Nick's original post below.
Jensen Comment
And to think Alpha (Type 1) error is the easy part. Does anybody ever test for
the more important Beta (Type 2) error? I think some engineers test for Type 2
error with Operating Characteristic (OC) curves, but these are generally applied
where controlled experiments are super controlled such as in quality control
testing.
Beta Error --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_error#Type_II_error
Bob Jensen's threads on accounting theory
---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theory01.htm
Tom Lehrer on Mathematical Models and
Statistics ---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfZWyUXn3So
Systemic problems of accountancy (especially the
vegetable nutrition paradox) that probably will never be solved ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/FraudConclusion.htm#BadNews
Accounting and Taxation News Sites ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/AccountingNews.htm
| AECM
(Educators)
http://listserv.aaahq.org/cgi- AECM is an email Listserv list which provides a forum for discussions of all hardware and software which can be useful in any way for accounting education at the college/university level. Hardware includes all platforms and peripherals. Software includes spreadsheets, practice sets, multimedia authoring and presentation packages, data base programs, tax packages, World Wide Web applications, etc. Over the years the AECM has become the worldwide forum for accounting educators on all issues of accountancy and accounting education, including debates on accounting standards, managerial accounting, careers, fraud, forensic accounting, auditing, doctoral programs, and critical debates on academic (accountics) research, publication, replication, and validity testing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Yahoo (Practitioners)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xyztalk This forum is for CPAs to discuss the activities of the AICPA. This can be anything from the CPA2BIZ portal to the XYZ initiative or anything else that relates to the AICPA. |
||
|
AccountantsWorld
http://accountantsworld.com/forums/default.asp?scope=1 This site hosts various discussion groups on such topics as accounting software, consulting, financial planning, fixed assets, payroll, human resources, profit on the Internet, and taxation. |
||
|
Business Valuation Group
BusValGroup-subscribe@topica.com This discussion group is headed by Randy Schostag [RSchostag@BUSVALGROUP.COM] |
||
|
FEI's Financial Reporting Blog
Smart Stops on the Web, Journal of Accountancy, March 2008 --- http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/mar2008/smart_stops.htm
|
||
|
The CAlCPA Tax Listserv September 4, 2008 message from Scott Bonacker
[lister@bonackers.com]
Scott forwarded the following message from Jim Counts
|
Daily News Sites for Accountancy, Tax, Fraud, IFRS, XBRL, Accounting
History, and More ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/AccountingNews.htm
Free Online Textbooks, Videos, and Tutorials ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ElectronicLiterature.htm#Textbooks
Free Tutorials in Various Disciplines ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob2.htm#Tutorials
Edutainment and Learning Games ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/thetools.htm#Edutainment
Open Sharing Courses ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/000aaa/updateee.htm#OKI
The Master List of Free
Online College Courses ---
http://universitiesandcolleges.org/
Bob Jensen's threads for online worldwide education and training
alternatives ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Crossborder.htm
"U. of Manitoba Researchers Publish Open-Source Handbook on Educational Technology," by Steve Kolowich, Chronicle of Higher Education, March 19, 2009 --- http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=3671&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Concerns That Academic Accounting Research is Out of Touch With Realit
|
I think leading academic
researchers avoid applied research for the profession because making
seminal and creative discoveries that practitioners have not already
discovered is enormously difficult.
Accounting academe is
threatened by the twin dangers of fossilization and scholasticism
(of three types: tedium, high tech, and radical chic) From http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/395wpTAR/Web/TAR395wp.htm
What went wrong in
accounting/accountics research?
|
Chris Deeley in Australia and I have been corresponding regarding an antique
learning curve paper that I published nearly 20 years ago. You can read some of
our correspondence at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theorylearningcurves.htm
In that correspondence I discuss the good and evil of the Wolfram Alpha
computational search engine.
Instructors might want to consider adding this to their teaching modules on time value of money and annuity mathematics of finance.
Working Paper 440
Annuities With Unequal Compounding and Payment Periods: The CFA
Deconstruction Analysis
Bob Jensen at
Trinity University
Financial calculators and Excel financial formulas for computing present value, interim payments, and rates of return assume that p=m where p is the number of equally-spaced payments per year and m is the number equally-spaced interest compoundings per year. Complications introduced by p not being equal to m are not trivial problems. These complications are overlooked in many (probably almost all) mathematics of finance modules in both high school and college courses.
This note will demonstrate how to deal with complications when the number of payments per year is unequal to the number in times interest is compounded per year. This is not a purely academic problem. Companies buying and selling annuities often do not want to change the number of times interest is compounded every time they change the number of payments per year in a contract such as semi-annual payments versus quarterly payments versus monthly payments.
The paper was inspired by the following working paper sent to me by an Australian professor named Chris Deeley. Chris subsequently allowed me to put his paper on one of my Web servers:
"IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTION OF A COMMON ERROR
IN GENERAL ANNUITY CALCULATIONS"
by Chris Deeley
cdeeley@csu.edu.au
Working Paper, Charles Sturt University, Australia, September 22, 2010
http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/temp/DeeleyAnnuityCorrections.pdf
For illustrative purposes I will focus on the following example on Page 11 of Professor Deeley's working paper:
Example 2
A loan of $1million is to be repaid in equal monthly installments over four
years. If the annual interest rate is 10% compounded semi-annually, how much is
the monthly repayment?
The two solutions given by Professor Deeley for p=12 payments per year and m=2 interest compoundings per year are as follows:
Deeley Solution 1 PMT = $25,265.60 per month which Professor Deeley claims the "conventional solution"
Deeley Solution 2 PMT = $25,260.70 per month which Professor Deeley claims is his "proposed better solution"
I contend that there is a CFA Deconstruction and Rate Equivalence solution that I offer as an "alternate conventional solution" used of Certified Financial Analyst (CFA) examinations.
CFA Deconstruction PMT = $25,483 per month which conforms to David Frick's solution tutorial
I show how to calculate this $25,483 using both Wolfram
Alpha and Excel in my Working Paper 440 ---
Bob Jensen's analysis of Annuities With Unequal Compounding and Payment
Periods: The CFA Deconstruction Analysis
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/TheoryAnnuity01.htm
Updated Accounting Theory --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen//theory/00overview/theory01.htm
The Sad State of Accounting Research --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen//theory/00overview/theory01.htm#AcademicsVersusProfession
Questions ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen//theory/00overview/theory01.htm#DoctoralPrograms
Why must all accounting doctoral programs be social science (particularly
econometrics) doctoral programs?
What's wrong with humanities research methodologies?
What's wrong about studying accounting in accounting doctoral programs?
Why are we graduating so many new assistant professors of accounting who do
not know any accounting?
Bob Jensen's
letter to Kate http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/2007NotableLiteratureAward.htmAn Analysis of the
Contributions of The Accounting Review Across 80 Years: 1926-2005 ---
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/395wpTAR/Web/TAR395wp.htm
Co-authored with Jean Heck and forthcoming in the December 2007 edition of the
Accounting Historians Journal.
I sent out an "Appeal" for accounting educators, researchers, and practitioners to actively support what I call The Accounting Review (TAR) Diversity Initiative as initiated by last year's American Accounting Association President Judy Rayburn --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/395wpTAR/Web/TAR.htm
Bob Jensen's helpers on accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/000index.htm
Comparisons of International IAS Versus FASB Standards --- http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/pocketiasus.pdf
Dear Professor Bob Jensen,
The Journal of Deivatives Accounting (JDA) is preparing to publish its first issue and I would be grateful if you could post the following announcement on your web site.
Regards
Mamouda
Dear Colleagues,
There is a new addition to accounting research Journals. The Journal of Derivatives Accounting (JDA) is an international quarterly publication which provides authoritative accounting and finance literature on issues of financial innovations such as derivatives and their implications to accounting, finance, tax, standards setting, and corporate practices. This refereed journal disseminates research results and serves as a means of communication among academics, standard setters, practitioners, and market participants.
The first and special issue of the JDA, to appear in the Winter of 2003, will be dedicated to:
"Stock Options: Developments in Share-Based Compensation (Accounting, Standards, Tax and Corporate Practice)"
This special issue will consider papers dealing with:
* Analysis of applicable national and international accounting standards * Convergence between IASB and FASB * Accounting treatment (Expensing) * Valuation * Corporate and market practice * Design of stock options * Analysis of the structure of stock options contracts * Executives pay incentives and performance * Taxation * Management and Corporate Governance
For more details on how to submit your work to the journal, please visit http://www.worldscinet.com/jda.html
Sincerely,
The Editorial Board Journal of Derivatives Accounting (JDA)
We hope that the FASB will include our proposed calculation corrections in the table on Page 75 of FAS 133 and add our proposed explanation of the yield curve derivations to the FASB's Amendments to FAS 133.
The Hubbard and Jensen paper can be downloaded as follows:
Working Paper 305: Some Corrections and Explanations of Example 5 in FAS 133
The HTML version is at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/133ex05.htmThe revised spreadsheet is at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/133ex05a.xls
I also have a tutorial Excel file called 133exb.xls that can be downloaded along with my updated tutorials. Because this file is not made available to my students, you must send me an email request for the secret web link to this file. My email address is rjensen@trinity.edu
I also have a tutorial Excel file called 133exb.xls that can be downloaded along with my updated tutorials. Because this file is not made available to my students, you must send me an email request for the secret web link to this file. My email address is rjensen@trinity.edu
I have some SFAS 133 documents on "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Unfortunately my tutorials cannot be made available to the general public since they contain answers that I do not want my students to see. However, you may view the following documents:
I do not forward advertising requests form commercial vendors unless I feel that my "audience" would appreciate hearing about particular new products and services. This one is very important to some accounting researchers.
April 30, 2008 message from Tom Hardy [thardy@ivesinc.com]
Dear Professor Jensen,
I am writing to let you know about two new research modules available with the AuditAnalytics.com SEC research database. Specifically, our Litigation Module now tracks all material federal litigation involving Russell 3000 companies and all federal litigation involving the top 100 audit firms. This module contains over 12,500 cases in the database. It includes all securities class actions and SEC litigation filed since the year 2000.
In the next few months we also will be making available as an add-on our Advanced Restatement Data to include:
Net Income Effect*
Net Effect on Stockholders Equity*
First Announcement Date*
First Magnitude Announcement Date* All related filings to each restatement*
*Data analysis for these fields restricted to NYSE, Nasdaq and AMEX public companies and is currently populated from 2003 to present.
FIN 48 Revisions (All SEC registrants for fiscal years beginning after Dec 15th, 2006) SAB 108 Revisions (All SEC registrants for fiscal year ends after Nov 15th, 2006)
As the leader in Audit Industry Research, AuditAnalytics.com provides detailed information on over 20,000 publicly registered companies and over 1,500 accounting firms. Our database enables you, your students and faculty to quickly search and analyze reported:
- SOX 404 Internal Controls and SOX 302 Disclosure Controls
- Restatements
- Directory and Officer Changes
- Late filers (Form NT)
- Auditor fees, changes, and opinions
- Governance information (Non-historical)
I sincerely believe that you would find our online service to be a valuable resource for your academic research. We are currently offering special academic and educational subscription pricing for the service and I would be happy to discuss this further at your convenience. Please let me know if there is a good time for us to speak and if you would like any additional information or an online demonstration of the AuditAnalytics.com service.
Best Regards,
Tom
PS. Please feel free to ask me about AuditAnalytics.com availability via the WRDS Database http://wrds.wharton.upenn.edu/
Tom Hardy
IVES Group, Inc.
9 Main Street, Suite 2F
Sutton, MA 01590
Phone: (508) 476-7007 ext. 228
e-mail: thardy@ivesinc.com
www.auditanalytics.com - Independent Research Provider to the Accounting, Insurance, Research and Investment Communities
April 30, 2008 reply from Todd Pullen [btpull@COMCAST.NET]
Does anyone have a recommendation on a good site for financial reports?
I have found that some of the free sites such a Google Finance and Marketwatch are not that accurate or their data is outdated.
April 30, 2008 reply from Edith Orenstein [eorenstein@FINANCIALEXECUTIVES.ORG]
I recently had demo of CCH Accounting Research Manager (ARM) and it seemed to have a pretty good search capability for recent filings.
April 30, 2008 reply from W. O. Mills, III C.P.A., C.A., P.F.S [wom@WOMILLS.COM]
I am not sure of what you might be looking for exactly...but perhaps Edgars would be of some benefit to you.
April 30, 2008 reply from David Albrecht [albrecht@PROFALBRECHT.COM]
I use several. Usually I go directly to a company's web site.
If I'm simply shopping for something to use in class I go to
http://www.annualreportservice.com/
April 30, 2008 reply from Bob Jensen
And don't forget to try the wonderful new TryXBRL service (free for now) and the new Financial Explorer service from the SEC
"TryXBRL.org Launched," SmartPros, March 28, 2008 --- http://accounting.smartpros.com/x61325.xmlA new Web site, TryXBRL.com, allows free access to view and analyze complete XBRL-tagged financial statements for over 12,000 publicly traded corporations.
After registering on the portal, TryXBRL.org, corporate finance professionals can educate themselves about the XBRL tagging process and view their own historical financial information in XBRL format. Investors and analysts can experience how XBRL reduces the complexity and costs associated with analyzing performance data.
The site is a collaboration of EDGAR Online Inc., a business and financial information provider, and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, a print services company.
"Our goal has been to deliver solutions that do not require technical expertise or excessive time commitments by corporations wishing to take part in the SEC Voluntary Program or to familiarize themselves with XBRL," said Philip Moyer, President and CEO of EDGAR Online, Inc. "We are providing open access to our vast XBRL database through a solution that enables corporations to begin filing XBRL content with the SEC in as little as a few hours."
RR Donnelley and EDGAR Online have collaborated to deliver XBRL filing solutions to corporations since 2005.
Once again that site is at http://www.tryxbrl.org/
April 1, 2008 reply from Amy Dunbar [Amy.Dunbar@BUSINESS.UCONN.EDU]
I just tried the site. Wow. Very powerful. I confirmed the numbers for one company to make sure I knew what I was seeing. It pulled the 2007 four quarter numbers for my selected company and then the 4th qtr numbers for the three peer companies and my selected company. I'm not sure where that 12,000 publicly traded corporations is coming from. They must mean filings, not corporations. I found the following table for March/June 2005 in Appendix F. http://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acspc/acspc-finalreport.pdf If you include pink sheet companies, the data for which are not publicly available (at least to my knowledge), the total climbs to 13,094. Does anyone have a source for more recent numbers of publicly traded corporations?
Listing Venue Number of Companies Listed NYSE 2,553 AMEX 747 NASDAQ National Market 2,580 NASDAQ Capital Market1 593 OTC Bulletin Board 2,955 Total 9,428
The table (I only show part of it) has the following footnote explanation: Source: Public data includes 13,094 companies from the Center for Research in Securities Prices at the University of Chicago for NYSE and AMEX companies as of March 31, 2005 and from NASDAQ for NASDAQ and OTC Bulletin Board companies and from Datastream Advance for Pink Sheets companies as of June 10, 2005. This table was compiled by members of the staff of the SEC's Office of Economic Analysis and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the Commission staff.
Amy Dunbar UConn
Bob Jensen's threads on XBRL are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/XBRLandOLAP.htm
"SEC unveils 'Financial Explorer' investor tool using XBRL," AccountingWeb, February 20, 2008 ---
http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=104665Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox has announced the launch of the "Financial Explorer" on the SEC Web site to help investors quickly and easily analyze the financial results of public companies. Financial Explorer paints the picture of corporate financial performance with diagrams and charts, using financial information provided to the SEC as "interactive data" in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).
At the click of a mouse, Financial Explorer lets investors automatically generate financial ratios,
graphs, and charts depicting important information from financial statements. Information including earnings, expenses, cash flows, assets, and liabilities can be analyzed and compared across competing public companies. The software takes the work out of manipulating the data by entirely eliminating tasks such as copying and pasting rows of revenues and expenses into a spreadsheet. That frees investors to focus on their investments' financial results through visual representations that make the numbers easier to understand. Investors can use Financial Explorer by visiting www.sec.gov/xbrl .
"XBRL is fast becoming the universal language for the exchange of business information and it is the future of financial reporting," said Cox. "With Financial Explorer or another XBRL viewer, investors will be able to quickly make sense of financial statements. In the near future, potentially millions of people will be able to analyze and compare financial statements and make better-informed investment decisions. That's a big benefit to ordinary investors."
David Blaszkowsky, Director of the SEC's Office of Interactive Disclosure, encouraged investors to try out the new software. "Financial Explorer will help investors analyze investment choices much quicker. I encourage both companies and investors to visit the SEC Web site, try the software, and get a first-hand glimpse of the future of financial analysis, especially for the retail investor."
Financial Explorer is open source, meaning that its source code is free to the public, and technology and financial experts can update and enhance the software. As interactive data becomes more commonplace, investors, analysts, and others working in the financial industry may develop hundreds of Web-based applications that help investors garner insights about financial results through creative ways of analyzing and presenting the information.
Continued in article
Jensen Comment
The Financial Explorer link --- http://209.234.225.154/viewer/home/
Note the "Take a Tour" option.Bob Jensen's videos (created before the SEC created the Financial Explorer) are at http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/video/Tutorials/
When I can find some time, I'll create a Financial Explorer update video.Bob Jensen's threads on XBRL are at http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/XBRLandOLAP.htm
I have some SFAS 133 documents on "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Unfortunately my tutorials cannot be made available to the general public since they contain answers that I do not want my students to see. However, you may view the following documents:
| Bob Jensen's homepage
--- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/ Bob Jensen's accounting theory documents --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/theory.htm Issues in the accounting, finance, and business scandals --- http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/fraud.htm
|
AccountingWeb invites professors to submit questions for a Weekly
AccountingWeb Quiz ---
http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=104117
AccountingWEB is pleased to announce its weekly accounting quiz, now appearing in the Student Zone area of the AccountingWEB site. Just click Student Zone at the left of any AccountingWEB page (or click the Student Zone link at the bottom of this story) to access the weekly quiz and to be eligible for great prizes!
Accounting professors from across the country are participating in Test Your Knowledge, submitting their favorite quiz questions to see if they can stump the AccountingWEB audience. Each Monday, a new quiz will appear. The winners from the previous week will be announced in each Tuesday's Weekly Business Bite, a free news wire to which you can subscribe.
The top ten winners each week will receive AccountingWEB t-shirts. In the event that more than 10 participants get all the questions correct, a drawing will be held among the winners to select the 10 t-shirt recipients.
Only one entry is allowed per person, per quiz, however you can enter the new quiz each week, even if you are a winner of a previous quiz.
So dust off your accounting rules and enter this week's quiz TODAY!
Note that AccountingWeb now has a "Student Zone" at
http://www.accountingweb.com/news/student_channel.html
There's also a "Lecture Hall" at
http://www.accountingweb.com/lecture_hall/index.html
A useful set of accounting links is provided at
http://www.accountingweb.com/links/index.html
I added these to my bookmarks at
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/Bookbob1.htm
Jensen Comment
Accounting instructors may want to add some of these questions to their test
banks. Or they may want their students to take these weekly quizzes as part of a
course (possibly only for non-credit practice and fun).
Recently I added some of my old theory exam questions and problems (heavy on
FAS 133 and IAS 39) under "Exam Material" at
http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~rjensen/Calgary/CD/
Most of my questions and problems are probably too specialized for an
AccountingWeb Quiz. But they may help advanced students learn more about theory.
Across a span of 30 years of research, I have been fortunate to have a relatively large number of research papers accepted for publication. to view a listing of the ones that "got caught" click on http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/resume.htm#Published
I have also been fortuanate to have been invited to make presentations of my research at a great many conferences and university campuses. For a listing of these presentations, see http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/resume.htm#Presentations
In the course of those 40+ years, there were also some research papers that "got away." For a variety of reasons, journal referees and editors did not find sufficient merit in the drafts of these papers to accept them for publication. Most of my drafts that got away were deservedly rejected. (Probably in a conspiracy to keep me humble.) However, as I reflect upon my past work, I think that at least three of my favorites were rejected even though I liked the papers better than most of my work that was accepted for publication. The powers of the Internet now allow me to make these "big ones" available to the world. The papers below are HTML versions of the original (not revised) drafts. Please keep the dates of the papers in mind in you take the time and trouble to examine my big ones that got away.
| Return to Bob Jensen's Home Page | Return to Top of Document |
Click
here to search this web site if you have key words to enter --- Search Site.
This search engine may get you some hits from other professors at Trinity
University included with Bob Jensen's documents, but this may be to your
benefit.